going to make another stab at it, but here are the two configs I'm looking at right now. One is a little more balanced while the other is a little more focused on two teams.

I hate wis formatting.

Name	Season	Usg	efg%	TS%	ast%	3pm	def	stl%	blk%	orb%	drb%	crb%	tov%	fouled%	pf/48
Build 7.0.1	Team 1	116.3	54.8	59.3	74.4	392	75.8	7.4	8.9	39.5	90.3	129.8	12.9	12.1	19.11
Build 7.0.1	Team 2	111.6	54	59.3	69.9	427	76.2	7.5	9.6	38.2	91.4	129.6	12.8	13	19.27
Build 7.0.1	Team 3	110.4	54.3	59.3	77.4	404	74.9	7.6	10	38.4	89.7	128.1	13.3	13	20.23
Build 7.0.1	Team 4	106.5	54	58.8	79.9	442	71	8.5	9.1	37.6	88.9	126.4	13.1	13	20.67
Build 7.0.1	Team 5	117.7	52.7	57.5	72.8	379	70	7.8	9.1	37.6	91.6	129.1	12.5	12.4	17.09
Build 7.0.1	5 Team Average	112.5	53.9	58.8	74.9	409	73.6	7.8	9.3	38.2	90.4	128.6	12.9	12.7	19.27

So much.

Name	Season	Usg	efg%	TS%	ast%	3pm	def	stl%	blk%	orb%	drb%	crb%	tov%	fouled%	pf/48
Build 6.2.1	Team 1	116.8	54.9	59.4	75.8	392	77.4	7.6	9.6	39.5	91.3	130.8	12.9	12.1	19.44
Build 6.2.1	Team 2	112.4	54.2	59.4	70	429	78.4	7.7	9.7	38.1	92.3	130.4	12.8	12.8	18.92
Build 6.2.1	Team 3	108	54.2	58.8	77	404	71.2	8.2	8.5	38.6	88.8	127.5	13.6	12.7	19.43
Build 6.2.1	Team 4	113.1	53.1	58.3	80.1	344	70.4	8.2	9.1	40.2	87.7	127.9	12.9	13	19.77
Build 6.2.1	Team 5	109.8	53.4	58.1	71.9	453	70.1	7.1	9.7	35.5	91.9	127.4	12.6	13	18.72
Build 6.2.1	5 Team Average	112	53.9	58.8	75	404	73.5	7.8	9.3	38.4	90.4	128.8	13	12.7	19.25

Hate how low my efg is. fts may make my ts passable though.

min		def	3s	ftm	fp48	usage	efg	oreb	dreb	ast	tov	CREb	FT%	ftm/36	stl%	blk%	per	paint
19390	241.19	70.51	566.00	2191.00	20.13	118.60	53.93	35.80	106.21	62.61	13.12	142.01	77.68	20.34	7.36	12.05	18.24	40.82
19390	241.19	74.11	474.00	2058.00	19.03	118.54	52.90	33.94	99.63	60.94	12.29	133.58	77.42	18.94	7.64	11.38	15.75	39.77
19390	241.19	70.42	461.00	2219.00	18.93	124.90	53.00	36.72	98.85	65.94	11.71	135.58	77.85	20.60	8.45	11.43	13.47	41.73
19390	241.19	71.43	475.00	2167.00	19.71	120.56	52.84	34.19	97.55	65.22	11.81	131.74	76.98	20.12	8.78	11.26	15.80	41.10
19390	241.19	80.85	593.00	2497.00	19.21	122.79	52.23	36.60	96.46	69.14	12.34	133.06	74.58	23.18	10.15	9.83	19.25	43.95
	avg	73.465	513.800	2226.400	19.403	121.078	52.981	35.451	99.742	64.770	12.254	135.193	76.903	20.635	8.474	11.190	16.500	41.474

This is what chat gpt thinks of my team:

Title: An All-Star Lineup: Evaluating the Performance of James Harden, Clint Capela, Marcus Camby, Andre Iguodala, Montrezl Harrell, James Worthy, Brandon Ingram, Andrew Bogut, Michael Cooper, and Ivica Zubac.

Introduction:
In this review, we will analyze the performances of some prominent basketball players who have left a mark on the court.

1. James Harden:
James Harden is a dominant force on the court, known for his scoring ability and exceptional ball-handling skills. His offensive prowess, combined with his playmaking abilities, has made him one of the most exciting players to watch in recent years. Harden's ability to create shots for himself and his teammates has earned him numerous accolades and a place among the NBA's elite.

2. Clint Capela:
Clint Capela is a skilled center known for his defensive presence and rebounding ability. His athleticism and shot-blocking skills make him a valuable asset on the court. Capela's ability to finish at the rim and provide second-chance opportunities for his team have made him an integral part of successful teams.

3. Marcus Camby:
Marcus Camby was a defensive stalwart during his time in the NBA. Known for his shot-blocking ability and rebounding prowess, Camby was a force to be reckoned with in the paint. His defensive contributions helped anchor many teams and establish a strong presence in the paint.

