Trade Rape 101 - jrcpga & Clarkson Topic

plague believes it's the world's responsibility to make sure owners don't do anything "shifty".   I actually agree that it is the world's job.  However, and this is where plague and I differ, I believe, if I'm going to play Shifty Police, I can't do what I don't want others to do.  plague disagrees.

But he's right about soxfan121.   Restore balance my ***.   He's there to win games.   You can restore balance by taking the worst team possible.  He chose the best.
10/11/2010 8:31 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 10/11/2010 8:31:00 PM (view original):
plague believes it's the world's responsibility to make sure owners don't do anything "shifty".   I actually agree that it is the world's job.  However, and this is where plague and I differ, I believe, if I'm going to play Shifty Police, I can't do what I don't want others to do.  plague disagrees.

But he's right about soxfan121.   Restore balance my ***.   He's there to win games.   You can restore balance by taking the worst team possible.  He chose the best.
Two things we agree on in 1 day. I also appreciate the way you summed it up without making it personal.

By looking at Soxfan121 past he seems to have a history of taking on good teams, not saying all teams he took on were good, but he has taken on more than his fair share of super teams. He also has a history of bouncing around worlds. I just see way too many red flags.
10/11/2010 8:37 PM
No way would I pay $25 to play in that world..
10/11/2010 8:38 PM

If might chime in as one of these "newb" owners, it seems to me like a lot of us new players don't know the rules (and how can we know all the ins and outs as well as a vet owner?) and as cactus said, are gunshy about hitting that veto button.  I joined Clarkson as my very first league and realized that I had taken over a team of one and dones for almost all 16 previous seasons.  My team was worst in the league, and I really had no clue what I was doing.  But I had a blast because I could build the team with my own new players, and cactus's blog was entertaining as hell.  Anyways, I guess my point to all the vet owners out there who call Clarkson and others like it a "tard league" and whatnot, is that it seems like cultivating new owners is good for HBD on the whole.  A lot of us n00b owners as we're called, join public leagues like this one because we don't know to look elsewhere, or because the private leagues we do see require lots of experience and don't accept new owners, etc...  So I'm sure a lot new players who get taken advantage of tend to just say screw it and go spend their money elsewhere because there's no one there to veto because the good owners who do stick around find private leagues.   I'm guessing this is part of what went on in Clarkson for years.  I for one would like to help build Clarkson into a great world for newer players to join and learn and have fun, but not if I'm the only one.  I mean, I am green, so maybe I'm wrong on all this, and there are tons of new owners who don't run into these issues, but seems like with a lot of private worlds needing new owners, HBD could use all the players it can get right?

Anyways, that's my two cents for what it's worth, I am loving HBD even with the drama I've encountered in Clarkson, and there are numerous vet owners willing to help us new guys out learning the game.  Special thanks to tecwrg for his help as a mentor!

10/11/2010 8:56 PM
I'm not disagreeing that sox took over the team he did.  But that was the team that was abandoned and he came in.  It seems you fellas have a personal beef with him that I, one don't share, and two don't know the history of.  

That being said, he's been nothing but a help to the new owners that have come in the league.  Perhaps he's a little overzealous (passion is a good think in my book) about this particular topic.  But nonetheless, he's one of the people helping to make strides to remedy the problems of the world.  

It's beating a dead horse at this point.  No one is going to force jrcpga out and no one is going to bully him into leaving.  I'm taking the lead on making sure that doesn't happen now.   He'll simply have to play out the string so to speak.  Things will correct themselves with a little care.  It's probably just like when real baseball started.  Filled with uncompromising opportunists that took advantage.  It's something we're working on fixing.  


10/11/2010 9:10 PM
I am glad you enjoy the game, it's a very fun game. I can agree with your reasons for not vetoing. You don't know what your doing so you don't veto. I always tell new owners in the world I commish not to trade until you know what your doing. Who do you think will get the better of a trade, a veteran or a rookie? Veteran wins almost every time.

