Romney/Ryan Topic

Posted by rcrusso on 9/2/2012 4:15:00 PM (view original):
Posted by swamphawk22 on 9/2/2012 3:19:00 PM (view original):
http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/July-2004/The-Mystery-of-Mayor-Daley/

Found this in about 8 seconds
And this proves something? How many times were you dropped on your head as a child? Clearly more then once.
You asked for a direct example and I gave one.

Be careful what you ask for or you will surely get it, and then throw a tantrum for getting it!
9/2/2012 6:53 PM
Posted by swamphawk22 on 9/2/2012 1:54:00 PM (view original):
Posted by jvford on 9/1/2012 10:40:00 PM (view original):
Posted by seamar_116 on 9/1/2012 10:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by jvford on 9/1/2012 9:55:00 PM (view original):
Just me? Nope, it appears to be an issue to lots of people.

And btw, do you actually know what brag means? Because brag and lie don't mean the same thing and you seem to be trying to use them interchangeably. It's bragging when you tell everyone you ran a marathon in under 3 hours AND YOU ACTUALLY DID! If you tell everyone and you didn't, it's lying. Get it?
so jvford, are you suggesting that it would take a real douche to lie in order to brag? That person must have some insecurities. And I don't think you can hide your insecuriteis in the Cayman Islands or a Swiss bank account.
I'm suggesting if someone's willing to lie about something that's verifiable, imagine how much he lies when it's not.
I am suggesting that someone might stretch the truth about personal accomplisments THAT ARE IRELEVANT IN THE LARGER CONTEXT!

You guys are so desperate to cover up for calling him a liar about the plant that you need to invent stuff.

Do you have a tape of him telling a sweet old lady at Church that he loves her hat when he really thinks its ugly?
So who's feelings was he trying to spare by lying about his marathon time?
9/2/2012 7:13 PM
Posted by swamphawk22 on 9/2/2012 6:53:00 PM (view original):
Posted by rcrusso on 9/2/2012 4:15:00 PM (view original):
Posted by swamphawk22 on 9/2/2012 3:19:00 PM (view original):
http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/July-2004/The-Mystery-of-Mayor-Daley/

Found this in about 8 seconds
And this proves something? How many times were you dropped on your head as a child? Clearly more then once.
You asked for a direct example and I gave one.

Be careful what you ask for or you will surely get it, and then throw a tantrum for getting it!
I guess living in a cesspool like Detroit is better then living in a REAL city. You poor fat load of ****!
9/2/2012 7:49 PM
Posted by swamphawk22 on 9/2/2012 6:53:00 PM (view original):
Posted by rcrusso on 9/2/2012 4:15:00 PM (view original):
Posted by swamphawk22 on 9/2/2012 3:19:00 PM (view original):
http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/July-2004/The-Mystery-of-Mayor-Daley/

Found this in about 8 seconds
And this proves something? How many times were you dropped on your head as a child? Clearly more then once.
You asked for a direct example and I gave one.

Be careful what you ask for or you will surely get it, and then throw a tantrum for getting it!
Please let a meteor land on swamp's head.
9/2/2012 8:11 PM
Posted by rcrusso on 9/2/2012 7:49:00 PM (view original):
Posted by swamphawk22 on 9/2/2012 6:53:00 PM (view original):
Posted by rcrusso on 9/2/2012 4:15:00 PM (view original):
Posted by swamphawk22 on 9/2/2012 3:19:00 PM (view original):
http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/July-2004/The-Mystery-of-Mayor-Daley/

Found this in about 8 seconds
And this proves something? How many times were you dropped on your head as a child? Clearly more then once.
You asked for a direct example and I gave one.

Be careful what you ask for or you will surely get it, and then throw a tantrum for getting it!
I guess living in a cesspool like Detroit is better then living in a REAL city. You poor fat load of ****!
So I show evidence of corruption, and your response is to attack Detroit? 

How Chicago style!
9/2/2012 8:41 PM
That is evidence of massive corruption? And why can you attach my city but yours is to be considered immune? What an ******* you are.
9/2/2012 9:03 PM
Posted by rcrusso on 9/2/2012 9:03:00 PM (view original):
That is evidence of massive corruption? And why can you attach my city but yours is to be considered immune? What an ******* you are.
Who said massive. You asked for any evidence and I provided it.

Lighten up
9/2/2012 9:06 PM
Lyin' Ryan at it again.

"O’DONNELL: Now you’re criticizing the President for those same defense cuts you’re voting for and called a victory.

RYAN: No, no — I have to correct on you this, Norah. I voted for a mechanism that says the sequester will occur if we don’t cut $1.2 trillion in government. … We can get into this nomenclature [babble]

O’DONNELL: Right. A trillion dollars in defense spending, and you voted for it!

RYAN: No, Norah. I voted for the Budget Control Act.

O’DONNELL: That included defense spending!

RYAN: Norah, you’re mistaken.

