https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/13/opinions/strzok-hearing-bias-opinion-callan/index.html


SOURCE!

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:25:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:21:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.

Well, clearly, Strzok’s actions prove you right. It was crazy how, right before the election, he leaked info to the press that the Trump campaign was under investigation. Wait, nope, didn’t do that.

But it was crazy how he argued that the FBI shouldn’t announce the update on the Clinton investigation in order to help Clinton. Oh wait, nope, he was in favor of the announcement.

Well, at least he’s guilty of trying to make sure no charges were filled against Clinton. Dammit! Turns out he was in favor of charging her. Jeez, this guy sucks at his deep state secret Trump sabatoge job.




Seriously, though. FBI agents are allowed to have opinions on politics. They just can’t let those opinions impact their work. And, judging by the evidence, Strzok didn’t allow that to happen.

Exactly. Who did PS damage greater?

Hillary or DJT?

Himself and the Bureau

None of that came out until later.


Proof is in the pudding.


the FBI damaged HRC. Not DJT

This 100%

Nope. HRC damaged HRC. Not DJT and not Russia. But you're close. I ll slowly lead you to the truth.

Lol. Who's opinion piece is that?

dershowitz?

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:23:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:20:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.

Well, clearly, Strzok’s actions prove you right. It was crazy how, right before the election, he leaked info to the press that the Trump campaign was under investigation. Wait, nope, didn’t do that.

But it was crazy how he argued that the FBI shouldn’t announce the update on the Clinton investigation in order to help Clinton. Oh wait, nope, he was in favor of the announcement.

Well, at least he’s guilty of trying to make sure no charges were filled against Clinton. Dammit! Turns out he was in favor of charging her. Jeez, this guy sucks at his deep state secret Trump sabatoge job.




Seriously, though. FBI agents are allowed to have opinions on politics. They just can’t let those opinions impact their work. And, judging by the evidence, Strzok didn’t allow that to happen.

He never thought Trump would win. I am OK with him having bias but don't lie and say you didn't. He said he didn't. LOL. He seemed to close the HRC investigation fairly rapidly though. Ha ha ha. That man is one conniving dude. That's fine just say as much.

"I hated Trump. I thought he would be an awful candidate and I am shocked he won. Still I did my job and did not have any bias toward the Clinton or Trump investigations"...seems simple enough.

If he was doing his job and he was not biased then why did Mueller drop him?

He said he didn’t let his personal opinions impact his work.

Lied again. LMAO.

But, of course, we now know the opinion of one agent, and he happens to be the one who substituted "extremely careless" for "gross negligence," a usage that might have suggested to some that Clinton had violated US laws in her handling of classified email materials. That agent, Strzok, despised Trump.

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:29:00 PM (view original):
Lol. Who's opinion piece is that?

dershowitz?

Some guy Paul Callan? Never heard of him.


Paul Callan, a CNN legal analyst, is a former New York homicide prosecutor and media law professor.


Paul Callan is a CNN legal analyst, a former New York homicide prosecutor and current counsel at the New York law firm of Edelman & Edelman PC, focusing on wrongful conviction and civil rights cases.


Likely not a Trump guy?

Does this mean I get to reference all of Callan's OP's as fact? Cause theres a lot of them that arent going to make you very happy.

or are you just gong to cherry pick?

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:37:00 PM (view original):
Does this mean I get to reference all of Callan's OP's as fact? Cause theres a lot of them that arent going to make you very happy.

or are you just gong to cherry pick?

I just sited the article. Not sure what you mean?

My point was that Petey was biased and that impacted his decisions and I also showed that he could not expose that Trump may be investigated because it would have cost him his job and maybe freedom.

Unlike bad luck you seem normal. So will you agree that you have your bias and I have mine and it is highly unlikely either of us will change our respective minds. Fair?

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:11:00 PM (view original):
So whens Trump going to testify under oath?

thats right he wont.

his team knows he is incapable of not lying, even under oath.

