Sorry we nixed that trade... have the #1 pick Topic

Posted by ashamael on 6/2/2012 2:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by badja on 5/31/2012 11:12:00 PM (view original):
Back to the topic at hand, the lottery worked perfectly.  What's the problem?  A team with a very high % chance got the top pick.  That's exactly why there is a lottery to begin with. 

Thank God the Bobcat's didn't get Davis.
Just found it somewhat funny that the team the NBA owns won the lottery.  <conspiracy theory here>

@deanod - I don't think they got that good a deal with the trade they ended up with.  Maybe Eric Gordon gets healthy and proves me wrong... but thus far he hasn't really been steady at all.  Kaman was the best part of that deal and they basically got him for the expiring contract...  not that the other trade was that much better, but I really think they got **** on with this deal.  At least they got the 10th pick /shrug
That's a bit results oriented for a number of reasons

1) They didn't trade for Greg Oden- nobody thought that EG would miss the entire season
2) T'Wolves were supposed to be worse than 10th worst team itl
3) Even though T'Wolves pick was #10 it still had a non-zero chance at top 3

It's really hard to get a solid return when a superstar has you over a barrel, there's still plenty of time for Gordon to bounce back and have a very good career and at least the 10th pick is something.  Gordon is like the best possible player still on his rookie deal they could have acquired, it hasn't worked out thus far but there was no way they could have rec'd a better return w/o the lense of hindsight

OTOH, they couldn't have gotten a worse return than the scola/odom/kevmart.
6/4/2012 8:36 AM
once again... it comes down to opinion and what shade glasses you wear.
6/5/2012 11:38 AM

Not really.

You can say whatever you'd like and address it as "a matter of opinion" but opinions can most certainly be wrong.  There's an underlying objectivity to everything, especially stuff like "how positively/negatively impactful is player X to team Y." 

You are entitled to believe whatever the hell you want, but if you chalk things up to opinion then you're just giving yourself a free pass to have un-sharp perspectives that quite honestly do not align with the truth.

Shade glasses nails it though- pretty much any sports disagreement is going to revolve around pre-existing biases.  My shades are clear btw, and at this moment in time they are like sparkly, shiny, crystal clear.

6/5/2012 11:55 AM
No, I'm giving myself a free pass not to waste more time so I can see you repeatedly say the same thing.  I get what you think is the truth.  And because you think it, it must be so.  I've gone down this road before and saw what happened.  So... have fun arguing with yourself on this one. /shrug
6/5/2012 8:41 PM
Posted by earlmantis on 6/3/2012 11:43:00 PM (view original):
Posted by malone9975 on 6/3/2012 2:39:00 PM (view original):
Posted by earlmantis on 6/2/2012 10:16:00 PM (view original):
I'm honestly asking this question and not being a jerkoff.  How many people would have to be involved with this "rigging" of the ping pong balls when every team has a rep watching the drawing.  I understand and have heard that the balls can be weighted etc etc but again, how many people behind the scenes would have to be involved in that process and then told to shut up about it forever?
Ask the Knicks in 85, they might know.
First off Malone, I hate you now more than ever.  Secondly, in 85 each team had only 1 card I believe in a bowl and God knows if it was witnessed by a rep of every team. That would have been much easier to rig when Stern wasn't under scrutiny for fixing things in the league. This time around I find it very hard to believe. To Ash, I hear ya but guess what, people believe it was rigged.
It's good to still be loved by you earl. I subscribe to the cold envelope theory in the 85 draft.

To answer you prior question about how many would have to be involved...G Gordon Liddy said every good conspiracy needs three people and then two of then have to be dead.
6/6/2012 2:04 AM
◂ Prev 123
Sorry we nixed that trade... have the #1 pick Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.