Didn't connect too many stones with Brook at all. Good job all.

i would like to quietly object to the usage of 'who am i' in the context of a multi party answer. anyway these are cool but i am too clueless to participate. i shall return to watching from afar. its a cool thing riddle_face, nice job with these.

"Who am I?" and "Who are we?" are not the same thing.

And a brook doesn't necessarily have "too many stones," it just has stones.

Love your work, RiddleFace, but this one sucked.

“Who are we” would have been too easy. The first line of the clue indicated there were multiple answers, as well as there being 2 Riddle Points. Others figured it out.

‘Too’ many stones was to balance out the first and second lines. Two and one, one and too.

Sorry if it messed you up.

Revised version for the truthers:
Really tall brothers from Stanford.
Who are we?

i was good with it being a multiple answer until you specifically shot dogg's question down, FYI. like i said - i think its cool what you are doing. please don't take my nitpick as anything but. i figure that was only partially (or maybe none) a response to me, but on the side of caution - i just wanted to emphasize the 'i think its cool what you are doing' part of my message.

Yeah I was thrown by the "Who am I?" but I'll take it. There were people guessing multiples & riddle didn't confirm or deny.

Creative either way.

Looking forward to the next one!

Posted by RiddleFace on 6/28/2020 5:59:00 PM (view original):
“Who are we” would have been too easy. The first line of the clue indicated there were multiple answers, as well as there being 2 Riddle Points. Others figured it out.

‘Too’ many stones was to balance out the first and second lines. Two and one, one and too.

Sorry if it messed you up.

Revised version for the truthers:
Really tall brothers from Stanford.
Who are we?

7-foot twins from Stanford. Must be Jason and Jarron Collins.