Posted by strikeout26 on 2/20/2018 8:25:00 PM (view original):
Tang, you struggle with critical thinking. You have a difficult time looking deeper into stats. Lower funded schools are in poor areas. This is because poor areas contribute less local dollars. This is because fewer people are working and there are more single parents. Funding is not the cause of poorer academic performance. You have your correlations confused. I believe this is because believing that people make bad choices is inconvenient to you. If parents put more emphasis on their kids academic success, the quality of the textbook would be irrelevant.
Please start thinking critically.
I disagree. Lower funded schools are in poor areas because of property taxes, less valuable homes = less school funding. But where we disagree is why people fall into poverty. Looking at it as single parenthood is narrow minded. Only one of the possible reasons.
So where I grew up, there were 7 elementary schools in the same city. When we all merged for middle school, it was clear that kids who went to two schools had a distinct advantage - 90% of honors and sports kids were from those two schools. Those two schools were in the wealthy part of the town. Is that because parents cared more in that part of the town? Was it because they had more money and were able to work less hours and spend more time with their kid? Was it because they were genetically better?
When I was in 6th grade, our class (which had lots of kids who had bad upbringings and emotional trauma) was so bad that one of our teachers left in the middle of the year, so we had 3 classes worth of kids stuck in 2 classrooms. The school was too poor to hire a replacement. Was that irrelevant on the quality of my education?
I had a friend whose mother was a single parent. She worked a ton of hours, and worked during the morning and afternoon so my family had to drive my friend to school. That mother cared about her son, however she was in an abusive relationship and had to get a divorce. Was she lazy? Should she have been a better mother?
If your argument is that people make bad choices which can affect their place in life, then I agree. If your argument is that kids who grow up with one parent are statistically worse off, then I agree. If your argument is that parents putting more time into their kids means more academic success, then I agree. If your argument is that single parents are lazy, then I disagree. If you are saying that funding has no correlation with academic performance, then I disagree.