We should make the trading of picks clearer before too many deals happen. As I understand the trading rules:
1) All deals must involve an equal number of players (1 for 1, 2 for 2, ect.). A draft pick counts as one player, so you could deal two players for one draft pick and one player.
2) Draft picks always maintain their year. A pick from 1908 remains a 1908 pick if it changes owners. That means you cannot trade into a higher slot in the draft while still selecting a player from the year of your own franchise.
We need to make a ruling, right now, on whether rule #2 holds true. Here is my logic supporting rule #2. If we were allowed to switch draft pick position and maintain our own club's draft year, then the value of each slot in the draft varies greatly. For example, imagine this draft scenario:
1) 1955 Yankees
2) 1907 Tigers
3) 1994 Red Sox
4) 1911 White Sox
The White Sox owner here would be wise to ask for a trade with the Yankees club, giving them an earlier pick than the chronological rival Tigers club. The Yankees lose absolutely nothing trading down from 1st to 4th in the draft, so from their perspective they receive something for nothing. That draft slot has greatly different value to each club.
If instead draft picks ALWAYS maintain their year, then the value of a draft remains the same and we don't have trades where an owner can acquire something for nothing.