FISA Memo Topic

Posted by The Taint on 2/5/2018 4:37:00 PM (view original):
yeah, this kinda felt like a swan song for them.
Yes. Gronk may leave; they need to rebuild that D and Amendola & Edelman are 32. If 2018 was not it then 2019 will definitely be it. Of course a replacement for TB12 needs to be found somewhere. There may be several painful seasons that the fans have to endure. But after 18 years of fun I can live with that. Especially because the Cs should be very good and fun to watch for the foreseeable future.
2/5/2018 4:46 PM
Posted by The Taint on 2/5/2018 4:37:00 PM (view original):
yeah, this kinda felt like a swan song for them.
don't count them out. as long as Brady and Belichek are there they are always in contention
2/5/2018 6:44 PM
I'm not positive BB is going to be around much longer.
2/5/2018 6:48 PM
Low and behold, the Dem memo contains sources and methods that will need to be redacted. Has not gone thru the vetting process the Repub memo went through...then perhaps we can see it.
2/6/2018 10:58 PM
That's good...the problem is, you don't know if you saw the memo Nunes offered to the congressman, or the one he offered to the president...2 different drafts. They voted on a different draft than he saw. TRANSPARENCY!
2/6/2018 11:05 PM
The changes requested by Schiff were typos and a 2 word change for accuracy.

Meanwhile Schiff ****** and moaned about his non vetted memo being voted down. Boo hoo
2/6/2018 11:32 PM
Hooligans are up 2-0...who knew? :)
2/6/2018 11:34 PM
Posted by DoctorKz on 2/6/2018 11:32:00 PM (view original):
The changes requested by Schiff were typos and a 2 word change for accuracy.

Meanwhile Schiff ****** and moaned about his non vetted memo being voted down. Boo hoo
I want everything released...then let's move on. Geez, enough already.
2/6/2018 11:35 PM
NEW FBI TEXTS IMPLICATE OBAMA!

RUSH: We now have more evidence via the text messages from Strzok and Lisa Page that this is all about Obama. That everything here is about protecting Obama, not just Hillary, in order to protect Obama. And I’m talking about the corruption that was the Obama presidency and specifically the corruption of the intelligence agencies and the FBI, well, the entire DOJ.

And I think one of the primary reasons they all wanted Hillary to win was to make sure we never knew any of what we now do know. That was the primary goal of having Hillary Clinton win was to be able to continue to mask and cover up and hide what Obama and his administration had been doing.

But in a text from Lisa Page to Strzok, she says it right there, “POTUS wants to know everything.” POTUS wants to be kept in the loop. Obama wants to know everything. “Newly revealed text messages between FBI paramours Peter Strzok and Lisa Page include an exchange about preparing talking points for then-FBI Director James Comey to give to President Obama, who wanted ‘to know everything we’re doing.’

“The message, from Page to Strzok, was among thousands of texts between the lovers reviewed by Fox News. The pair both worked at one point for Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Page wrote to Strzok on Sept. 2, 2016, about prepping Comey because ‘potus wants to know everything we’re doing.’ According to a newly released Senate report, this text raises questions about Obama’s personal involvement in the Clinton email investigation.”

Well, there’s some things we already know about that. We already know that Obama knew that she was running an illegal basement server out of her home in Chappaqua. And we know that he lied about knowing that. He told the nation that he didn’t find out about it until everybody else did, when watching the media.

But he knew she had the server because he was trafficking email back and forth to her — sending and receiving — knowing full well that the email address she was using did not come from the state.gov domain, state.gov meaning the State Department. The White House domain is eop.gov. Executive Office President. State.gov is State Department. We know that Obama told everybody. Obama pretty much told Comey and the FBI that Hillary was gonna be exonerated he publicly stated that he didn’t think she did anything wrong and she didn’t intend to do anything wrong.

And Obama’s losing through his teeth about saying he never tampered with the Justice Department. “Oh, no, there’s a line there we never cross.” I want to take you back, ladies and gentlemen, to yesterday on this program… Well, we don’t need to play it. To illustrate being on the cutting edge here: “We’re learning more and more every day of the corruption of the Obama administration. I think all of these efforts like the story, ‘The Smearing of Christopher Steele,'” which we had yesterday. The Politico had a story about all of these unfair “smear” stories of Christopher Steele.

Christopher Steele smeared Trump after being paid by Hillary Clinton to do it, and Obama was aware of it, because Obama was demanding to be kept in the loop. But even back in December… It might have been January 2017 on this program, a little over a year ago. We’re talking about the situation with Michael Flynn, and I remember saying even back then that I thought what all of this was about was protecting Obama. I have always believed that this is much more about Obama than Hillary. Hillary was the focus because she was the presidential candidate. But it was the Obama Regime, the administration which needed to be protected.



