Posted by swamphawk22 on 6/30/2011 3:55:00 AM (view original):
Posted by antonsirius on 6/29/2011 7:59:00 PM (view original):
No, liar, they didn't say Palin didn't represent women.
Actually they said she doesnt represent us as Americans Women.
So from that we can assume that she feels that Palin does not represent women.
I cant believe you went through all the work of poking your head out of your hole for this!
That's a stretch Swamp.
The more reasonable view is to take the Wilsons at their word. It would be up to you to back up that assumption. You could be right, but since the assumption is yours, you should be able to provide reasons why that assumption can be valid.
My only problem with all of this is that the Wilsons sold their recording. Are they (and others) saying that people can't play their purchased copy of recorded music at events, rallies, parties, etc.? That's probably worth discussion. Does a painter have a right to tell someone they cannot display their purchased copy at a venue or event of their choosing?
Suppose a photographer shoots and sells a photograph of beautiful scenic countryside. I'm a business owner; I like the shot, purchase it, and then display it in my lobby. The photographer hates my company because I'm a not "green" enough corporation. Does he have a right to tell me where I can display my rightfully purchased item?