If Trump were to receive the GOP nomination, 62 percent of Americans say they definitely would not consider voting for him. In contrast, just over 4 in 10 say they would definitely not consider voting for Clinton, Bush or Sanders.

Trump, however, could become a factor if he were to leave the GOP race and run for president as an independent. The survey shows that in a hypothetical three-way race, Clinton is at 46 percent, Bush is at 30 percent and Trump is at 20 percent among registered voters.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/poll-trump-surges-to-big-lead-in-gop-presidential-race/2015/07/20/efd2e0d0-2ef8-11e5-8f36-18d1d501920d_story.html



In short, if Trump is a factor, he's putting Hillary in the White House.  

STAY PUT, RAT-HAIRED BASTARD!

Posted by moy23 on 7/22/2015 8:47:00 AM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/22/2015 8:43:00 AM (view original):
Wait til Trump debates with them.    That will change.   And Hillary CRUSHES The Donald in a general election so you better hope people wise up.   

So, enjoy the circus, it's leading to Hillary for Prez. 

Notice trump hasn't bashed walker? I think walker gets the nomination once people see all the great things he's done in Wisconsin.

BETTER CHECK WALKER'S  VOTING DATA IN WISCONCIN--- SCOTTY KOCK WALKER GETS MOSTLY OLDER, WHITE SUPPORT IN ONE STATE. WAIT UNTIL HE HAS TO APPEAL TO LATINOS, WOMEN(HE IS GOING TO ALIENATE A LOT WITH HIS ABORTION-WOMAN'S PRIVACY ISSUES), YOUNG VOTERS AND ALL DARKIES

WALKER GETS CRUSHED NATIONALLY

Posted by bronxcheer on 7/22/2015 9:13:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 7/22/2015 8:47:00 AM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/22/2015 8:43:00 AM (view original):
Wait til Trump debates with them.    That will change.   And Hillary CRUSHES The Donald in a general election so you better hope people wise up.   

So, enjoy the circus, it's leading to Hillary for Prez. 

Notice trump hasn't bashed walker? I think walker gets the nomination once people see all the great things he's done in Wisconsin.

BETTER CHECK WALKER'S  VOTING DATA IN WISCONCIN--- SCOTTY KOCK WALKER GETS MOSTLY OLDER, WHITE SUPPORT IN ONE STATE. WAIT UNTIL HE HAS TO APPEAL TO LATINOS, WOMEN(HE IS GOING TO ALIENATE A LOT WITH HIS ABORTION-WOMAN'S PRIVACY ISSUES), YOUNG VOTERS AND ALL DARKIES

WALKER GETS CRUSHED NATIONALLY

He's also the only candidate that all factions of the Republican Party view favorably. That's a big plus.

Posted by moy23 on 7/22/2015 12:18:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/21/2015 11:49:00 PM (view original):
I wouldn't say that. 16 presidents were senators before becoming president. How many modern presidents had zero political experience?

There's a difference between being a relatively inexperienced senator and being a complete novice.

whats the difference?

Complete novices don't win presidential elections.

Or even get nominated.

I think you have to go back to the 1940 election to find a major party nominee who wasn't a governor/senator/US rep prior to running for president.

Posted by tecwrg on 7/22/2015 8:21:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/21/2015 11:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 7/21/2015 11:24:00 PM (view original):
And he's done a ****** job as President.

Lol. You know aren't actually going to make an argument, so you should probably bail out now.

****** job with foreign policy, clueless with respect to the military, and Obamacare has been a clusterfuck of a non-solution to the real problems with healthcare in the US.

Other than than . . .

His foreign policy is probably the strongest argument against him and even that, when viewed through a non-partisan lens, is probably C+/B-.

I don't know what "clueless with respect to the military" even means.

Obamacare has been somewhat of a success.

Nice try though.

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/22/2015 9:02:00 AM (view original):

If Trump were to receive the GOP nomination, 62 percent of Americans say they definitely would not consider voting for him. In contrast, just over 4 in 10 say they would definitely not consider voting for Clinton, Bush or Sanders.

