Posted by jcred5 on 6/29/2021 1:06:00 PM (view original):
Just saw that, unless I missed it that was release today. Do you think that has been used and now made transparent? Or also newly factoring in.

Yes, in the release today

Posted by jcred5 on 6/29/2021 1:15:00 PM (view original):
BB reference defines it as estimated TO's per 100 plays. But WIS must mean touches (by which I mean plays run through that player based on their usage, not team plays). So Harden's 18-19 40 usage season is 14.5 TOV%. Which is close to his per48 multiplied out to 100 at 13.5. Another player undrafted with 14.4 usage and 3.0 TOp48 is at 19.5 TOV%. Interesting, wonder if there are other factors besides just TO's and usage.

Bball also has the tov% as defined by usage.

I cannot believe my decade old request has been granted!! Holy ****!!

Posted by ashamael on 6/29/2021 1:56:00 PM (view original):

Posted by jcred5 on 6/29/2021 1:15:00 PM (view original):
BB reference defines it as estimated TO's per 100 plays. But WIS must mean touches (by which I mean plays run through that player based on their usage, not team plays). So Harden's 18-19 40 usage season is 14.5 TOV%. Which is close to his per48 multiplied out to 100 at 13.5. Another player undrafted with 14.4 usage and 3.0 TOp48 is at 19.5 TOV%. Interesting, wonder if there are other factors besides just TO's and usage.

Bball also has the tov% as defined by usage.

I cannot believe my decade old request has been granted!! Holy ****!!

Its crazy how many simple requests took a long time to process...........

Posted by ncmusician_7 on 6/29/2021 2:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by ashamael on 6/29/2021 1:56:00 PM (view original):

Posted by jcred5 on 6/29/2021 1:15:00 PM (view original):
BB reference defines it as estimated TO's per 100 plays. But WIS must mean touches (by which I mean plays run through that player based on their usage, not team plays). So Harden's 18-19 40 usage season is 14.5 TOV%. Which is close to his per48 multiplied out to 100 at 13.5. Another player undrafted with 14.4 usage and 3.0 TOp48 is at 19.5 TOV%. Interesting, wonder if there are other factors besides just TO's and usage.

Bball also has the tov% as defined by usage.

I cannot believe my decade old request has been granted!! Holy ****!!

Its crazy how many simple requests took a long time to process...........

Funny thing, they just got stuck in the queue. Simple mistake!

10 picks away with no picks in almost 24, yet I’m feeling pretty confident that I’m picking tonight.

we can search for tov% now?......whaaaaaaaaat

never thought id see this day...is 100 d bill russell next?

So I've gotten better at identifying the best fit for my next pick (Kawhi)
I've also improved at figuring out who makes the most sense if the above guy gets taken (Dr. J)


Where I am doomed to a lower half finish is not having a clue what to do when they both go....

Posted by 20ks on 6/29/2021 6:33:00 PM (view original):
So I've gotten better at identifying the best fit for my next pick (Kawhi)
I've also improved at figuring out who makes the most sense if the above guy gets taken (Dr. J)


Where I am doomed to a lower half finish is not having a clue what to do when they both go....

If it helps, all 3 guys on Ash's proxy list went in the last 4 picks.

technically we didn't wait 24 hours for amerk......?

technically.....there is no 24 hour rule in this league......?

don't shoot

Your second statement trumps the first. Personally, I'd rather have had amerk than kinoa since I doubt amerk takes the same guys kinoa takes, which means I get one of my three guys I really wanted there and assumed would be there since the Savage King himself wasn't drafting behind me when I made my original selection!

Taking Dream and Big Ben as my first two might be a mess-up. I just figured I'm not great a drafting, so go against the usual big + guard guys get for their first two. Plus, I've got a great start to leading the league in STOCKS. I am going to end up hurting at some perimeter position, but's that's "Later JP's" problem.

Posted by bds9992 on 6/29/2021 8:06:00 PM (view original):
technically we didn't wait 24 hours for amerk......?

technically.....there is no 24 hour rule in this league......?

don't shoot

there is a 24 hour rule - it starts in the 2nd round...amerk wasnt skipped, he was replaced

one of the reasons the 1st round is untimed is so i can make sure we have 24 committed owners...i dont know if something is going to happen to an owner from the time they say "yes im in" to the time of their 1st round pick..its up to me to determine if someone needs to be replaced so we can get the draft started, and there is no set time for that...amerk knew on the 20th that the league was starting up, and he should know from previous experience that it doesnt take long at all to fill

however...i do regret the hasty replacement...amerk has been with us since the beginning and i owed him more time to show up for his pick then i gave him...i should have at least waited until tonight...like a lot of us, i was in a rush to get started and made a poor judgement call

Trying my hardest not to regret the Rudy pick. I just can't wrap my head around 50 eFG% from anyone in the first round for two or more seasons. Definitely have been thinking about the Admiral, but, still not sure I would do it. We'll see how this all works out. I'm trying not to do anything crazy for my next pick, but we'll see

I'm around should we make it that far tonight. If not I'll proxy

"dB and the Year of Living Dangerously" - coming soon to a theater near you