Unless you're in a 16 team league, there is no reason to have a Johnson/McFadden debate. There has to be a better option. LJ is new to the team. I can't imagine him getting anything but 3rd and 1 carries. Despite starting Gradkowski(like he's good or anything), I expect the Raiders to run a lot but Bush will get the carries. McFadden isn't 100%.

So you discount Brady's Super Bowl wins when he had to throw to Deion Branch, Troy Brown, and Christian Fauria?

Why not start Fargas over Bush?

Why are you not answering questions in the order in which they are received?

I took Minnesota in my suicide pool this week. Was this a good choice?

The world will not end in 2012.

I think so. Of course, it depends on what you define as "intelligent".

I'll need a definition of "intelligent".

Beer.

Not HBD success.

No, I do not.

Russell needs a kick in the ***. Benching him might be that kick. If it isn't, there's no point in keeping him. You need to know now not next season. Gradkowski won't be much of an improvement. But he can't be worse.

Aspirin, Tylenol, or Advil for a headache?

Did you like the movie Fast Times in Ridgemont High?

Are the Mets going to sign John Lackey?

Will the Knicks sign Iverson?

NE had a very good D then. As I said, Brady is good. But he only got in the same discussion as Manning when his WR became outstanding.

I like Bush over Vargas. Vargas is a 3rd back. Find out if Bush is the goods.

I think I am.

Minn should destroy Seattle.

Tylenol.

Yes.

No.

No.

The Nets are 0-12, do they beat the Knicks tomorrow night or will the losing streak continue?

How did Villanova hold off George Mason yesterday? Why can't they shoot free throws well?

Will Darius Hayward-Bey ever be a good WR?