The Mad Scientist Top 25 Ranking Debate Topic

zhawks
Posts: 881 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 66 38
Pro
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By lostmyth2 on 12/22/2009

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009

You severely underestimate my intelligence.

Actually, it's more likely he's overestimating your intelligence.

Do you have something to add or not? You pick the most worthless, non-game related sentence of that post and that's all you got....go back to your kids' table...
LOL! You just lost all credibility with this statement. Kids table? If lm2 is on the kids table I don't want to know where any of the rest of us are playing.
12/22/2009 6:26 PM
zhawks
Posts: 881 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 66 38
Pro
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/22/2009

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009

Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/22/2009

Just because something hasn't happened does not mean it can not. So let's see...we have 10 worlds with about 40 seasons per world....if it hasn't happened in 400 total HD seasons (and you haven't proven that it has) what makes you think it can or ever will happen? Do you see what a boob you look like because you don't think past surface miniutae?

And four hundredthly using overalls in that since is completely misleading. That 780 team, they have 100 we/st/dur, while the 690 team has 80 sta and 5 we/dur. seems like now you're the one in the hole. And the extremist is back....if and when it ever happens...come tell daddy....Chances are team compositions aren't going to be even close to that...hell sims don't even recruit that badly.

Small sample size.
370 seasons is a small sample size....LMFAO...that's out and out hilarious.....is everyone else reading this too? Yep...351,500 team seasons is an incredibly small sample size. You look ridiculous...you really might want to stop.
Heed your own advice.
12/22/2009 6:27 PM
vandydave
Posts: 2124 (0)
Hall of Famer
28 1 1 843 273
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/22/2009

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009

I've never coached an HD team in back to back seasons...
So you are a cherry-picker who can't win? Ouch, even diablo can sometimes do that much.



You don't even know when I played, what teams I took over, etc...do some research eh? I'll be honest and tell you that my 6-22 Philly Bib Season in Tark, I didn't recruit or pay attention to at all...just simply wasn't interested. Things aren't as clear cut as you make them seem.
so context matters in addition to team ratings???
12/22/2009 6:27 PM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
Funny how everyone just to stop seeing/remembering who's winning and who's losing here and just gang up in their non-game related hatred for me...classic and fantastic...bring it.
12/22/2009 6:27 PM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/22/2009
LOL! You just lost all credibility with this statement. Kids table? If lm2 is on the kids table I don't want to know where any of the rest of us are playing.
I lost credibility because I said kids table LOFL!!!! This keeps getting better....you're all there playing with him
12/22/2009 6:28 PM
lostmyth2
Posts: 2 (0)
Hall of Famer
191 3 2
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009Funny how everyone just to stop seeing/remembering who's winning and who's losing here and just gang up in their non-game related hatred for me...classic and fantastic...bring it
I don't hate you at all. You have provided pure comedy gold. Do go on.
12/22/2009 6:28 PM
zhawks
Posts: 881 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 66 38
Pro
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/22/2009
Small sample size.
370 seasons is a small sample size....LMFAO...that's out and out hilarious.....is everyone else reading this too? Yep...351,500 team seasons is an incredibly small sample size. You look ridiculous...you really might want to stop
Also 25% + of each team changes every year. If there were 351,500 team seasons all simmed with the exact same player ratings and it had never happened then I might consider giving you that one.

Also (as you have mentioned) who you plays matters very much and therefore, yes it is a very small sample size and also doesn't come close to proving anything.
12/22/2009 6:29 PM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/22/2009Heed your own advice
Dude, you just said 351,500 team seasons was a small sample size...do you understand what you post?
12/22/2009 6:29 PM
zhawks
Posts: 881 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 66 38
Pro
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009Funny how everyone just to stop seeing/remembering who's winning and who's losing here and just gang up in their non-game related hatred for me...classic and fantastic...bring it
We all know who is winning and it isn't you.
12/22/2009 6:30 PM
zhawks
Posts: 881 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 66 38
Pro
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/22/2009
Heed your own advice.
Dude, you just said 351,500 team seasons was a small sample size...do you understand what you post
I do, the question is do you? (and that was retorical question, we all know the answer is no).
12/22/2009 6:30 PM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By vandydave on 12/22/2009so context matters in addition to team ratings??
For a ranking system that only deals with truth, facts, and hard numbers...me or anyone else not paying attention to a team doesn't matter for ranking purposes....its highly subjective and conjecturous to think what the team would have done with me as opposed to what they ACTUALLY DID without me. In my ranking system, if you can't put a concrete number on it, it doesn't matter....like it or not.
12/22/2009 6:31 PM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By lostmyth2 on 12/22/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009
Funny how everyone just to stop seeing/remembering who's winning and who's losing here and just gang up in their non-game related hatred for me...classic and fantastic...bring it.
I don't hate you at all. You have provided pure comedy gold. Do go on
You didn't pipe up in here A. To the relevant discussion and B. Until there were other people posting at the same time as you.....hmmmm....that's odd.
12/22/2009 6:32 PM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/22/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009

Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/22/2009
Small sample size.
370 seasons is a small sample size....LMFAO...that's out and out hilarious.....is everyone else reading this too? Yep...351,500 team seasons is an incredibly small sample size. You look ridiculous...you really might want to stop.
Also 25% + of each team changes every year. If there were 351,500 team seasons all simmed with the exact same player ratings and it had never happened then I might consider giving you that one. 5 seasons is a small sample size....74 times that is not. Say you have 10 690s and 10780s a season...that's 7400 tries and you still can't prove to me that its ever happened...but I guess 7400 team seasons is too small too...right?

Also (as you have mentioned) who you plays matters very much and therefore, yes it is a very small sample size and also doesn't come close to proving anything. You said a 780 can win 0 games and a 690 can lose 0 and you've yet to prove it. You're off the charts on the BS meter....where are your corner men telling you to shut up and stop the fight you're losing ridiculously?

12/22/2009 6:35 PM
lostmyth2
Posts: 2 (0)
Hall of Famer
191 3 2
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009Until there were other people posting at the same time as you.....hmmmm....that's odd
I, as well as others I'm sure, would love to hear what your amazing faculties of deduction have led you to conclude here.
12/22/2009 6:36 PM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By lostmyth2 on 12/22/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009
Until there were other people posting at the same time as you.....hmmmm....that's odd.
I, as well as others I'm sure, would love to hear what your amazing faculties of deduction have led you to conclude here
Feel free to read the last umpteen pages...I'm here and I posted multiple times...if you can't discern what I want to do, you're an idiot...the last 2 pages really paint what I want to do and I even conceded some points...so accept it or not.
12/22/2009 6:38 PM
◂ Prev 1...29|30|31|32|33...75 Next ▸
The Mad Scientist Top 25 Ranking Debate Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.