Quote: Originally Posted By furry_nipps on 12/29/2009

Quote: Originally posted by mlatsko1 on 12/29/2009 Back peddle faster. Cheater.

Tell me what unfair advantage I gained out of it. I'd love to hear it.

Quote: Originally Posted By furry_nipps on 12/29/2009
If you think that is bad you should see all the other flaws/loop holes that I and many other coaches use to better our teams

Big talker? Or Cheater? Hmmm...

Quote: Originally posted by mlatsko1 on 12/29/2009 "If you need to manage minutes toss it on him and take it off at the end of the year. I did it the last 2 seasons to FR that I promised mins to (my pg had 30 min/start last year I did it to make him no transfer"

Clearly NOT the intended means to get 30+Start.

Quote: Originally posted by furry_nipps on 12/29/2009Nope, works great. Because they practice shortly after the game you can take it off right after the game and have his WE go back up. Practice will look at him like he has full WE thus you get full improvements without him playing. I only did it about 5 times with him last season, but because practice happens so fast the time frame forced me to have to stay up later then what I was willing to so I stopped doing it.

Clearly NOT intended use.

Cheater.

Then wis should fix the transfers. Not my fault that he had a 30 min/start promise and he was okay with playing in 7 games and no starts. I guess it is not a good time to say 2 seasons ago (both JR bigs) were promised a start (no minutes) and I played them both only half the season. 17 and 18 games played each, with 16/14 starts and neither complained. Maybe, just maybe WIS should up transfers and adjust how people complain about not getting there minutes. If they were actually willing to have real people test the game these things would be working properly. If they want the game fixed, then they can site mail me to test all there issues and I can point them out sense clearly nobody else can find them.

This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.

This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.

Quote: Originally posted by mlatsko1 on 12/29/2009 "If you need to manage minutes toss it on him and take it off at the end of the year. I did it the last 2 seasons to FR that I promised mins to (my pg had 30 min/start last year I did it to make him no transfer"

Clearly NOT the intended means to get 30+Start.

Quote: Originally posted by furry_nipps on 12/29/2009Nope, works great. Because they practice shortly after the game you can take it off right after the game and have his WE go back up. Practice will look at him like he has full WE thus you get full improvements without him playing. I only did it about 5 times with him last season, but because practice happens so fast the time frame forced me to have to stay up later then what I was willing to so I stopped doing it.

Clearly NOT intended use.

Cheater.

WIS has been on record to saying you do not need to live up to promises. That is exactly what I did. I couldn't give him his promise, and I risked him getting mad (which he didn't do)


Again, call it whatever you want. I promise people every season, and I don't recall the last time I fully lived up to it. I've had some transfer, but most the time they don't. You are complaining to the wrong person. WIS has a lot of room for improvement. If they want to fix things, I think this would be near the bottom of there list. Pull downs, practice times at the point are the worst issues that give the biggest advantage. IMO, signing a FR to play 3 seasons would be at the bottom. I am not sure what advantage it gives other then to sign a player for cheaper, or to help win a close battle. Bigger issues to fix, IMO.

This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.

Quote: Originally posted by furry_nipps on 12/29/2009Bigger issues to fix, IMO.

Perma-banning Cheaters like you would be my highest priority.

This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.

This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.

This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.

This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.

mlat, question: Do you view boosters and pulldowns as cheating? They are a built in part of the game and are meant to be used by coaches, that would mean they are not cheating correct?

Cheating

All owners must play by the rules and requirements set forth by each game on our site. If an owner discovers a loophole, a way to cheat, or any other method of giving himself an unfair advantage, WhatIfSports reserves the right to take the necessary steps to correct the issue at any time without prior notification. Refunds or roster changes will not be given to any owner in this situation.


Since these are built into the game they would, therefore not be cheating, correct? They are part of the rules of the game and for boosters specifically there are risks/rewards built in.

Exploiting promises/redshirts are not part of the game.

Quote: Originally Posted By furry_nipps on 12/29/2009
Promises/redshirts are not part of the game? News to me.

Is colonels your alt? Because just like him you missed the entire substance of my post.

I do believe that those are built in parts of the game that are intended to be there.