2/7/2018 8:37 PM
GUILTY AS SIN!

And all of the under-the-table dealings that had gone on needed to remain covered up and invisible. Let’s go to the audio sound bites from April of last year. This is Fox News Sunday. Chris Wallace is interviewing Obama. Question: “Some people are worried that the decision how to handle the case…” This is the Clinton email story. “Some people are worried that the decision how to handle the case will be made on political grounds, not legal grounds. Can you guarantee to the American people, Mr. Obama…? Can you direct the Justice Department to say Hillary Clinton will be treated as the evidence goes. She will not be in any way protected?”

OBAMA: I can guarantee that. And I can guarantee that not because I give, uh, Attorney General Lynch a directive. That is institutionally how we have always operated. I do not talk to the attorney general about pending investigations. I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations. We have a strict line, uh, and always have maintained it through this, previous presidents.

WALLACE: So just to button this up —

OBAMA: I guarantee it.

WALLACE: You?

OBAMA: I guarantee you that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department or the FBI, not just in this case, but in any case.

WALLACE: And she will be —

OBAMA: Full stop! Period!

WALLACE: And she will be treated no differently?

OBAMA: Guaranteed. Full stop. Nobody gets treated differently when it comes to the Justice Department because nobody is above the law.

WALLACE: Even if she ends up as the Democratic nom —

OBAMA: How many times do I have to say it, Chris? Guaranteed.

RUSH: Right. How many times did he say it? All right. Now let’s go to the next bite. Same show, April 10, 2016, Wallace says, “Last October, you said that Hillary Clinton’s private email server did not jeopardize national secrets. Since then we’ve learned that over 2,000 of her emails contain classified material. Twenty-two of the emails contained top secret information. Can you still say flatly that she did not jeopardize America’s secrets?”

OBAMA: Here’s what I know: Hillary Clinton was an outstanding secretary of state.

RUSH: Big whoop.

OBAMA: She would never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy.

RUSH: Big whoop.

OBAMA: And what I also know because I handle a lot of classified information, uh, is that there’s classified and then there’s classified. There’s stuff that is really top secret top secret —

RUSH: Yeah.

OBAMA: — and there’s stuff that is being presented to the president or the secretary of state that you might not want on the transom, uh, or, you know, going out over the wire but is basically stuff that you could get in open source.

RUSH: Okay. So let’s put this all together. Strzok texts, her to him, “We gotta get Comey fully up to speed because POTUS wants to know everything.” Meanwhile, Obama said, “Nah! There’s never, never any crossover. I never tell the DOJ what to do. I don’t care! I never interfere. There’s a line that we don’t cross. Guaranteed we don’t cross it. We never do cross it. I never tell Lynch; I never do anything.” But yet Lisa Page tells Strzok, “We gotta be thorough. POTUS wants to know everything.”

Why does he want to know everything? Then in that second bite, he declares Hillary Clinton innocent. And what he says is pretty much everything Comey said in that famous July 5th press conference where he exonerated her. (impression) “Here’s what I know. Hillary Clinton was a outstanding secretary of state, and she would never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy.” Exactly what Comey said. “We couldn’t find intent. She didn’t mean to do it! We couldn’t find any intent.”

And then start talking about the various degrees of classified documents. So Obama exonerates her. She didn’t do it. Well, when the president of the United States says she didn’t do it, that she is innocent, he has just told the Justice Department how to handle it, after swearing that he never would do anything like that. Here’s one final… No. Gotta take a break. There’s one more Obama bite on this. But the point here is that this is about protecting Obama. All of this is. It was Obama that was policing, directing, informing, permitting the spying and whatever else happened to Donald Trump and his campaign.

2/7/2018 8:39 PM
GRASSLY MEMO BOMBSHELL......WE'RE GOING AFTER THEM......JAIL TIME!

RUSH: The Charles Grassley and Lindsey Graham memo. This is a memo, it’s a criminal referral asking for a criminal investigation in the State Department. What was the State Department doing in all of this? Not just the FBI. The State Department where Hillary Clinton once prowled the corridors. Because in testimony before his committee, Senator Grassley has been able to confirm that Christopher Steele lied to the FBI. And that’s what he wants.

He wants a trial, a criminal investigation of Steele, the author of the dossier, for lying to the FBI. They’re putting everybody in jail for that. They put Martha Stewart in jail for it, they put Scooter Libby in jail for it, and Charles Grassley is asking why are we not trying to put Christopher Steele in jail? He lied to the FBI. What about? He lied to the FBI about his contact with Michael Isikoff at Yahoo News.

