SUPER PROGRESSIVE RE-BOOT is Full Topic

tsballgame
Posts: 0 (0)
Pro
12 1
Prospect
Quote: Originally posted by shysters3 on 10/29/2009With 16 we won't need parity adjustment, but I'm OK with it if we have 20 or 24.

Good point. If we end up with 16 we'll see if this is still an issue.

10/29/2009 9:48 PM
tsballgame
Posts: 0 (0)
Pro
12 1
Prospect
Quote: Originally posted by tsballgame on 10/29/2009I should also say that waitlist owners are welcome.

If, for example, we get 17 returning owners, or 21, then we will want to recruit for whatever we need to get to 20 or 24.

The available player lists are posted, and this is going to be a great league, so anyone who wasn't in on the original Super Progressive wants to get in, let us know and you'll be the first in line if/when we need more owners.


10/29/2009 9:49 PM
tsballgame
Posts: 0 (0)
Pro
12 1
Prospect
big jc is out. Olympic Stadium is now open.

10/29/2009 10:25 PM
homiealiens
Posts: 1753 (0)
Hall of Famer
297 6
Prospect
How many sure ''outs" are there?
10/29/2009 10:51 PM
dannino
Posts: 3737 (0)
Hall of Famer
390 2 2 2 2 3
Rookie
I'm still in, and I'll keep Shea.

I'm okay with the parity idea, if we do 24 teams.

And I liked my three picks. Berra would have anchored my catching for years. Brooks Robinson would have been my 3B pretty much forever. And Three Finger would have been my staff ace. By the way, thanks for the proxy, tsballgame.

I'm okay with the new years, and I like the logic you used to figure it out. Especially with the 1940's players. I really couldn't have seen having IR lists of five or six guys.

By the way, I think with 16 teams, we'd have incredible talent on each team. But I'd be happy with 20 or 24 teams too.

10/29/2009 10:54 PM
masterdebate
Posts: 4504 (1)
Hall of Famer
280 143 1 1
Rookie
sorry, was playing warhammer fantasy all evening (thank you thank you, i'm honored to win the uber dork of the year award)

i'm in. rfk seems like a good choice still, unless camden is available?

the parity idea is great, btw.
10/30/2009 12:44 AM
rizitos
Posts: 1212 (0)
Hall of Famer
898 67 50 139 153 124 65
Prospect
Still in Wrigley field
10/30/2009 1:42 AM
auggieward
Posts: 299 (0)
Hall of Famer
415 1 217
Prospect
Im still in with Tiger Stadium.
10/30/2009 2:02 AM
cubieblu
Posts: 55 (0)
All Star
32 1
Prospect
I like the parity idea if we have 20 or more teams.
10/30/2009 2:10 AM
auggieward
Posts: 299 (0)
Hall of Famer
415 1 217
Prospect
Can the wild card players be from the same season?
10/30/2009 2:17 AM
harrelson
Posts: 3154 (0)
Hall of Famer
680 1
Pro
We should shoot for 24 teams (or at least 20) as we don't want to have all-star teams up and down the line.
10/30/2009 6:07 AM
stan74
Posts: 1036 (0)
Hall of Famer
251 1 1 2 2
Prospect
Sorry guys, I think I'll need to bow out too. Good luck!
10/30/2009 10:39 AM
tsballgame
Posts: 0 (0)
Pro
12 1
Prospect
Quote: Originally posted by masterdebate on 10/30/2009 i'm in. rfk seems like a good choice still, unless camden is available? the parity idea is great, btw.

Camden is still available. I've got you down for RFK, but let me know if you would like to switch.

10/30/2009 11:07 AM
tsballgame
Posts: 0 (0)
Pro
12 1
Prospect
MMTDad sitemailed me to confirm he's in. That give us 18 returnees right now.

I've gotten confirmation from stan74, cheno5, ljmed, and bigjc that they will not be joining us.

Still need to hear one way or the other from bluecrew65. I'll send him a sitemail now to try and get an answer, but will also begin recruiting for the last two spots to bring us up to 20 teams.

10/30/2009 11:32 AM
mikemiele
Posts: 430 (0)
Hall of Famer
161 81
Prospect
ts...

We all appreciate your efforts, your quick answers, and frequent updates.

Keep up the great work!
10/30/2009 12:18 PM
◂ Prev 123456 Next ▸
SUPER PROGRESSIVE RE-BOOT is Full Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.