Quote: Originally Posted By diablo11 on 4/16/2010
First, it was just the first point of measure in a battle of intellect that came to mind. Of course it's arbitary. There are plenty of places we could start, but I chose that one first. There were many other factors I was planning on going next, but since we never received a response from you, I believe you were the one ducking. Course, it's pretty tough to beat Penn and Wharton so it was a response I expected.

Second, I have no idea how you do with the ladies or what marriage has to do with intelligence. This is the second time you brought this up when the conversation has been intelligence.

I'm not really sure where you want me to go with this. You challenged me, I threw out the first measurement, and you backed down immediately. Then, you have the audacity to call yourself a "big boy"? Explain exactly what YOU brought to the table because I brought an Ivy League degree......

1) There is no way in hell you went to Penn or Wharton...lets please stop kidding ourselves...

2) I never challenged you; I made an A$$ of you and your retort, comeback, crux of argument was well, where did you go to school...

3) My point was which again you miss (which again proves your arent nearly as intelligent as you claim) is that where you went to school is no more a measure of your intelligence than how often you get laid, whether your'e married etc...Also, as TD so well put, where you went to school means NOTHING at the end of the day, not from an intelligence perspective and not from a what you've done with your life perspective;

4) As I have been consistent from the start of this "conversation" I will remain so; how about you answer some of the questions asked of you as they pertain to HD and show you are capable of handling a basic conversation/discussion on these matters and then MAYBE I'd consider divulging anything personal about myself to you as I have with many other users in HD.


4/16/2010 3:53 PM
Penn and Wharton....impressive. Mom and dad must have big bucks to buy your way in there.
4/16/2010 3:57 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By diablo11 on 4/16/2010mlatsko.....why do you keep ignoring my request of how a legend like yourself could possibly have the only losing seasons (not following a sim) in the history of UNC? And you can't use 1954 like your lame PSU excuse because UNC won last yr.
So now that youve been called out on your inability to count; this is where you've taken this? Essentially, Mlat - Seeing that only one other human coach who hasn't followed a Sim coached UNC in Tark for all of 2-seasons care to explain how you the ONLY OTHER COACH had two losing seasons? This despite the fact that I (Diablo) have no understanding of how graduations and EEs affect a programs ability to win? This is really where you want to take this? OK by all means go ahead.
4/16/2010 3:58 PM
1) I have proof.

2) You absolutely did. It was on the Big Ten CC....I've never once lied and have no need to fabricate this. Not surprising you're backtracking now though.

3) The point is taken. However, added along with other factors would be a good way in determining a winner of this challenge. If you understood the value of an Ivy education, you'd disagree with Trev as well.

4) Don't try and deflect the attention off this. I'll answer anything you want once we're done here. HD has nothing to do with what you challenged.
4/16/2010 4:00 PM
This diablo guy looks like his biggest claim to fame in Phelan is turning Tulane into a good, not great, team and then sullying his reputation to "OK" while doing nothing at SC for 6 seasons.

His claim to fame in Tark is making a D2 school great and turning LaSalle into an average team.

And yet he's bragging about his education and trying to call out other coaches? Huh? What am I missing here?
4/16/2010 4:10 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By diablo11 on 4/16/2010
1) I have proof. Just like you have proof of Mlat claiming to be king since you save the CC's. You know what show me that proof and I'll say publicly that I believe you went to those schools

2) You absolutely did. It was on the Big Ten CC....I've never once lied and have no need to fabricate this. Not surprising you're backtracking now though. Backtracking? From what who went to a better school? Who is smarter? You think that outside the realm of HD I actually give two $$hits about anything involving you? See, you again miss the point, I don't divulge where I went to school, or what my degrees or occupation are not because I am somehow worried that my schooling doesn't stack up; I dont have the need to throw my life in the face of randoms; I also don't have the misperception that I'm somehow better than a gas attendant or any other job you find the need to be dismissive of.

3) The point is taken. Amazing. However, added along with other factors would be a good way in determining a winner of this challenge. If you understood the value of an Ivy education, you'd disagree with Trev as well. You are now making two different points here. 1) That it (Ivy League Education) somehow makes a person smarter, which it doesn't. 2) "Understanding the value..." This has nothing to do with intelligence which is what you wanted to make the conversation about AND is a seperate subject by itself...that being "The impact of an Ivy League Education" there have been many papers written on the subject.

4) Don't try and deflect the attention off this. I'll answer anything you want once we're done here. HD has nothing to do with what you challenged. See, you don't control this conversation. And you say you dont care but many months since you've raised it you haven't moved on which means you do. I've said to you many months ago, answer my questions and we can get into other things. But I'm not closing one subject until its been finished. I will however, check out again in about 20 minutes or so and return in a couple of weeks when I can use a good laugh and drag you into the same childish rants and corny insults.

4/16/2010 4:14 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By cthomas22255 on 4/16/2010This diablo guy looks like his biggest claim to fame in Phelan is turning Tulane into a good, not great, team and then sullying his reputation to "OK" while doing nothing at SC for 6 seasons.

