Posted by bad_luck on 1/30/2018 10:11:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 1/30/2018 10:07:00 AM (view original):
Didn't they hire Fusion GPS? Instead of piece mailing me tell me what I got wrong.

Even if that were true, Fusion isn’t the FBI. The FBI investigation started independently of the steele dossier.

Yup, they met in the middle.

Posted by bad_luck on 1/30/2018 10:12:00 AM (view original):

The memo is not limited to actions taken by the Obama administration, though. The New York Times reported on Sunday that the memo reveals that Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, a top Trump appointee, signed off an application to extend the surveillance of Mr. Page shortly after taking office last spring. The renewal shows that the Justice Department under Mr. Trump saw reason to believe that Mr. Page was acting as a Russian agent.

The inclusion of Mr. Rosenstein’s action in the memo could expose him to a torrent of criticism from Republicans on Capitol Hill and from conservatives in the news media who have seized on the surveillance to argue that the Russia investigation may have been tainted from the start. Mr. Rosenstein is overseeing that investigation because Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself. It was Mr. Rosenstein who appointed Robert S. Mueller III as special counsel.

That’s from the NYT.

Rosenstein is is a Trump appointee. The fact that he thought the surveillance on Page was necessary and legal is not a good thing for Trump.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/12/01/timeline-events-related-russia-investigation/914959001/


This is a pretty spot on timeline of everything that has gone down, though It's missing a bunch of earlystuff on how Trump has been running in Russian circles since 2003(Felix Sater...who he denied even being able to recognize). LOL

It also doesn't cover his Miss Universe crap and the fixing of one of the pageants for Putin's girlfriend.

I think you two are incorrect. So let's see what the released material illustrates. Otherwise everyone is just speculating here.

Please tell me both of you are rooting against the Pats this Sunday.

Incorrect about what? LOL.


I'm rooting for my $1,000 a square pool numbers.

$1k!!?!?! You're rich.

I think it is as I laid out. But I could also be completely wrong. Since I don't trust any politician I just want to see the facts for myself. Why are you so against that?

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/12/07/rep_jim_jordan_grills_fbi_director_wray_about_peter_strzok.html

Is this not what the released materials will be shedding the light on?

Posted by cccp1014 on 1/30/2018 10:20:00 AM (view original):
$1k!!?!?! You're rich.

I think it is as I laid out. But I could also be completely wrong. Since I don't trust any politician I just want to see the facts for myself. Why are you so against that?

What facts do you think a memo written by Nunes will expose? The guy is clearly running defense for Trump.

What you “laid out” is a fundamental misunderstanding of what’s going on. You pretend to be smart but you’re actually dumb.

If you don't trust any politician why would you trust a document prepared totally by a politician known for his hyper-partisanship?


I don't have kids. A buddy of mine and I each buy one and we split any winnings we get. Winning squares get 20k...if you have the inverse numbers you get your money back and each touching square to yours sees a bit of a piece.

Posted by cccp1014 on 1/30/2018 10:23:00 AM (view original):
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/12/07/rep_jim_jordan_grills_fbi_director_wray_about_peter_strzok.html

Is this not what the released materials will be shedding the light on?

I don't know, that is speculation.

Posted by bad_luck on 1/30/2018 10:24:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 1/30/2018 10:20:00 AM (view original):
$1k!!?!?! You're rich.

I think it is as I laid out. But I could also be completely wrong. Since I don't trust any politician I just want to see the facts for myself. Why are you so against that?

What facts do you think a memo written by Nunes will expose? The guy is clearly running defense for Trump.

What you “laid out” is a fundamental misunderstanding of what’s going on. You pretend to be smart but you’re actually dumb.

He is definitely Trump's left tackle.

Posted by The Taint on 1/30/2018 10:26:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 1/30/2018 10:23:00 AM (view original):
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/12/07/rep_jim_jordan_grills_fbi_director_wray_about_peter_strzok.html

Is this not what the released materials will be shedding the light on?

I don't know, that is speculation.

Well this is what I am curious about. I didn't care all that much until I watched that congressional hearing. Pretty damning.

CCCP, just use logic.

Posted by The Taint on 1/30/2018 10:25:00 AM (view original):
If you don't trust any politician why would you trust a document prepared totally by a politician known for his hyper-partisanship?


I don't have kids. A buddy of mine and I each buy one and we split any winnings we get. Winning squares get 20k...if you have the inverse numbers you get your money back and each touching square to yours sees a bit of a piece.

My friend does one like that too. He and his cousin split their square. $1k each. I think the winner gets $25k?

I am poor :(

Darn kids. LOL

Posted by tangplay on 1/30/2018 10:28:00 AM (view original):
CCCP, just use logic.

I am using the force. What do you have against the force?



I will do as my main man Ben Shapiro does. This is off his site. No offense tangy, but I respect his opinion more than yours or even my own!!

Some Republicans who have read the memo have hinted heavily that it contains information that could unravel the entire Mueller investigation, long described by the president as a “witch hunt.”

The precise contents of the memo remain unknown. However, it’s believed to contain allegations that the FBI did not adequately explain to a clandestine court that some of the information it used in a surveillance warrant application for Trump adviser Carter Page came from opposition research funded by the Clinton campaign, now known as the “Steele dossier.”