TRUMP: Best President Ever (New and Improved!) Topic

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 10:16:00 PM (view original):
There’s no way she wins the popular vote by 5 points and loses the electoral. The margins in MI/WI/PA were tiny.
Blue wall cracking. I was cracking up watching it unfold and the snowflakes cry.
7/16/2018 11:00 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 11:00:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 10:16:00 PM (view original):
There’s no way she wins the popular vote by 5 points and loses the electoral. The margins in MI/WI/PA were tiny.
Blue wall cracking. I was cracking up watching it unfold and the snowflakes cry.
If she got 70% of California, New York and Illinois, yeah, she could.
7/16/2018 11:06 PM
Indeed. My vote here in MA didn’t count either. So I voted for Tom Brady. Go Pats.

7/16/2018 11:09 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 10:52:00 PM (view original):
Posted by gomiami1972 on 7/16/2018 10:26:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 10:24:00 PM (view original):
That’s not really the case. The polls were a measurement in time. They weren’t suggesting anything more than what they are, a snapshot.
OK, I'll concede that. Sometimes you can be quite logical. Even a blind squirrel...
No one polled me? I wonder sometimes how these polls get their data.
They only poll 1000-3000 landlines. How many millions of households are there?

Why do you pretend it’s some sort of conspiracy?
7/16/2018 11:11 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 10:51:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 10:24:00 PM (view original):
That’s not really the case. The polls were a measurement in time. They weren’t suggesting anything more than what they are, a snapshot.
A snapshot of inaccuracy lmao
Did you miss the part where BL said (correctly) that the polls were correct?

7/16/2018 11:54 PM
Also I love when CCCP gets so backed into a corner with his arguments that he just resorts to ad hominem and drops it. Then, a couple pages later he says he won the argument and repeats the same stuff that he already lost on. Good times.
7/16/2018 11:55 PM
I love when Tang posts everything twice. Really driving that point home.
7/17/2018 12:00 AM
I don't know why WIS does that.
7/17/2018 1:02 AM
Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 7:46:00 PM (view original):

A Russian gun-rights activist who developed close relations with leaders of the National Rifle Association as well as conservative activists working with Donald Trump’s presidential campaign was arraigned Monday on charges she conspired to influence American politics on behalf of the Russian government.

Maria Butina, 29, who founded the Russian gun group “The Right to Bear Arms” and worked as the executive assistant to a top official of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, was arrested Sunday by the FBI in Washington, D.C. The charges allege that she visited the United States in 2015 and 2016 for the purposes of acting “as an agent” of the Russia, according to a criminal complaint released by the U.S. Justice Department on Monday afternoon, a few hours after President Trump and Russian President Putin met in Helsinki. Butina conspired to “exploit personal connections” with U.S. political figures and to “infiltrate organizations active in U.S. politics” and establish “back channel lines of communication” in an effort to advance Russian government interests, the complaint charges.

Chief among the groups Butina and her boss, Russian central banker Alexander Torshin, sought to infiltrate was the NRA. Torshin became a lifetime member of the group, and he and Butina regularly attended the association’s annual meetings, held private dinners with the group’s leaders and joined them for target shooting.

A March 2015 email to an unnamed conservative activist that was discovered on a search of Butina’s laptop outlined a project to alter the Republican Party’s traditional hostility to Russia by exploiting ties to the NRA, which she described as “the largest sponsor of the elections to the U.S. Congress,” according to an FBI affidavit in support of her arrest. She also wrote that Republicans “would likely obtain control over the U.S. government after the 2016 elections.” (In the complaint, the Republicans are described only as “Political Party 1” and the NRA as a “Gun Rights Organization.” The NRA did not immediately respond to requests for comment.)