His claim to fame in Tark is making a D2 school great and turning LaSalle into an average team.

And yet he's bragging about his education and trying to call out other coaches? Huh? What am I missing here?
Nothing thats essentially the cliffsnotes version of everything Diablo.
4/16/2010 4:15 PM
Cthomas....you're missing the entire story. While I don't have the time to catch you up, just know that mlatsko and mmt are both frauds who attack my average resume with average resumes of their own. While I'm ok accepting criticism and trash talking, I don't accept it from two guys who completely incompetent. They are like AIG CEO's trash talking other businesses. So, I've made it my duty to put them in their place.....course, what I've realized is it's a losing battle. Both of them are so jawdroppingly dumb, they don't even understand when they've been embarrassed.

That's pretty much it....without going into too much detail
4/16/2010 4:16 PM
But mmt has a lot of deep postseason runs on his resume... maybe he brags (I don't know that he does), but I know a lot of guys would like to have coached Kansas to a final 4 in one of the hardest worlds, which he just did. Just looking at his teams, I'd say his resume isn't "average." He's built solid top-16 teams in multiple worlds. Are you saying that he did it fraudulently?
4/16/2010 4:24 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By diablo11 on 4/16/2010
Because it's to prove my point that 1/3 of your seasons are a complete failure. And what else is there to see other than a PT final four occasional appearance and mostly just a bunch of first rd. exits. Hardly impressive and it would probably only add to my argument.

Told you not to play with fire

Even if any of us had 1/3rd of our seasons being 'poor' its a whole helluva lot better then your 3/3.

(Predicted Aimbot response: Ok mr 148!)
4/16/2010 4:33 PM
1) Just like you have proof of Mlat claiming to be king since you save the CC's. You know what show me that proof and I'll say publicly that I believe you went to those schools.........wikipedia notable pennsylvania alumni. I'm on that list. Ask mlatsko if he said it or not. Like I said, I've never lied...and have no reason to lie.

2) Backtracking? From what who went to a better school? Who is smarter? You think that outside the realm of HD I actually give two $$hits about anything involving you? See, you again miss the point, I don't divulge where I went to school, or what my degrees or occupation are not because I am somehow worried that my schooling doesn't stack up; I dont have the need to throw my life in the face of randoms; I also don't have the misperception that I'm somehow better than a gas attendant or any other job you find the need to be dismissive of. ........no you're backtracking from the challenge you threw out there. The point was you claimed to be more intelligent than me....all I asked for is proof. You refuse to offer any after a challenge. Your views of the world and people are irrelevant. All we want is proof. Without proof, you lack credibility.

3) You are now making two different points here. 1) That it (Ivy League Education) somehow makes a person smarter, which it doesn't. 2) "Understanding the value..." This has nothing to do with intelligence which is what you wanted to make the conversation about AND is a seperate subject by itself...that being "The impact of an Ivy League Education" there have been many papers written on the subject. Whether you choose to believe it or not, Ivy league education does in fact make you smarter. It's a completely different way of learning that you cannot do anywhere else. That's why they're elite. They only take the best of the best and are only taught by the best of the best. You can't honestly believe a University of Arkansas education learns the same as UPENN? On to your second point, I realize the impact and only a small fraction is the "education". It's more about contacts and doors opening.

4) See, you don't control this conversation. And you say you dont care but many months since you've raised it you haven't moved on which means you do. I've said to you many months ago, answer my questions and we can get into other things. But I'm not closing one subject until its been finished. I will however, check out again in about 20 minutes or so and return in a couple of weeks when I can use a good laugh and drag you into the same childish rants and corny insults......I'm going to say this nicely, but I've answered your questions more than a handful of times. Just because you don't like the answers or can't comprehend them, doesn't mean I haven't answered them. And I do control this conversation....because, just like a puppet, I get you into this EVERY time I want. I lead you around like dangling a carrot in front of a horse. I'll set you up, and you'll predictably give me the exact answer I was looking for, and then I smash it out of the park, thus making you look stupid. It's like hitting a ball off a tee. And every few weeks, I get bored and decide to provoke you so I can do it again. You're entertainment.
4/16/2010 4:38 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By mlatsko1 on 4/16/2010You red-lined someone's post? Wow. More fail
I got a great laugh outta that too.
4/16/2010 4:38 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By cthomas22255 on 4/16/2010This diablo guy looks like his biggest claim to fame in Phelan is turning Tulane into a good, not great, team and then sullying his reputation to "OK" while doing nothing at SC for 6 seasons.

His claim to fame in Tark is making a D2 school great and turning LaSalle into an average team.

And yet he's bragging about his education and trying to call out other coaches? Huh? What am I missing here?
You got it all.
4/16/2010 4:40 PM
Oh you forgot the cherry picking part cthomas.
4/16/2010 4:41 PM
Zack,

Unless you decide to answer my question, you're on ermackey's level......IRRELEVANT!
4/16/2010 4:45 PM
◂ Prev 1|2|3|4|5|6...15 Next ▸

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.