Posted by antonsirius on 7/2/2010 9:31:00 AM (view original):
Posted by travisg on 7/2/2010 7:15:00 AM (view original):
As soon as the ripped-off n00b leaves the league, the lesson he's learned is lost, along with the talent his former franchise gave away for nothing.
So basically, your position is that the n00b is going to leave anyway, so while he's there he's going to damn well run the franchise the way you want him to.
Yeah, great league you've got there.
If vetoing is telling someone else how to run his franchise, I assume you would never veto any trade? If it's wrong to veto when a veteran owner rips off a noob, when should a veto be used? If you believe it's fine to build a better team at the expense of the world, you have no business calling anything else a "crap argument."