I'm actually starting to feel like I hit the Joe lottery compared to everyone else. All of mine have at least some redeeming qualities. Richard Jefferson is pretty much a king among Joes; 49% FG, 52% efg, 16% dreb, 13% ast, shoots over 80% from the line and takes over 500 ft, and only 2.2 TO and 2.5 fouls in 39 minutes! Plus he can basically defend the 2/3/4, with a defense around 60. Thanks to whoever put him in the Joe pool.
As to the others: Bradley is a foul machine, but he also blocks a ton of shots, rebounds pretty well, has a def over 90, and doesn't play too many minutes (giving me more room to operate). And his offense isn't great, but with my other scorers I don't need it (plus he shoots 48% and barely turns it over). Danny Ferry is a terrible defender and terrible rebounder at the 4 (where I'll have to play him a lot, unfortunately) but he chips in 140 3s with an efg% over 53% and doesn't turn it over or foul too much. Larry Jones is a big-time scorer, and he's not horribly inefficient; 46.5% FG from a 60s player won't kill me, and I think he'll approach 50% in an uptempo offense. He won't get near his IRL 800 fta and 2200 points, but that's OK. Defense is also pretty crappy at 43, but not a death sentence. Little bit of rebounding, little bit of assists. The most turnovers and fouls of any of my Joes, but that's more a commentary on how decent my Joes are overall - how many of you would be happy if none of your Joes turned it over more than 2.9 times or committed more than 3.6 fouls in 40 minutes?
So overall, my Joes are a little short on rebounding, assists, defense, and 3s, but I think I can take care of that with my other choices. Thanks to pretty solid Joes, I'd be surprised if I don't have a very good team (and I'll only have myself to blame if not!)