O’Donnell is, in fact, not mistaken. The Budget Control Act, as passed, included both the roughly $600 billion in “sequestration” cuts that will happen if there’s no compromise on the budget by December as well as the $487 billion of military-supported cuts that will take place regardless. The fact that Ryan may have wished that the bill didn’t contain said defense cuts does not absolve him of the fact that he and 201 other Republicans voted for the bill as-passed.
9/10/2012 10:32 PM

Years before becoming famous as an advocate of fiscal restraint, Paul Ryan supported a now-controversial Energy Department loan program aimed at developing greener cars — and even called for DOE to hand out lump-sum payments to companies.

The department’s Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing loan program doesn’t make lump-sum payments, instead doling out the money incrementally to ensure that recipients meet financial and performance milestones along the way. Energy Department officials have stressed in recent months that the tactic is a key part of their due diligence process, aimed at monitoring loan recipients’ financial stability.

But Ryan called for a different strategy in an October 2008 letter to then-Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman outlining a series of steps the department should take as it finalized the ATVM loan program. The letter, obtained by POLITICO, calls for “disbursement flexibility” aimed at “ensuring access to the approved lump-sum versus incremental access.”

Ryan campaign spokesman Brendan Buck said Monday that the Wisconsin Republican wasn’t trying to water down the program’s safeguards.

“Nothing in the letter suggests reduced or revised thresholds for qualifying funds,” Buck said by email. “The flexibility related solely to funding after a company had been approved as a viable recipient.”

Buck also defended Ryan’s support for the loan program, which has become a target for some Republicans following the travails of loan recipient Fisker Automotive.

“Congressman Ryan believed redirecting these pre-existing funds to aid the American auto industry was a better solution than what the White House ultimately did — use TARP to pick winners and losers,” Buck added.

The 2008 letter laid out a number of other factors the Energy Department should consider when approving ATVM loans. They include prioritizing projects that have ceased production or closed down. The letter also was signed by three Wisconsin Democrats: Sen. Herb Kohl, then-Sen. Russ Feingold and Rep. Tammy Baldwin.

Republicans have taken aim at the ATVM loan program as part of broader attacks on the administration’s clean-energy investments. Ryan has specifically criticized the Energy Department for issuing a $529 million loan in April 2010 to Fisker under the ATVM program.

“I would just say, if you take a look at the president’s policies, he calls them investments. It’s borrowing money and spending money through Washington, picking winners and losers, spending money on favorite people like Solyndra or Fisker,” Ryan said on CBS’s “This Morning” earlier this month. “Picking winners and losers in the economy through spending, through tax breaks, through regulations does not work.”

Republicans allege Fisker used the loan money to produce its high-end Karma electric vehicle in Finland, and hence Obama is creating jobs overseas. But both DOE and the company have said the loan money was used in the United States for design and parts manufacturing.

Ryan admitted last month that his office sent letters supporting requests for stimulus money for energy projects in his district even though he is a leading critic of the stimulus law. He wrote to the Energy Department in 2009 seeking stimulus money for two Wisconsin energy conservation companies.

Ryan initially denied having made the 2009 requests, then acknowledged it.

“After having these letters called to my attention, I checked into them, and they were treated as constituent service requests in the same way matters involving Social Security or Veterans Affairs are handled,” Ryan said in a statement last month. “This is why I didn’t recall the letters earlier. But they should have been handled differently, and I take responsibility for that


9/11/2012 3:09 AM
Allegedly Ryan is still running for his house seat in Wisconsin?  If thats true it's pretty telling.
9/11/2012 3:15 AM
Not exactly "all in" is it?
9/11/2012 3:39 AM
Posted by The Taint on 9/11/2012 3:15:00 AM (view original):
Allegedly Ryan is still running for his house seat in Wisconsin?  If thats true it's pretty telling.
wasnt he already set to run when he was picked?

Run and win and then I belive the Republican Governor gets to pick replacement.
9/11/2012 8:54 PM
Wrong again batman.
9/11/2012 9:02 PM
Posted by stinenavy on 9/10/2012 10:32:00 PM (view original):
Lyin' Ryan at it again.

"O’DONNELL: Now you’re criticizing the President for those same defense cuts you’re voting for and called a victory.

RYAN: No, no — I have to correct on you this, Norah. I voted for a mechanism that says the sequester will occur if we don’t cut $1.2 trillion in government. … We can get into this nomenclature [babble]

O’DONNELL: Right. A trillion dollars in defense spending, and you voted for it!

RYAN: No, Norah. I voted for the Budget Control Act.

O’DONNELL: That included defense spending!

RYAN: Norah, you’re mistaken.

O’Donnell is, in fact, not mistaken. The Budget Control Act, as passed, included both the roughly $600 billion in “sequestration” cuts that will happen if there’s no compromise on the budget by December as well as the $487 billion of military-supported cuts that will take place regardless. The fact that Ryan may have wished that the bill didn’t contain said defense cuts does not absolve him of the fact that he and 201 other Republicans voted for the bill as-passed.
Right.

If the Congress had did their job their would be no defense cuts.

The Democrats refused to cut and instead wanted more tax increases.

So Ryan assume that congress could be adults and he was wrong!
9/11/2012 9:06 PM
If the congress had did their job their would be no defense cuts.

All of your former teachers should be fired.
9/11/2012 9:08 PM
◂ Prev 1...31|32|33|34|35...44 Next ▸
Romney/Ryan Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.