Dynamic Elite System (Collaborative) Topic

Quote: Originally posted by moranis on 2/22/2010 but there will always be at least one elite with a greater prestige then a 4 time defending non-elite BCS school).

Is that something you know or you think?

I haven't played HD but everyone seems to like that system and it sounds like the best way to go.
2/22/2010 9:59 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By ebel331 on 2/22/2010
Quote: Originally posted by moranis on 2/22/2010 but there will always be at least one elite with a greater prestige then a 4 time defending non-elite BCS school).

Is that something you know or you think?

Does anyone really know anything about the game, but from everything I've seen or experienced that would be an accurate statement.
2/22/2010 10:01 PM
What have you seen or experienced that would lead you to believe that? Have you recruited from even a 1-time champion BCS school against an Elite or vice versa?

BOOGEY BOOGEY BOOGEY! Elite Gon Git Ya!
2/22/2010 10:11 PM
Not trying to sidetrack your thread GT, just think it would be helpful to know how the current system worked.
2/22/2010 10:17 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By gt_deuce on 2/22/2010Elite status eligibility will be determined by some minimum score (formula referenced above). If an Elite falls below that threshold AND a non-Elite has a score above it, the non-Elite would become Elite and the Elite would become non-Elite. Let's give two unbalanced examples:

1) Let's say two Elites drop below Elite status, but only one non-Elite goes above Elite status. In that case, only the lowest-score Elite of the two would lose their status and the one non-Elite would gain it.

2) Let's say one Elite drops below, but two non-Elite go above. In this case, the highest-scoring non-Elite would gain Elite status and the Elite would lose it. The second-place non-Elite would have to wait.

That is a lot of words to say: "Take the highest 14 scores"
2/22/2010 10:20 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By tarheel1991 on 2/22/2010unclevic - can you actually find instances of teams like Boise, Kansas, Air Force, Iowa St, Troy St actually winning enough games/championships/high bowls to qualify for elite status? I would be surprised if you find any sort of consistent run of success for those teams in a mature world.


Why does this have to be overcomplicated?All that really needs to be done is to take the elite distinction out of a sliding scale. Make a dynamic prestige system where (and this is just arbitrarily using a scale to 100) a non-BCS school can range anywhere from 30-70, and a BCS school can range anywhere from 55-100 or so. All you need is some overlap to allow for good non-BCS and bad BCS programs, just program in some kind of multiplier to determine non-BCS prestige as compared BCS prestige. No elite distinction needed. It works at all the other levels without an elite distinction; it should be easy as heck to implement at DIA. No need to clarify which schools are elite at which times; just leave it like all the other levels, where owners can figure out who the "elite" programs are by looking at the level of recent success.

Then all you have to do is announce a date when you're switching to the new system (probably something like 3 months, aka 2 seasons, in advance) and say "at that point, DIA will switch over to an elite-free prestige system, and prestige at that point will be computed the same as other divisions, with a .75 multiplier applied to non-BCS schools to determine their prestige." If an elite has been very successful recently, nothing changes; if the elite has been average, they'll be looking at lower prestige. And so on and so forth for non-elites; if someone like Rutgers has 4 conf titles and 3 level 5 bowl wins in the last 5 years they'll probably have a very high status.

Then, you tie firings to prestige in an inverse relationship; the higher the prestige, harder it is to keep a job. WIS creates levels within the prestige (IMO they should be hidden levels, like prestige itself, but that's debatable - you could have an AD send you a message that says something like "due to our recent success, we have very high standards/sky high standards/average standards, etc.) and when the prestige crosses that line the job becomes harder to keep. You can leave the old "prestige doesn't change for first 2/3 years if win total/WIS ranking goes up" or whatever, but clearly the standards in general have to be toughened.

This could be a little tricky; you probably have to judge the coach for hiring/firing based on what prestige was when he got the job (aka a coach starts with 100 prestige, so difficult to keep the job; he has a bad season, prestige falls to 90, suddenly the job is technically easier to keep because prestige has fallen) or you just have to lag the hiring/firing prestige like two seasons behind real prestige (team reaches 100 prestige in season 41, but firing standards don't reach that toughest level in 43 or 44, for example).


So I hope that's clear enough; others can flesh it out or ask questions if it's confusing. Making fluid elite status is easy, because it just means mirroring the other levels; it's making the firing/hiring standards just as fluid that will be tougher.
This is the best idea by far in my opinion, it works at all other levels. I think the current elites would still be the elites for the most part in this system as most people would gravitate towards them, but at least it would be earned status.
2/22/2010 11:43 PM
how about a 32 team tournament at the end of each season with Elite status depending on how far you go & if you miss the tourney your not Elite?
2/22/2010 11:58 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By willgibson on 2/22/2010I'd like to see tweaks on scheduling where rejecting challenges carries some sort of penalty
so another coach has to accept your challenge or be penalized...really?
2/23/2010 12:41 AM
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
2/23/2010 12:42 AM
There was a time when Harvard was King. They were Elite. Those days are gone.

There was a time (it was called 1910) when Alabama was not an Elite.

Notre Dame has fallen by the wayside, but may well emerge again as an Elite.

Who was USC in the 20's and 30's? Who was Florida in the 50's and 60's?

Nope. There is no possible way that any school could become Elite, nor is there any possible way a team could lose Eliteness. Never happened in real life. I mean, except for the above examples and numerous others not shown here. Except for those, it just can't happen.

I think a New Coach would be more understanding that a 130-0 over 10 Seasons Troy State is considered an Elite than say a Notre Dame that is 65-65 over the same 10 Seasons being considered an Elite.
2/23/2010 1:30 AM
I'd propose the sliding scale of prestige, with the top cap on non BCS schools just below the overall max, and the bottom cap on current elites being quite high. A bottom cap would be rewquired because frankly you need to account for all levels of schools.

For example, on a scale of 1-1000, D3 schools might be 1-300, D2 schools 250-550, D1AA 500-800, D1A non-BCS 750-950, BCS 850-1000, Elites 925-1000.
2/23/2010 1:51 AM
Quote: Originally posted by bhazlewood on 2/23/2010I'd propose the sliding scale of prestige, with the top cap on non BCS schools just below the overall max, and the bottom cap on current elites being quite high. A bottom cap would be rewquired because frankly you need to account for all levels of schools.For example, on a scale of 1-1000, D3 schools might be 1-300, D2 schools 250-550, D1AA 500-800, D1A non-BCS 750-950, BCS 850-1000, Elites 925-1000.


I don't know for sure, and your guess is as good as mine, but I assumed that each school has the the same range on the scale. My understanding was its a bar that you can move up and down the scale, but not expand the bar. That is just my understanding. I tried to go back and find the exact quote from Joe in the council but its either outdated or gone, either way I could not find the quote.
2/23/2010 5:38 AM
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
2/23/2010 7:43 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By ebel331 on 2/22/2010What have you seen or experienced that would lead you to believe that? Have you recruited from even a 1-time champion BCS school against an Elite or vice versa?

BOOGEY BOOGEY BOOGEY! Elite Gon Git Ya
look at historical recruiting classes, look at historical teams, look at long time great coaches at non-elite BCS teams, for example Plague in Camp at Syracuse, I've had numerous tickets with conte, and on and on.

The system greatly favors elites both by design and practice. Anyone who says otherwise just isn't living in reality.
2/23/2010 7:46 AM
if we are talking about reforming the elite system, why continue to artificially keep the non-BCS schools down? Allow all DIA schools the possibility to have the highest prestige.
2/23/2010 8:11 AM
◂ Prev 12345 Next ▸
Dynamic Elite System (Collaborative) Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.