IN the big south, division one: Conference records by rating

645/590/663 all tied in the east.

a 670 in fourth, beneath all of them.

Followed by a 637 and a 641.

In the other division:

748 in first
A 693 and a 653 tied for second.
a 671 behind both
A 626 next
608 last.

ACC: By ratings, in conference
North:
744 in first
796 in second
674 in third
743 in fourth
741 in fifth
725 in sixth

South:
737
753
752
756
721
745

Big East:
east
770
782
777
775
710
764

West:
793
771
761
723
736
715

Big Ten:
East
710
725
789
755
747
728

West:

795
719
801
735
720
748

Quote: Originally Posted By a_in_the_b on 12/22/2009IN the big south, division one: Conference records by rating

645/590/663 all tied in the east.

a 670 in fourth, beneath all of them.

Followed by a 637 and a 641.

In the other division:

748 in first
A 693 and a 653 tied for second.
a 671 behind both
A 626 next
608 last.

ACC: By ratings, in conference
North:
744 in first
796 in second
674 in third
743 in fourth
741 in fifth
725 in sixth

South:
737
753
752
756
721
745

Big East:
east
770
782
777
775
710
764

West:
793
771
761
723
736
715

Big Ten:
East
710
725
789
755
747
728

West:

795
719
801
735
720
748

I've conceded that the overalls need to be tweaked, and guess who's going to look into methods to do so....hmmmm...yours truly. I'm willing to better what's wrong with the rankings/ratings here....the rest of you just think you can beat me.......lol.........lol........I'm aiming to make the game better...you boobs are spinning wheels.

That is a completed season, only conference standings, so no question of just having radically different schedules. .and your ranking system doesn't even track there.

But COlonels, this isn't a matter of tweaking. .ITS NOT EVEN CLOSE.

Quote: Originally Posted By a_in_the_b on 12/22/2009That is a completed season, only conference standings, so no question of just having radically different schedules. .and your ranking system doesn't even track there.

You don't even know what my rankings would say. I GUARANTEE ALL OF YOU that my rankings would look better than what you think they would...I GUARANTEE it.

At least, at a minimum, one major exception in each of the conferences, if not more, mentioned.

This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.

Quote: Originally Posted By a_in_the_b on 12/22/2009At least, at a minimum, one major exception in each of the conferences, if not more, mentioned.

I'm not saying conference standings should order themselves by overall team ratings...again, another guy that thinks he knows what I'm talking about and how I rank teams....you don't.

This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.

You would use your opponents overall team rating (preferably after some tweaking) as your main component for SOS, that's what I've been trying to say here all along, because after all, the main determinant in who wins and who loses in this thing are players and player ratings, which oddly enough make up teams and team ratings.

And please note that I said MAIN and not ONLY.

If that was the main determinant, then you woudl think it woudl actually seem to have more of a solid correlation with the thing its supposed to determine. . .

Quote: Originally Posted By a_in_the_b on 12/22/2009If that was the main determinant, then you woudl think it woudl actually seem to have more of a solid correlation with the thing its supposed to determine. . .

A. I've admitted that the overalls need work....but I'll still use them raw like this as well.

B. Its the opponents team rating that matters NOT YOUR OWN TEAM's RATING....though I do have another system that will factor both...teams killing weaker schedules will probably be rated lower than teams winning mediocrely against tougher schedules. You guys just don't get how I do rankings, even though I'm basically trying to tell you.

. . . .

Ok. SO the rating is relevant for the team you are playing, but not for you?

O. . .k. . .

YOu are right about one thing, I don't get how you do it, and I suspect I wouldn't even if you gave a step by step, because right on the face of it, not a single one of your defenses of it so far has made an iota of sense.

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009B. Its the opponents team rating that matters NOT YOUR OWN TEAM's RATING...

Instant classic!