I made a few bad trades my first couple of seasons, but I can't believe that is a reason why someone would quit the game. I think that's a false reason some people try to push on the forums. I am betting people who supposedly quit the game because they made bad trades their first season would of quit the game anyway.
10/11/2010 9:11 PM
Posted by cactusmaz on 10/11/2010 9:10:00 PM (view original):
I'm not disagreeing that sox took over the team he did.  But that was the team that was abandoned and he came in.  It seems you fellas have a personal beef with him that I, one don't share, and two don't know the history of.  

That being said, he's been nothing but a help to the new owners that have come in the league.  Perhaps he's a little overzealous (passion is a good think in my book) about this particular topic.  But nonetheless, he's one of the people helping to make strides to remedy the problems of the world.  

It's beating a dead horse at this point.  No one is going to force jrcpga out and no one is going to bully him into leaving.  I'm taking the lead on making sure that doesn't happen now.   He'll simply have to play out the string so to speak.  Things will correct themselves with a little care.  It's probably just like when real baseball started.  Filled with uncompromising opportunists that took advantage.  It's something we're working on fixing.  


That may be the team he took over because it was abandon, but would of he taken over that abandon team if it was a crappy team? or would of he just let someone else take over that team? I think that is the part you are missing.

I look at his history and I see signs of a owner who wants the good teams handed to him. Everyone has their own preference, I like to take over lengthy rebuild teams that don't have long term contract problems. Some people like to take on immediate contenders, but don't act like you are trying to save the world from super teams while you personally take on a super team.
10/11/2010 9:18 PM
Here's my beef with soxfan121(and the reason he dislikes me with a passion):

Foxx was a in very similar situation as Clarkson.   A group of us, 12-13, decided to "clean it up".   He **** all over the idea.   Repeatedly.   Nonetheless, we cleaned it up.  The owner who had been trading with his alias left.   I agreed to sign in and snag his team as soon as it rolled.  I did.   The plan was to dismantle the super team, to an extent(every owner got one minor leaguer of their choice from the team), and help stabilize the world.  After the dispersal draft was done, I was handing the team off.   Trust me, it was still a very good team but it no longer had a limitless supply of stud minor leaguers to keep payroll extremely low.  Who lined up to take the team?   soxfan121.   Yep, the same guy who **** all over the idea of repairing Foxx.  I called him on it, repeatedly, and he hates me for it.   I'm obviously crushed but I'm dealing with it one day at a time.

So, when he comes in here ******** about a super team, and he has a better record in the same world, I'm not real interested in hearing about it. 
10/11/2010 9:36 PM
Well that's all unfortunate and I can't speak of any of that with Foxx as I wasn't a part of it.  But you obviously understand trying to clean things up.  Plague I don't feel I'm missing the point, but I do understand where you're coming from.  It's just that I don't know what he'd do if the situation unfolded differently.  I can't worry about that.  I just want to clean this world up.  

I for one don't care what kind of team I take over.  Each is a new challenge, and although I haven't had many, none were hand picked.   The one I just took over in Kinsella is full of strange contracts . . . it will be fun to see how I can mold it.  

You both have what seems to be justified points of view; I just don't share similar experiences so it's tough to quantify.  I will take note though.  Thanks for the pleasant discourse.  New knowledge is good.  
10/11/2010 9:55 PM
Good luck with your world. You appear to have a good attitude when discussing your world. He probably won't leave of his own, but it sounds like your world has the desire to veto lopsided trades, unless they follow through with their threat and leave the world, in which case the world will most likely revert back to it's old patterns. Which would also lead me to believe that the leaving owners were not serious about cleaning up Clarkson.
10/11/2010 10:10 PM
Posted by plague on 10/11/2010 9:18:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cactusmaz on 10/11/2010 9:10:00 PM (view original):
I'm not disagreeing that sox took over the team he did.  But that was the team that was abandoned and he came in.  It seems you fellas have a personal beef with him that I, one don't share, and two don't know the history of.  

