Why?

There isn't anything in there that is Earth shattering.

it is a bad precedent to be publishing info on secret fisa application cases and processes...you asked me about the specifics and i said it is a bad precedent.

Latest blockbuster revelation from Nunes: TRUMP NEVER MET WITH PAPADOPOLOUS!



Great work by Trump's favorite journalists at Fox and Friends, who broke this story. This is the sort of real news the fake news media will never give you.

Posted by cccp1014 on 2/5/2018 11:12:00 AM (view original):
Can we agree that the memo doesn't endanger national security?

I can agree that to most of us laymen it appears that the Nunes memo ITSELF doesn't damage national security itself.

BUT, as the memo is (supposedly) based on classified intelligence and as BOTH the DOJ and the FBI have given unusally strong statements in opposition to it's release on those very grounds, I say trust the experts!! These important American institutions (DOJ and the FBI) are vital to our security and are led by HAND-PICKED individual's of Trump's own choice, and are BOTH either non-partison or out-right Republicans! (Wray!)

It is quite obvious to ALL but the most ardent Trump stoolies and excusers/apologists that Trump (and his "team") are getting very desperate about this Mueller investigation and are willing to do most anything (including sabotaging and damaging importnat agencies like the FBI) in their attempts to continue covering up whatever it is that Trump/Pence have done during the election process. Additionally Trump (himself) almost assuredly has financial improprieties that he does NOT want uncovered. Hence his long held secrecy concerning his REAL finances!
In short, most of the Country already knows THIS PRESIDENT IS A CROOK, and quite possibly a TRAITOR!
Time for him to go! NOW!

attacks upon the institutions themselves will damage them...there is malicious attempt by tea party disciples to do just that.....trump could care less..all of us know that.......people like nunes are not stooges...he knows exactly what he is doing.
the oj analogy has entered the national analysis.
so has the mccarthyism analogy.
these people are as far from being patriotic as it gets.
even gowdy who let himself be used refused to say that the memo had or should have any bearing on the mueller probe.

The Onion, or CNN? Guess!

President Donald Trump mocked Democrats Monday for their stony reactions during his State of the Union speech last week, saying that it was even "treasonous."

"They were like death and un-American. Un-American. Somebody said, 'Treasonous.' I mean, yeah, I guess, why not," he said to laughter.

"Can we call that treason? Why not," he added. He made the remarks during a speech at a manufacturing plant in Cincinnati, Ohio.

"I mean they certainly didn't seem to love our country that much," he said, adding it was "very, very sad."

Trump's comments came less than a week after he delivered his State of the Union address in which he preached the virtue of bipartisanship.

Posted by crazystengel on 2/5/2018 4:07:00 PM (view original):
The Onion, or CNN? Guess!

President Donald Trump mocked Democrats Monday for their stony reactions during his State of the Union speech last week, saying that it was even "treasonous."

"They were like death and un-American. Un-American. Somebody said, 'Treasonous.' I mean, yeah, I guess, why not," he said to laughter.

"Can we call that treason? Why not," he added. He made the remarks during a speech at a manufacturing plant in Cincinnati, Ohio.

"I mean they certainly didn't seem to love our country that much," he said, adding it was "very, very sad."

Trump's comments came less than a week after he delivered his State of the Union address in which he preached the virtue of bipartisanship.

Doesn't matter.

BOTH ARE FAKE NEWS

THE TOILET BOWL

DONALD TRUMP V HERBERT HOOVER

New name for Hoovervilles = Trump Hotels

maybe papadopolis is the new joe vallachi.

looks like trump will not voluntarily answer under oath and might under subpoena assert 5th amendment....cant be trusted to answer even the easy questions.


dems should taunt him...call him MR. CHICKEN.
hey mr chicken......

The Secure Fence Act of 2006

The Secure Fence Act of 2006, which was passed by a Republican Congress and signed by President George W. Bush, authorized about 700 miles of fencing along certain stretches of land between the border of the United States and Mexico.

The act also authorized the use of more vehicle barriers, checkpoints and lighting to curb illegal immigration, and the use of advanced technology such as satellites and unmanned aerial vehicles.

At the time the act was being considered, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer were all members of the Senate. (Schumer of New York is now the Senate minority leader.)

Obama, Clinton, Schumer and 23 other Democratic senators voted in favor of the act when it passed in the Senate by a vote of 80 to 19.

And in 2013 we saw this from Democrats:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/2013-all-senate-dems-voted-to-build-border-fence-kill-visa-lottery-end-chain-migration/article/2647518

i think that was a fence.

So? Everything else they were repeatedly in favor of. And many see little difference between fencing and a wall. They are meant to do the same thing. And neither where nature doesn't allow a physical fence or wall...

My point is they favored all of the above until Trump. They oppose him, so they oppose what he pushes for. They abandon principles to resist. It will not win in the midterms.