Quote: Originally Posted By mmt0315 on 10/15/2009After seeing whats gone on in Phelan the last several recruiting cycles...I'd turn CC off from the start of recruiting until the end...While I get its no "collusion" to post things in public...There is no place for a coach in one conference to go into another in the middle of recruiting and direct the other conference teams to recruit against one coach...there is also no room for one coach telling another their recruiting strategy...Turning off the CC would prevent these things

Quote: Originally Posted By theeyetest on 10/15/2009Decrease the recruiting dollars generated by post-season play in DI.

Quote: Originally Posted By Fregoe on 10/15/2009maybe have a school specific amount paid out as well as conf specific amount paid out

Quote: Originally Posted By mmt0315 on 10/15/2009After seeing whats gone on in Phelan the last several recruiting cycles...I'd turn CC off from the start of recruiting until the end...While I get its no "collusion" to post things in public...There is no place for a coach in one conference to go into another in the middle of recruiting and direct the other conference teams to recruit against one coach...there is also no room for one coach telling another their recruiting strategy...Turning off the CC would prevent these things

Quote: Originally Posted By Fregoe on 10/15/2009

Quote: Originally Posted By mmt0315 on 10/15/2009
After seeing whats gone on in Phelan the last several recruiting cycles...I'd turn CC off from the start of recruiting until the end...While I get its no "collusion" to post things in public...There is no place for a coach in one conference to go into another in the middle of recruiting and direct the other conference teams to recruit against one coach...there is also no room for one coach telling another their recruiting strategy...Turning off the CC would prevent these things.

I agree 1000000000% Coaches need to stay out of other cc and stop being so goddamn annoying. talk during recruiting might not be against the rules but that doesnt make it ok. too man yguys try to put their noses where they dont belong.

Quote: Originally posted by kkyutzy on 10/15/20091)  RECRUITING:  Only allow you to recruit within you division and have drop downs only happen on the last day of recruiting.  This would reflect true recruiting where players hold out hoping to get a higher division team.  No more pull downs.  You would only be able to see the recruits that are in your division (I, II, III) and only pay for FSS based on the number of recruits within your division.  No sense in a DIII school paying to see potential of DI players.  Make all divisions recruiting similiar to DI, lower prestige schools get a backup message but may be able to recruit the player with a little effort of later into recruiting.  No matter what your prstige is you can see all the possible recruits instead of A+ schools having a list and C- seeing a different list of recruits.2)  PRACTICE PLAN:  Make the practice plan actually mean more instead of the players potential dictating how the player improves.3)  BRING BACK FREEHD:  I would rather see humans coaching DIII schools instead of so many SIMAI.  Wouldn't think it costs more to simulate games with humans playing for free as it does to simulate with SIMAI.  Plus it has the possibility of generating new business if you can get people interested by playing the first season at no charge. Sorry, you only asked for 1.

Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 10/15/2009

Quote: Originally Posted By srunstro on 10/15/2009

Quote: Originally posted by jlhens1 on 10/15/2009

2) I agree with cburton. I would like a setting to sub out a player based not only on fatigue but performance as well. Perhaps have a setting that allows you to chose a fg% at which he will be benched. Obviously this would have to happen after a certain number of shots, because you wouldn't want him to get pulled too soon. If, for example, you had fg% set at 33 and he goes 1-3, that would be too soon to bench him. It could be after maybe 8-10 attempts or something in that range.[

This makes very little sense to me. Unlike real life, in the SIM, a guy who has gone 0-15 has exactly the same chance to hit his 16th shot as a guy who has gone 15-15. Real life players can be streaky. In the SIM, it's all RNG.

People have convinced themselves that players can go streaky and that players have personalities

Quote: Originally Posted By srunstro on 10/15/2009

Quote: Originally posted by jlhens1 on 10/15/2009
2) I agree with cburton. I would like a setting to sub out a player based not only on fatigue but performance as well. Perhaps have a setting that allows you to chose a fg% at which he will be benched. Obviously this would have to happen after a certain number of shots, because you wouldn't want him to get pulled too soon. If, for example, you had fg% set at 33 and he goes 1-3, that would be too soon to bench him. It could be after maybe 8-10 attempts or something in that range.[

This makes very little sense to me. Unlike real life, in the SIM, a guy who has gone 0-15 has exactly the same chance to hit his 16th shot as a guy who has gone 15-15. Real life players can be streaky. In the SIM, it's all RNG.

Quote: Originally Posted By gw795 on 10/15/2009More uncertainty in recruiting. It seems as if we know too much about prospects and how good they are/will be. Maybe ratings should be hidden and only accessible via scouting trips. I don't think everyone will want that to happen though.

I agree that not every player should develop at the same time. There should be some guys that reach their potential early on in college and others who hit it in senior year. Some guys never hit their fullest potential by the end of senior year.