Butina’s arrest is significant in light of her apparent efforts to penetrate the Trump campaign and to get the GOP candidate to commit to lifting sanctions on Russia at a time relations with Moscow were hardly a front-burner issue in the presidential race. In July 2015, just weeks after Trump announced his candidacy, Butina showed up at a conservative evangelical Christian event in Las Vegas, where she questioned the new candidate about his position on sanctions against Russia. “Do you want to continue the politics of sanctions that are damaging both economies?” Butina asked Trump after he called on her in a question and answer session. Trump replied in the course of a rambling five-minute answer: “I know Putin. … I believe I would get along very nicely with Putin, OK? I don’t think you’d need the sanctions.”

As revealed in the book Russian Roulette, co-authored by this reporter with David Corn, Trump adviser Steven Bannon and Republican National Committee chair Reince Priebus shared concerns about Butina and her agenda after viewing video of her questioning Trump.

“How was it that this Russian woman happened to be in Las Vegas for that event?” Bannon and Priebus discussed among themselves, according to “Russian Roulette.” “And how was it that Trump happened to call on her? And Trump’s response? It was odd, Bannon thought, that Trump had a fully developed answer. Priebus agreed there was something strange about Butina. Whenever there were events held by conservative groups, she was always around, he told Bannon.”

House intelligence commitee we talked about today, refused to interview Butina during their investigation into collusion even though the democrats were demanding it.


weird
7/17/2018 1:31 AM
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 11:11:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 10:52:00 PM (view original):
Posted by gomiami1972 on 7/16/2018 10:26:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 10:24:00 PM (view original):
That’s not really the case. The polls were a measurement in time. They weren’t suggesting anything more than what they are, a snapshot.
OK, I'll concede that. Sometimes you can be quite logical. Even a blind squirrel...
No one polled me? I wonder sometimes how these polls get their data.
They only poll 1000-3000 landlines. How many millions of households are there?

Why do you pretend it’s some sort of conspiracy?
Why are you jumping to conclusions? I just asked why they never poll me. Sheeesh.

7/17/2018 9:19 AM
Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 11:55:00 PM (view original):
Also I love when CCCP gets so backed into a corner with his arguments that he just resorts to ad hominem and drops it. Then, a couple pages later he says he won the argument and repeats the same stuff that he already lost on. Good times.
You love it? Give me an example of that happening since you love it so much. This is rich coming from a person who said the US and Russia were not allies in WWII and then went back and forth on the whole person with male parts in a women's locker room. As I said, my 14 year old is smarter and better spoken than you.
7/17/2018 9:20 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1409sXBleg

Cold War is over
7/17/2018 9:33 AM
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:19:00 AM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 11:11:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 10:52:00 PM (view original):
Posted by gomiami1972 on 7/16/2018 10:26:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 10:24:00 PM (view original):
That’s not really the case. The polls were a measurement in time. They weren’t suggesting anything more than what they are, a snapshot.
OK, I'll concede that. Sometimes you can be quite logical. Even a blind squirrel...
No one polled me? I wonder sometimes how these polls get their data.
They only poll 1000-3000 landlines. How many millions of households are there?

Why do you pretend it’s some sort of conspiracy?
Why are you jumping to conclusions? I just asked why they never poll me. Sheeesh.

You were implying that the data isn't real.
7/17/2018 11:19 AM
Posted by bad_luck on 7/17/2018 11:19:00 AM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:19:00 AM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 11:11:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 10:52:00 PM (view original):
Posted by gomiami1972 on 7/16/2018 10:26:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 10:24:00 PM (view original):
That’s not really the case. The polls were a measurement in time. They weren’t suggesting anything more than what they are, a snapshot.
OK, I'll concede that. Sometimes you can be quite logical. Even a blind squirrel...
No one polled me? I wonder sometimes how these polls get their data.
They only poll 1000-3000 landlines. How many millions of households are there?

Why do you pretend it’s some sort of conspiracy?
Why are you jumping to conclusions? I just asked why they never poll me. Sheeesh.

You were implying that the data isn't real.
Not at all. I was just curious how they decide who to poll.
7/17/2018 11:44 AM
Whatever dude, play dumb.
7/17/2018 12:09 PM
◂ Prev 1...392|393|394|395|396...960 Next ▸
TRUMP: Best President Ever (New and Improved!) Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.