4. Andre Iguodala:
Andre Iguodala is a versatile player known for his defensive prowess and high basketball IQ. His ability to guard multiple positions and make timely plays on both ends of the court has made him a valuable asset to championship-winning teams. Iguodala's leadership and experience have also been instrumental in guiding his teams to success.

5. Montrezl Harrell:
Montrezl Harrell is an energetic and relentless player known for his hustle and tenacity. His ability to finish strong at the rim, grab offensive rebounds, and provide a spark off the bench has made him a fan favorite. Harrell's energy and determination on the court make him a valuable asset for any team.

6. James Worthy:
James Worthy, also known as "Big Game James," was a key player during the Showtime era of the Los Angeles Lakers. His ability to score in transition and his clutch performances in big moments earned him a reputation as a reliable scorer. Worthy's athleticism and versatility made him a vital contributor to the Lakers' success.

7. Brandon Ingram:
Brandon Ingram is a talented young player known for his scoring ability and length. His ability to create his own shot and score from various spots on the court has made him a promising player for the future. Ingram's development and potential have sparked excitement among fans and analysts alike.

8. Andrew Bogut:
Andrew Bogut is a skilled center known for his defensive presence and basketball IQ. His ability to protect the rim and set effective screens has made him a valuable asset to his teams. Bogut's experience and basketball intelligence have helped him excel on both ends of the court.

9. Michael Cooper:
Michael Cooper was a defensive specialist known for his tenacious defense and ability to guard multiple positions. His defensive intensity and ability to disrupt opponents' offenses were crucial to the success of the "Showtime" Lakers. Cooper's contributions on the defensive end were highly valued by his teammates and coaches.

10. Ivica Zubac:
Ivica Zubac is a young center with promising potential. His size and rebounding ability make him a presence in the paint. Zubac's development and growth as a player have shown promise, and he has the potential to become a key contributor in the future.

Conclusion:
These players have showcased their skills and made significant contributions to the game of basketball. From the scoring prowess of James Harden to the defensive presence of Marcus Camby and the versatility of Andre Iguodala, each player brings a unique skill set to the court.

I’d like to see what it says about a bad player. “By drinking too much the night before the big game, his coach refused to put him into the game and thanks to addition by subtraction his team won.”

Here’s chat GPT’s take on midges team:
The fantasy draft review for the NBA players Karl Malone, Moses Malone, John Stockton, Jayson Tatum, Brandon Clarke, Enes Kanter, Terry Tyler, Jaylen Brown, Maurice Cheeks, Jonathan Isaac, Bailey Howell, and Tony Bradley is as follows:

Karl Malone: Despite his impressive career statistics, Malone's lack of success in the playoffs and questionable on-court behavior make him a risky fantasy draft choice.

Moses Malone: While Moses Malone had a solid career, his declining performance in his later years and limited contributions in key statistical categories make him a less desirable option for a fantasy team.

John Stockton: Stockton's consistent playmaking and assists are valuable, but his lack of scoring and limited defensive contributions make him a less attractive fantasy draft pick.

Jayson Tatum: Tatum has shown flashes of brilliance, but his inconsistency and inability to consistently impact multiple statistical categories make him a risky choice for a fantasy team.

Brandon Clarke: Although Clarke has potential, his limited playing time and inconsistent performances make him a speculative fantasy draft pick at this point.

Enes Kanter: Kanter's defensive liabilities and limited offensive versatility make him a less desirable option for a fantasy team.

Terry Tyler: Tyler's lack of consistent playing time and limited statistical contributions make him an unappealing choice for a fantasy team.

Jaylen Brown: While Brown has shown improvement, his inconsistent shooting and lack of playmaking skills make him a less reliable option for a fantasy team.

Maurice Cheeks: Cheeks' career was solid, but his limited scoring and lack of three-point shooting make him a less appealing fantasy draft pick.

Jonathan Isaac: Isaac's injury history and limited offensive contributions make him a risky choice for a fantasy team.

Bailey Howell: Howell's career was respectable, but his declining performance in his later years and limited statistical categories make him a less attractive option for a fantasy team.

Tony Bradley: Bradley's limited playing time and lack of significant statistical contributions make him an unappealing choice for a fantasy team.

Overall, this group of players has a mix of inconsistent performances, declining careers, limited statistical contributions, and injury concerns, making them less desirable options for a fantasy draft.

So if any one of my teams has at least 16 wins I should be thrilled.

Almost full! Let’s get those last few teams in!

