Quote: Originally Posted By mmt0315 on 5/28/2010
Yes, stop rolling out the new engine into worlds until it is stabalized.

or

No, continue to roll it out as is.

Please copy/paste one as your reply.



I think the choices would flow better if they were:

Yes, keep the new engine rolling

or

No, stop the engines

----------

Quote: Originally posted by mmt0315 on 5/28/2010Clearly, but it does have to do with the management of the game as a hole. Look, weve discussed many things in two threads and Im trying to reply to everyone. The fact that I might have mispoken as to one fact does not diminish the underlying point.

Quote: Originally posted by a_in_the_b on 5/28/2010
Given your behavior in this thread who the he** are you to criticize someone ELSE'S way of 'discussing' things???

Quote: Originally posted by mmt0315 on 5/28/2010please explain to me where Im being clueless?

Quote: Originally Posted By hughesjr on 5/28/2010OK ... so sully, we have established that you think WIS is broken beyond repair. Then why are you still playing

Quote: Originally Posted By antonsirius on 5/28/2010

Quote: Originally posted by mmt0315 on 5/28/2010 Clearly, but it does have to do with the management of the game as a hole. Look, weve discussed many things in two threads and Im trying to reply to everyone. The fact that I might have mispoken as to one fact does not diminish the underlying point.

It does if you keep changing the underlying point.

In this thread and the other, your complaint was that the new engine was not "stable". As evidence, you cited what happened in Knight. When it was pointed out that what happened in Knight had nothing to do with the new engine, you now say your complaint is with 'the management of the game as a whole'.

This is your typical standard self serving way of having a discussion. 1) My point (my underlying point which is why I was ****** in the other thread) is the entire approach to things. A seperate point which is in fact related is the engine is not stable. As explained by the extreme difference between the initial roll out and all the changes. 2) You decide to jump and harp on Knight, despite the fact that the new programming impacted an old world.

Which is it? Is your issue that you don't believe the new engine is stable? Or that you have no confidence in seble to produce a solid engine? Because they are very different things.

It has to do with the entire roll-out of the new engine, I dont know how to make it more clear...As a result of that...I dont believe the new engine is stable and have provided evidence as to why...you think it is stable and have provided your own reasoning...we dont agree its not the end of the world...you want to nitpick the small things while ignoring the big things...you throw out 5 different points I respond in turn to each...you harp on a minute detail of one ignoring the rest...you then make generalizations and insulting comments...its your MO.

Quote: Originally Posted By antonsirius on 5/28/2010

Quote: Originally posted by mmt0315 on 5/28/2010 please explain to me where Im being clueless

I, uhh, already did. Thanks for proving my point though