That being said, he's been nothing but a help to the new owners that have come in the league.  Perhaps he's a little overzealous (passion is a good think in my book) about this particular topic.  But nonetheless, he's one of the people helping to make strides to remedy the problems of the world.  

It's beating a dead horse at this point.  No one is going to force jrcpga out and no one is going to bully him into leaving.  I'm taking the lead on making sure that doesn't happen now.   He'll simply have to play out the string so to speak.  Things will correct themselves with a little care.  It's probably just like when real baseball started.  Filled with uncompromising opportunists that took advantage.  It's something we're working on fixing.  


That may be the team he took over because it was abandon, but would of he taken over that abandon team if it was a crappy team? or would of he just let someone else take over that team? I think that is the part you are missing.

I look at his history and I see signs of a owner who wants the good teams handed to him. Everyone has their own preference, I like to take over lengthy rebuild teams that don't have long term contract problems. Some people like to take on immediate contenders, but don't act like you are trying to save the world from super teams while you personally take on a super team.
So is he dismantling his newly aquired super team in Clarkson or is he just being super nice to all the newbies who're dumping money into the world with no chance of winning?
10/11/2010 10:15 PM
We've decided we're going to stick and clean it up that way.  

No dismantling has taken place as of yet.  
10/11/2010 10:45 PM
Posted by plague on 10/11/2010 8:11:00 PM (view original):
And its a holiday.
Actually it already is.

Thanks for taking the time to celebrate Thanksgiving with your Northern Neighbours. 
10/11/2010 11:33 PM
Posted by iain on 10/11/2010 11:33:00 PM (view original):
Posted by plague on 10/11/2010 8:11:00 PM (view original):
And its a holiday.
Actually it already is.

Thanks for taking the time to celebrate Thanksgiving with your Northern Neighbours. 
Have a good Thanksgiving.... It's columbus day in America.
10/12/2010 12:00 AM
Posted by soxfan121 on 10/11/2010 5:49:00 PM (view original):
Oh, and since I ignore MikeT, I have no idea what kind of crap he's spouting. I hope he's focused his considerable free time and charm to calling out and belittling jrcpga as only MikeT can do. But since I have little faith, MikeT has probably chosen to grind his considerable axe with me. 

FTR, I quit MikeT run worlds because I can't stand MikeT. I'm sure more than a few of you feel the same. If not - hey, different strokes for different folks. I took over a team in Foxx AFTER MikeT helped bust-it-up and have spent my time there educating new owners and contributing to the cleanup effort. I've spent more time in that world - and in all public worlds - than MikeT has and while I respect MikeT's knowledge of the game, I find his act to be overbearing, infantile and annoying. So, I ignore him and his posts. 

If anyone has questions about my efforts or motivations, I'm happy to answer them. Unless you are MikeT - he can go **** himself.

FWIW, I really, really like MikeT and disagree with every single word that sox has said here.

That being said, Mike, I've told you...I like the guy and he has been a great asset to Foxx.  I don't know about Clarkson, but I can only assume that he has been good there too.

And sox, really, i think you should lighten up on MikeT as well. You don't play in his worlds, and they are largely private, so they shouldn't bother you in your efforts.

Both of you guys...you find entertainment within the game in different ways.  I hate to see two people who are by and large good for HBD going at eachother like this. I wouldn't want to think that someone turns out disliking one guy because they listen to what the other has to say, when I really don't think there is anything bad about either of you.

Most of the time I wouldn't care about stuff like this, because whoever you guys are going after probably deserve it/and/or are idiots...but that isn't the case here.

10/12/2010 1:19 PM
◂ Prev 1|2|3|4|5|6...10 Next ▸
Trade Rape 101 - jrcpga & Clarkson Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.