Quote: Originally Posted By mmt0315 on 5/28/2010
Quote: Originally Posted By dalter on 5/28/2010
Honestly, I'm dumbfounded that there were vets out there who didn't expect that there would be tweaks after the roll-out. I'm not saying that makes it perfect or even right, but I'm really thrown by any vet who is surprised by it ... as I tell people all the time at work, it's all about managing expectations.
(Not to say that we should expect little, only that the expectations should be pragmatic and attuned to reality ... my expectations for what the engine will look like after a month or two was always much higher than what it would look like after a day or two.)
Thats what you call this? Youre quickly losing credibility; a team having 7-8 players fouling out is not tweaks. Players entering a 2nd half at "tired" is not tweaks. Completely killing a defense (whether people think it should exist in the first place is another question as if its an option it should work in line with other defenses) is not tweaks. This is an engine that shouldnt be rolled out; it shouldnt require such dramatic changes within days of being released; it should not require the entire world being paused because there are so many issues with the engine. And worst of all we should not be their guine pigs forced to pay to test the product. They should be ashamed for how this has been handled.
This started with beta testing. There was no communication and games wouldnt be simmed for weeks; I'd log in for days on end and nothing; suddenly 10 games were simmed in a day with no notice. Of course people lost interest and didnt participate. Your "dumbfounded"? Im dumbfounded that you cant see these things.
Easy. Of course I see them. You know that I was a loud voice in the beta test, and most of that was me being critical. ("Most" might be an understatement, lol.)
I agree that they shouldn't have rolled out the engine when they did. But if they get it under control in relatively short order -- and I'm starting to develop a cautious optimism that they will -- then I will be OK. If we're still having these conversations all summer, that's where they'll really lose me.
I don't disagree with anything you said about the beta not being well run, etc. But I'm encouraged by seble's willingness and ability to make the necessary tweaks to improve. We literally played 1-2 regular season games in a couple of worlds before that was done, so the damage hardly qualifies as catastrophic, or anything close.
As much as anything, I want to see the game grow and improve, and a constant negative tone in the forums is anathema to that sort of progress. That is
not to say that I won't be critical -- anyone who's been around knows that couldn't be further from the truth -- only that right now my focus on being constructive rather than negative. (That's not to say that your criticisms aren't valid, because I largely agree and believe they are.)
Hope that clarifies where I'm coming from.