I don't think Spectre losing represents a swing to anything. He is the worst kind of politician, one whose views and allegiances change depending on what he thinks he needs to say in order to save his own hide.
If anything I would argue that Spectre losing represents a win for the tea-party crowd since it shows that incumbency, generally considered a huge advantage for politicians, is going to be an anchor for the coming election cycle. "Vote the bums out" seems to be the popular rallying cry these days.
I guess your comment above confuses me more than anything. On one hand you seem to be saying that you believe Spectre losing is indicative of a general shift to the politically (which plays into your conservative victim complex) but it won't be reported that way.
On the other hand, I am sure I can dig up any number of posts wher you talk about how the tea-party demonstrates that the people are trying to take back their government...and that this grass roots movement represents a move to the right politically.
So, I'm not clear on what you think is actually going on. More importantly I'd submit that this just shows that the perceived right/ dichotomy is totally artificial and an inherently flawed way to look at politics.
Just a thought...