Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 3/05/2010
Quote: Originally Posted By dalter on 3/05/2010
What don't you understand here?
The other team had better talent, so saying they have no business to beat you or shoot well is absurd. 60% beyond the arc...give me a break...I wasn't playing -5.
You put together a bad game plan, failing to adjust from your first meeting. Why would you adjust the gameplan when you won the first game on the road by 21...against a sim no less?
It's pretty simple, and it wasn't even close to a ridiculous result. If it makes you feel better to cling to that ridiculous notion despite the fact that numerous experienced coaches have stepped in to point out the reality, well, I can't stop you from that. There are guys here that will attempt to explain away anything, and the fact that its me bringing this up probably has something to do with the responses as well. I think this is a clear case of the sim taking a s*** on somebody/me. I was up 14 in the 2nd half when the sim said "Hold on colonels, you're losing today". Given the team's record and the result of game 1...this result is rather bogus, and I think its clear to see where my frustration stems from.
Shooting 59% for a single game just isn't that crazy, particularly considering that the two guys that did it for him overmatched your guys.
You would adjust the gameplan even after winning the first time because there were some things that you did very poorly that you could've and should've corrected, like defending the three.
You're pulling out single stats like "If I told you that I won the TO battle by 11 ..." that are beyond meaningless. Simmy could say, "Could you believe I carved him up like that from 3p and barely won ..." One or two stats don't determine the game, it's a moronic thing to even attempt to point out.
And, oh yeah ... their team is better than yours.
And they have a better coach.