Final Config's breakdown:

Name	Season	Usg	efg%	TS%	ast%	3pm	def	stl%	blk%	orb%	drb%	crb%	tov%	fouled%	pf/48
Build 6.2.3	Team 1	116.8	54.9	59.4	75.8	392	77.4	7.6	9.6	39.5	91.3	130.8	12.9	12.1	19.44
Build 6.2.3	Team 2	111.5	54.2	59.5	70.1	427	76.6	7.4	9.9	37.7	92.1	129.7	12.7	12.9	19.28
Build 6.2.3	Team 3	108.5	54.4	58.9	78.8	408	70.6	8.2	8.8	39.2	89.3	128.5	13.6	12.8	19.38
Build 6.2.3	Team 4	106.2	54.2	59.3	75.8	405	72.5	8.2	8.9	40.9	89.4	130.2	13.3	13.2	19.98
Build 6.2.3	Team 5	112.9	52.2	57	74.7	433	70.4	7.4	9.6	36.8	90.8	127.6	12.5	12.8	18.8
Build 6.2.3	5 Team Average	111.2	54	58.8	75	413	73.5	7.7	9.4	38.8	90.6	129.4	13	12.8	19.37

5 team Average difference from last Savage:

Usg	efg%	TS%	ast%	3pm	def	stl%	blk%	orb%	drb%	crb%	tov%	fouled%	pf/48
7.6	-0.5	-1	9.6	-10	3.1	-0.1	0.4	1.1	-7.3	-6.2	-0.1	-0.4	0.08
107.34%	99.08%	98.33%	114.68%	97.64%	104.40%	98.72%	104.44%	102.92%	92.54%	95.43%	99.24%	96.97%	100.41%

Not sure how things are going to work out. Overall numbers are decent enough, but I'm not sure I'm far enough ahead in any category that matters to be reliably ahead of .500. We'll see what happens.

Looks like we’re full!

PLAY BALL!

list for the randomizer...

jhsukow
gerryred
24kpyrite
robusk
jcred5
dh555
benhoidal
midge
raggedclaws
chewy3344
edsortails
ashamael
dbkc
pbandj
berkelon
tarheel1991
steelers821
uptowngbv
riftonapple
ncmusician_7
20ks
kammeyer
beloud
bds9992

There were 24 items in your list. Here they are in random order:

1. tarheel1991
2. raggedclaws
3. beloud
4. chewy3344
5. robusk
6. ncmusician_7
7. pbandj
8. steelers821
9. bds9992
10. ashamael
11. dbkc
12. benhoidal
13. kammeyer
14. jhsukow
15. edsortails
16. riftonapple
17. gerryred
18. 20ks
19. berkelon
20. uptowngbv
21. 24kpyrite
22. midge
23. dh555
24. jcred5

World 1	World 2	World 3	World 4	World 5
jhsukow	20ks	steelers821	chewy3344	dbkc
beloud	gerryred	kammeyer	uptowngbv	edsortails
pbandj	bds9992	20ks	robusk	bds9992
kammeyer	chewy3344	ashamael	steelers821	kammeyer
benhoidal	ashamael	tarheel1991	tarheel1991	steelers821
edsortails	uptowngbv	benhoidal	ncmusician_7	uptowngbv
bds9992	dbkc	chewy3344	pbandj	ncmusician_7
ncmusician_7	jhsukow	24kpyrite	raggedclaws	gerryred
steelers821	jcred5	bds9992	24kpyrite	benhoidal
ashamael	24kpyrite	ncmusician_7	ashamael	robusk
riftonapple	beloud	edsortails	gerryred	raggedclaws
jcred5	tarheel1991	midge	benhoidal	beloud
uptowngbv	pbandj	gerryred	dbkc	jcred5
gerryred	riftonapple	robusk	bds9992	pbandj
berkelon	raggedclaws	dh555	riftonapple	24kpyrite
dh555	kammeyer	beloud	beloud	20ks
midge	berkelon	jcred5	midge	midge
tarheel1991	ncmusician_7	pbandj	kammeyer	berkelon
dbkc	dh555	uptowngbv	edsortails	dh555
24kpyrite	edsortails	berkelon	berkelon	ashamael
20ks	robusk	riftonapple	dh555	tarheel1991
chewy3344	steelers821	dbkc	jcred5	jhsukow
robusk	midge	jhsukow	20ks	riftonapple
raggedclaws	benhoidal	raggedclaws	jhsukow	chewy3344

Divisions ranked by AvgWins

Row Labels	Sum of AvgWins
W1, Div 4	267
W5, Div 2	265
W5, Div 4	263
W2, Div 4	261
W2, Div 2	259
W1, Div 2	255
W4, Div 2	255
W4, Div 1	254
W3, Div 1	253
W4, Div 3	253
W3, Div 3	252
W3, Div 2	252
W3, Div 4	250
W2, Div 3	246
W4, Div 4	246
W1, Div 1	244
W1, Div 3	242
W2, Div 1	241
W5, Div 3	240
W5, Div 1	239

Divisions ranked by sum avg championships per season:

Row Labels	Sum of Championships
W1, Div 4	2.40
W5, Div 2	2.13
W4, Div 2	1.82
W2, Div 4	1.71
W2, Div 2	1.61
W4, Div 1	1.41
W3, Div 1	1.37
W3, Div 4	1.37
W3, Div 3	1.36
W5, Div 4	1.24
W1, Div 1	1.00
W5, Div 1	0.96
W4, Div 3	0.91
W2, Div 3	0.86
W3, Div 2	0.82
W4, Div 4	0.77
W1, Div 2	0.76
W1, Div 3	0.74
W2, Div 1	0.73
W5, Div 3	0.58