Posted by MikeT23 on 11/19/2015 8:48:00 AM (view original):
They certainly do. Bombard dwoolery with emails and sitemails. If you have his phone number, call him on the hour, every hour. But fix your goddam damaged product while waiting for him to respond. There are 31 paying customers who are being affected, in some way, by their hesitation to do what one paying customer asked them to do(which was replace him).
Your point is stupid. It's just a contrarian stance for the sake of being contrarian. If you were trying to replace an owner who asked to be replaced, you'd want it done. Now and not after you jumped thru hoops so they could find out WHY he wanted to be replaced not THAT he wanted to be replaced. Do you not understand the difference? Do you really think he DOESN'T want to be replaced? Any answer other than "I don't know that for sure" proves you're just arguing to argue. And "I don't know that for sure" would prove you are incapable of reasonable thought.
OK, I must have missed the announcement from WIS of the addition to the TOS that miket23 gets to determine the level of evidence needed for WIS to be comfortable replacing an owner, who should be responsible for obtaining that evidence, and the time frame in which that should occur.
Nowhere in the purchase agreement does it say abandoned owners will be replaced after 14 days of not checking in without further question. It does say that the owner who purchased the team is paying money in exchange for a 162 game season. If they want additional confirmation that the owner agrees to terminating that agreement, that's their right. And it's really not their duty to obtain that additional confirmation. It is their duty to uphold the agreement and fulfill the service that was promised when the team was purchased of a 162 game season.
I actually do think the owner wanted to be replaced. All I'm saying is I don't think it is unreasonable for WIS to ask for additional confirmation and while it would be great customer service for them to be the ones to reach out to him to get it, I don't think they are obligated.