Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 1/16/2010Quote: Originally posted by a_in_the_b on 1/16/2010COlonels, its only a problem when you, wrongly, view the aggregate Ratings number as a ironclad indicator of how suited a team is to winning in general, much less winning a specific game.Funny how a minute ago he was saying it shouldn't happen because of past results and now he is harping on the ratings? Your arguments get progressively more amusing. Both reasons (past performance and OTRs) support that this shouldn't have happened, and I said that earlier. If you think you're getting 1UP on me, you're clearly missing your mark.And what I find even better is the fact that after 48932473289427 pages in that one thread he still forgets numerous things, including playing time, ratings aren't equal and the coach's game plan, among many other things. Yep, that'll make up 27 buckets...It all just goes to show that this guy talks a big game for something he knows so little about. It is you, zhawks, who doesn't see the bizarreness of the situation.
Quote: Originally posted by a_in_the_b on 1/16/2010COlonels, its only a problem when you, wrongly, view the aggregate Ratings number as a ironclad indicator of how suited a team is to winning in general, much less winning a specific game.
Quote: Originally Posted By a_in_the_b on 1/16/2010IN real life, COlonels, teams rarely make as extreme strategic adjustments as they do here. Virginia wasn't that far from being 6 - 10 in conference. I love when people do this kind of stuff..."well they almost won..." yeah, but they didn't...no matter how you slice it, they're 0-16 Also., . . .often on the sim games turn into blowouts because coaches don't have the bench cleared where in real life, they woudl be playing the waterboy and the gap woudl be closed
Quote: Originally Posted By a_in_the_b on 1/16/20101998, Chicago Vs Utah: Chicago wn one game by 42 points, yet Utah also won twice
Quote: Originally Posted By a_in_the_b on 1/16/2010And that argument, Colonels, is silly,.End of story. The job of a simulat5ion, however it does it, is to model the real life behaviour of a system. . .including having those sorts of results.
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 1/16/2010Quote: Originally Posted By a_in_the_b on 1/16/2010And that argument, Colonels, is silly,.End of story. The job of a simulat5ion, however it does it, is to model the real life behaviour of a system. . .including having those sorts of results.If you don't understand how real life is more random than this game, then I can't help you and as usual, I'm done "debating" with you. You bring nothing
Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement
© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.