The Grassley memo confirms the Nunes memo, that the FBI misled the FISA court to obtain a surveillance warrant on a former Trump campaign adviser, Carter Page, who has never met Trump. Did you know that? Carter Page told George Stephanopoulos on ABC News (paraphrasing), “I’ve never even met Trump. I wasn’t a close adviser! All I ever did was go to Moscow once. But I am not a Trump adviser. I’ve not told him a thing. I don’t know him. I’ve never met him.”

So Christopher Steele, he lied to the FBI about his contact with Yahoo News. The circular route of this is this. In its FISA warrant application, the FBI includes the Steele dossier, but they do not say that Steele was paid to write this dossier by Hillary. They do not include in their application the political nature of this dossier. They pass it off as legitimate intel, not as opposition research.

ALSO DEM COUNTER MEMO TO BLOW UP IN THEIR FACES!

2/7/2018 8:47 PM
Bombshell!




Dud. Debunked
2/7/2018 8:49 PM
Posted by bronxcheer on 2/7/2018 8:49:00 PM (view original):
Bombshell!




Dud. Debunked
Post it or it didn't happen.

AND YOU CAN'T GO IT! Because todays memo hasn't been debunked. You're losing' it pal!

GO AHEAD! Post the rebuttal!

YOU CAN'T BECAUSE IT DOESN'T EXIST!
2/7/2018 8:54 PM
STEELE DOSSIER TOTALLY FAKE AND OBAMA AND LYNCH AND HILLARY AND COMEY KNEW IT!

To this day, my friends, — to this day — not a single element of this has been verified, and yet look at its seminal, central relevance and importance in virtually everything happening here to try to get Trump. And it is a thousand percent bogus. We didn’t know any of this a year ago. We had to dig this stuff up ourselves. None of what we know about this has come from the mainstream media, and that is very important. None of this has come from the New York Times; they’ve tried to hush it up. None of it has come from CNN; they’ve tried to discredit it.

None has come from the Washington Post; they’ve ignored it. None of what we know has come from a curious press trying to speak truth to power, hold powerful people accountable. That has not been happening, other than their attempt to checkmate Donald Trump. So now the Grassley memo — and let me just briefly summarize with the aid of the brilliant Kimberley Strassel at the Wall Street Journal. “1) Why isn’t the … Grassley memo front page news?

“Here’s why: Because it confirms the Nunes memo and blows up the Schiff talking points (which the media ran with). 2) It is confirmation that the FBI’s FISA application relied on the dossier and [the Yahoo N]ews article, and worse, on the credibility of a source in the employ of the Clinton campaign.” That’s Sidney Blumenthal. “The Clinton campaign.” Hillary Clinton herself is behind this dossier. She is behind the origination of the dossier. But Barack Obama can’t be far behind, because all of this is done to shield and protect Obama.

Hillary Clinton was to be elected to make sure we didn’t know any of what we know today, and to make sure that we don’t know what we are going to learn tomorrow and next week and next month. Hillary Clinton’s primary purpose — in Barack’s vision, anyway — was to protect all of this. We would never hear of the Strzok text messages. We would never know that this dossier was anything other than what they were lying to us about, that it was a legitimate bastion of intelligence. We wouldn’t know anything, if Hillary Clinton had been elected.

If Hillary Clinton had been elected, there would not be a single word of concern about Russian intervention unless the media wanted to use that to continue to discredit Trump so as to persuade future Trumps to never try this. But there would have never been any concern of Russian intervention if Hillary had won. We wouldn’t be anywhere near this. There wouldn’t be a special counsel looking into Russian interference, because they wouldn’t want to be doing anything to taint her glorious victory.

If there was any reference to Russia if the Clinton camp had won, there might be stories about how close we came. “The Russians almost elected Trump!” I could see them doing things like that, but we would not have claims that the Russians succeeded in tampering with our elections. None of this. There would not be a special counsel, unless, in victory, they wanted to pummel Trump into a grave by impaneling one to investigate his corruption/collusion with the Russians. Anything’s possible.

The Grassley memo “is proof that the FBI did not tell the [FISA] court the extraordinarily partisan provenance of the dossier,” their No. 1 exhibit. We’ve learned that “a source in the employ of the Clinton campaign” was informing Christopher Steele of events to put in the dossier. We now are very certain that that’s Sidney Blumenthal. The Charles Grassley memo, the request for an investigation of Steele memo, “provides evidence that the FBI presented the FISA court with materially false evidence.”

The Grassley memo confirms that the FISA court was lied to “in the claim that Steele had not talked to the press.” He had. He had talked to the press. It “shows that even after Steele admitted under oath that he had, the FBI did not tell the FISA court in its renewal” of the FISA warrant. The original application lied and said that Steele had not talked to the media about any of this. He had! He had given Isikoff the down and dirty on it, which resulted in Isikoff’s story at Yahoo.

2/7/2018 8:58 PM
◂ Prev 1...23|24|25|26|27|28 Next ▸
FISA Memo Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.