Trump, however, could become a factor if he were to leave the GOP race and run for president as an independent. The survey shows that in a hypothetical three-way race, Clinton is at 46 percent, Bush is at 30 percent and Trump is at 20 percent among registered voters.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/poll-trump-surges-to-big-lead-in-gop-presidential-race/2015/07/20/efd2e0d0-2ef8-11e5-8f36-18d1d501920d_story.html



In short, if Trump is a factor, he's putting Hillary in the White House.  

Donald Trump speaks out about his campaign.

tec doesn't know that the onion is fake.

Posted by bad_luck on 7/22/2015 1:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 7/22/2015 8:21:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/21/2015 11:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 7/21/2015 11:24:00 PM (view original):
And he's done a ****** job as President.

Lol. You know aren't actually going to make an argument, so you should probably bail out now.

****** job with foreign policy, clueless with respect to the military, and Obamacare has been a clusterfuck of a non-solution to the real problems with healthcare in the US.

Other than than . . .

His foreign policy is probably the strongest argument against him and even that, when viewed through a non-partisan lens, is probably C+/B-.

I don't know what "clueless with respect to the military" even means.

Obamacare has been somewhat of a success.

Nice try though.

How has "Obamacare been somewhat of a success"?

Has it done ANYTHING to make healthcare more affordable, other than subsidize it for some people?  (The answer is: "No.  No, it hasn't").

Posted by bad_luck on 7/22/2015 1:14:00 PM (view original):
tec doesn't know that the onion is fake.

Dumbass.

Posted by tecwrg on 7/22/2015 1:15:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/22/2015 1:14:00 PM (view original):
tec doesn't know that the onion is fake.

Dumbass.

Don't call yourself a dumbass. Fox News made the same mistake. It happens.

Posted by tecwrg on 7/22/2015 1:15:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/22/2015 1:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 7/22/2015 8:21:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/21/2015 11:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 7/21/2015 11:24:00 PM (view original):
And he's done a ****** job as President.

Lol. You know aren't actually going to make an argument, so you should probably bail out now.

****** job with foreign policy, clueless with respect to the military, and Obamacare has been a clusterfuck of a non-solution to the real problems with healthcare in the US.

Other than than . . .

His foreign policy is probably the strongest argument against him and even that, when viewed through a non-partisan lens, is probably C+/B-.

I don't know what "clueless with respect to the military" even means.

Obamacare has been somewhat of a success.

Nice try though.

How has "Obamacare been somewhat of a success"?

Has it done ANYTHING to make healthcare more affordable, other than subsidize it for some people?  (The answer is: "No.  No, it hasn't").

The uninsured rate has dropped significantly.

Posted by bad_luck on 7/22/2015 1:20:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 7/22/2015 1:15:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/22/2015 1:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 7/22/2015 8:21:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/21/2015 11:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 7/21/2015 11:24:00 PM (view original):
And he's done a ****** job as President.

Lol. You know aren't actually going to make an argument, so you should probably bail out now.

****** job with foreign policy, clueless with respect to the military, and Obamacare has been a clusterfuck of a non-solution to the real problems with healthcare in the US.

Other than than . . .

His foreign policy is probably the strongest argument against him and even that, when viewed through a non-partisan lens, is probably C+/B-.

I don't know what "clueless with respect to the military" even means.

Obamacare has been somewhat of a success.

Nice try though.

How has "Obamacare been somewhat of a success"?

Has it done ANYTHING to make healthcare more affordable, other than subsidize it for some people?  (The answer is: "No.  No, it hasn't").

The uninsured rate has dropped significantly.

So no, other than subsidizing healthcare for some people, Obamacare has NOT done anything to make healthcare more affordable.

Thanks for the confirmation.

The main goal of obamacare was to provide access to insurance to people who didn't have access before.

Posted by bad_luck on 7/22/2015 1:37:00 PM (view original):
The main goal of obamacare was to provide access to insurance to people who didn't have access before.

It was also supposed to make healthcare more affordable to those who already had healthcare insurance.

How has that worked out?