Was Hillary under oath?

I surely have bias and deal with it at work always.

i actually just went out of my way to help an account that i despise. Very much out of my way. Im a professional.

would you purposely **** an account that you dont like in your business dealings?

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:21:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.

Well, clearly, Strzok’s actions prove you right. It was crazy how, right before the election, he leaked info to the press that the Trump campaign was under investigation. Wait, nope, didn’t do that.

But it was crazy how he argued that the FBI shouldn’t announce the update on the Clinton investigation in order to help Clinton. Oh wait, nope, he was in favor of the announcement.

Well, at least he’s guilty of trying to make sure no charges were filled against Clinton. Dammit! Turns out he was in favor of charging her. Jeez, this guy sucks at his deep state secret Trump sabatoge job.




Seriously, though. FBI agents are allowed to have opinions on politics. They just can’t let those opinions impact their work. And, judging by the evidence, Strzok didn’t allow that to happen.

Exactly. Who did PS damage greater?

Hillary or DJT?

Himself and the Bureau

None of that came out until later.


Proof is in the pudding.


the FBI damaged HRC. Not DJT

The FBI HEADS in critical positions tried to COVER FOR HRC so it didn't get to BHO.

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:42:00 PM (view original):
I surely have bias and deal with it at work always.

i actually just went out of my way to help an account that i despise. Very much out of my way. Im a professional.

would you purposely **** an account that you dont like in your business dealings?

NEVER! But I would also never cheat on my wife. My moral compass is not the same as Petey's. I know its neither here nor there but I didn't like Petey's smug look of defiance either. I thought he was a bit too arrogant. Then again he is getting the purple heart.

Heck I'd even help bad luck if he was on the side of the road. Begrudgingly.

I am not the only one!

“I found Lisa Page to be more credible than Peter Strzok,” Rep.Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) said as he left the House hearing.

“I didn’t agree with her characterization of every text message and every piece of evidence, but we did not see the smug attitude from Lisa Page that we saw from Peter Strzok.”

Hahaha

you talk moral compass then mention Matt Gaetz? Lulz. You really dont know much about US politics do you?

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.

Well, clearly, Strzok’s actions prove you right. It was crazy how, right before the election, he leaked info to the press that the Trump campaign was under investigation. Wait, nope, didn’t do that.

But it was crazy how he argued that the FBI shouldn’t announce the update on the Clinton investigation in order to help Clinton. Oh wait, nope, he was in favor of the announcement.

Well, at least he’s guilty of trying to make sure no charges were filled against Clinton. Dammit! Turns out he was in favor of charging her. Jeez, this guy sucks at his deep state secret Trump sabatoge job.




Seriously, though. FBI agents are allowed to have opinions on politics. They just can’t let those opinions impact their work. And, judging by the evidence, Strzok didn’t allow that to happen.

He didn't have to leak info. The fix was in. Hillary was downgraded to a misdemeanor BY STRZOK who wrote the exoneration before the investigation that never happened. It's CYA time in Obamaville.

The rest of it is BS unless you can prove it. Repeating lies you wish were true is hardly fact.

The House investigation has already shown Strzok rewrote the Comey statement on Hillary BEFORE her sham investigation. The one where she was surrounded by her lawyers and insider guilty people who worked and lied for her. GIVEN IMMUNITY!!!!! The one and ONLY one. And she wasn't under oath.

Everything I've seen in the last several pages proposed by liberal sycophants is nothing but lies and half-truths. A lot of BS getting thrown around here today.

You might wanna back up and document a few things.

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:59:00 PM (view original):
Hahaha

you talk moral compass then mention Matt Gaetz? Lulz. You really dont know much about US politics do you?

Admittedly not as much as I should. I in life many a time follow the naked eye test or first impression test and go from there. Rightly or wrongly. My naked eye test of Petey was not favorable.