STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS 2009-10 Topic

The craziest part........................   Torres who the Hawks LOATHE takes out a star like Hossa with a head shot and not one Hawk retaliates.  

That **** would never happen on the flyers. 
4/18/2012 12:46 AM (edited)
Posted by randle44 on 4/18/2012 12:25:00 AM (view original):
Somebody get Quennville some more kleenex before he ruins his suit with his crocodile tears..
i laughed
4/18/2012 12:39 AM
 NHL.Com for my Torres #37 jersey
4/18/2012 1:32 AM
Keith and Shaw get suspensions for head shots but nobody in Hawkville acknowledges that ..everybody else in the league is dirty?
4/18/2012 1:35 AM
Posted by moy23 on 4/18/2012 12:46:00 AM (view original):
The craziest part........................   Torres who the Hawks LOATHE takes out a star like Hossa with a head shot and not one Hawk retaliates.  

That **** would never happen on the flyers. 
This is very true.  The Hawks are never going to win the cup again if they don't start protecting their own.  Didn't they leave their Captain to fend for himself earlier this season too?  The reason the Bruins won last year wasn't because they were the new rendition of the "Broad Street Bullies", It's because they always protect their own, no matter what the circumstances are.  As moy has already stated, it's also the reason why the Flyers are kicking the crap out of the Penguins and are probably the Cup favourites (at least in my eyes) at this point in the playoffs.  This "style" did not start with the Bruins in last year's playoffs.  It has been evolving into what it is for many years throughout hockey at all levels.  What has made it worse is that the thugs haven't been allowed to perform their role of policing the game and now this type of "style" has been integrated into the game as an accepted tactic.  23 years ago Chris Chelios almost ended Brian Propp's career with a vicious elbow to the head and never even received a penalty for it.  The difference then was that Montreal (and specifically Chelios) spent the rest of that series looking over their shoulders for Dave Brown and as such played a pretty clean game for the rest of the playoffs, which probably in the end cost them the Stanley Cup against Calgary.





4/18/2012 1:57 AM
Posted by randle44 on 4/18/2012 12:10:00 AM (view original):
I think Torres hit was just as clean as Keith's  hit on Sedin..you know the one Muddy thinks was clean ? and yea Coyotes ! just scored as i type this...Nice!
Yeah but you're a dumbass, so it's easy to see why you would think that.
4/18/2012 12:29 PM
Posted by moy23 on 4/18/2012 12:46:00 AM (view original):
The craziest part........................   Torres who the Hawks LOATHE takes out a star like Hossa with a head shot and not one Hawk retaliates.  

That **** would never happen on the flyers. 
Bollig did and Torres turtled like a ****.  Too bad the Flyers are more concerned with their macho image than winning games.  In 2010, the Hawks were facing the same type of **** from people who thought they were soft and should retaliate.  They focused on their game instead and won the Cup.  Retaliating is stupid.  Winning isn't.
4/18/2012 5:08 PM
Posted by mudbone1969 on 4/18/2012 5:08:00 PM (view original):
Posted by moy23 on 4/18/2012 12:46:00 AM (view original):
The craziest part........................   Torres who the Hawks LOATHE takes out a star like Hossa with a head shot and not one Hawk retaliates.  

That **** would never happen on the flyers. 
Bollig did and Torres turtled like a ****.  Too bad the Flyers are more concerned with their macho image than winning games.  In 2010, the Hawks were facing the same type of **** from people who thought they were soft and should retaliate.  They focused on their game instead and won the Cup.  Retaliating is stupid.  Winning isn't.
Like the experts here are going to listen to a fair weather fan.
4/18/2012 5:15 PM
Fair weather since 1982!!
4/18/2012 5:36 PM
Not condoning the hit......But Keith's hit on Sedin was way worse.  This was much closer to a bodycheck than a blatant elbow to the head.....like Keith's cheapshot elbow on Sedin.  Retaliating is stupid???......But Sticking up for your team mate is in the HOCKEY CODE of ethics.  Maybe the Hawks should grow some ethics.
4/18/2012 7:21 PM
Ethics?  Go check a dictionary there, slim.
4/18/2012 7:54 PM
I find it hilarious a fan of a gutless cuntish team should talk about "ethics" when his team has none.  Just like they have no Cups.
4/18/2012 7:55 PM
And yes, retaliating is stupid.  When you win a hockey game based on how well you retaliate, I'll change my opinion.  Until then, it's stupid.
4/18/2012 7:56 PM
Posted by mudbone1969 on 4/18/2012 7:56:00 PM (view original):
And yes, retaliating is stupid.  When you win a hockey game based on how well you retaliate, I'll change my opinion.  Until then, it's stupid.
 I guess the fairweather fan cant turn off the price is right long enough to watch the Pitt/ Philly series?  talk about a dumbass
4/18/2012 8:18 PM
Someone let me know if randletard stops being a blatant retard.  Kthxbai
4/18/2012 8:29 PM
◂ Prev 1...231|232|233|234|235...249 Next ▸
STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS 2009-10 Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.