Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 9:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DoctorKz on 7/17/2018 9:15:00 PM (view original):
Strzok led both investigations, Clinton and Trump, his text messages are clearly slanted against Trump. Horowitz's report was clear, he was biased. In no way should he have taken part in either investigation. Once the Bureau got wind of the messages, he was out. The investigations are forever tainted. No pun intended...

Yet he ****** Clinton and not Trump, 11 days before the election.


Crazy.

She did it to herself. Yet she amuses us by blaming everyone without the initials HRC. ..

Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 9:29:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:23:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 9:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:06:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 9:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 8:55:00 PM (view original):
https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/13/opinions/strzok-hearing-bias-opinion-callan/index.html



Here it is again so that Tang can learn to read. From CNN...not exactly a DJT supportive site.




Some may assume that if Strzok really wanted to sabotage the election of Trump all he had to do was leak the fact that the FBI was investigating Trump. But that logic doesn't fly. Strzok would have feared loss of his job or possible criminal prosecution for such a leak -- particularly if classified information were involved. The true test of Strzok's biases and intentions can be found in his malicious text messages.

His text messages are just that, text messages. For someone hellbent on destroying Trump, he sure was kinda a ***** about it if he was fearful for his job.

We agree. He is a sissy boy.

Let me ask you this Taint. You are about to play a hoops game against another team and I am your ref. I walk over to you and say, man you guys should lose 100-0 and you are all losers and then laugh. Do you think I will be an unbiased ref?

Honestly.

I don't know. You said earlier this week you could be unbiased in the work you do for clients even when you don't like them. I'm certainly capable of it. What makes you think he can't either?

Answer my question please. Yes or No. If you had to bet your life would you say I would be unbiased.

To answer you. I don't text fellow bankers stating how I wish these clients would go bankrupt. I also told you that I have a higher moral compass than Petey. I would never cheat on my wife and embarrass her the way he did. If he lied to his wife he can lie to Congress and the American People.

Taint? Where is my answer....Yes or No. Don't wuss out and say IDK.

It's a dumb hypothetical.

The ref isn't going to play the game for us. Just because you may be biased doesn't mean what you say is going to come true.

No but say some fans hear that. Don't you think their perception will be that the ref is biased?

Posted by DoctorKz on 7/17/2018 9:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 9:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DoctorKz on 7/17/2018 9:15:00 PM (view original):
Strzok led both investigations, Clinton and Trump, his text messages are clearly slanted against Trump. Horowitz's report was clear, he was biased. In no way should he have taken part in either investigation. Once the Bureau got wind of the messages, he was out. The investigations are forever tainted. No pun intended...

Yet he ****** Clinton and not Trump, 11 days before the election.


Crazy.

She did it to herself. Yet she amuses us by blaming everyone without the initials HRC. ..

Comey writes: “Assuming, as nearly everyone did, that Hillary Clinton would be elected president of the United States in less than two weeks, what would happen to the FBI, the justice department or her own presidency if it later was revealed, after the fact, that she still was the subject of an FBI investigation?”

Posted by DoctorKz on 7/17/2018 9:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 9:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DoctorKz on 7/17/2018 9:15:00 PM (view original):
Strzok led both investigations, Clinton and Trump, his text messages are clearly slanted against Trump. Horowitz's report was clear, he was biased. In no way should he have taken part in either investigation. Once the Bureau got wind of the messages, he was out. The investigations are forever tainted. No pun intended...

Yet he ****** Clinton and not Trump, 11 days before the election.


Crazy.

She did it to herself. Yet she amuses us by blaming everyone without the initials HRC. ..

I've explained 1000 times on these pages how it was re-opened. Probably going to end up in charges against Guliani and agents in the NY FBI office in the end. Whoever "thomas Paine" was and the person behind the Gateway Pundit.

Comey writes: “Assuming, as nearly everyone did, that Hillary Clinton would be elected president of the United States in less than two weeks, what would happen to the FBI, the justice department or her own presidency if it later was revealed, after the fact, that she still was the subject of an FBI investigation?”

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 9:29:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:23:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 9:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:06:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 9:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 8:55:00 PM (view original):
https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/13/opinions/strzok-hearing-bias-opinion-callan/index.html



Here it is again so that Tang can learn to read. From CNN...not exactly a DJT supportive site.




Some may assume that if Strzok really wanted to sabotage the election of Trump all he had to do was leak the fact that the FBI was investigating Trump. But that logic doesn't fly. Strzok would have feared loss of his job or possible criminal prosecution for such a leak -- particularly if classified information were involved. The true test of Strzok's biases and intentions can be found in his malicious text messages.

His text messages are just that, text messages. For someone hellbent on destroying Trump, he sure was kinda a ***** about it if he was fearful for his job.

We agree. He is a sissy boy.

Let me ask you this Taint. You are about to play a hoops game against another team and I am your ref. I walk over to you and say, man you guys should lose 100-0 and you are all losers and then laugh. Do you think I will be an unbiased ref?

Honestly.

I don't know. You said earlier this week you could be unbiased in the work you do for clients even when you don't like them. I'm certainly capable of it. What makes you think he can't either?

Answer my question please. Yes or No. If you had to bet your life would you say I would be unbiased.

To answer you. I don't text fellow bankers stating how I wish these clients would go bankrupt. I also told you that I have a higher moral compass than Petey. I would never cheat on my wife and embarrass her the way he did. If he lied to his wife he can lie to Congress and the American People.

Taint? Where is my answer....Yes or No. Don't wuss out and say IDK.

It's a dumb hypothetical.

The ref isn't going to play the game for us. Just because you may be biased doesn't mean what you say is going to come true.

No but say some fans hear that. Don't you think their perception will be that the ref is biased?

Sure.

PS had people under him and over him scrutinizing his work constantly. If he was so afraid to lose his job, he wouldn't have fudged anything. It's all in his testimony. You should watch it.

Recently announced that Wednesday games are rained out...too many can't access their teams yet...

Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 9:36:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 9:29:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:23:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 9:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:06:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/17/2018 9:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 8:55:00 PM (view original):
https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/13/opinions/strzok-hearing-bias-opinion-callan/index.html



Here it is again so that Tang can learn to read. From CNN...not exactly a DJT supportive site.




Some may assume that if Strzok really wanted to sabotage the election of Trump all he had to do was leak the fact that the FBI was investigating Trump. But that logic doesn't fly. Strzok would have feared loss of his job or possible criminal prosecution for such a leak -- particularly if classified information were involved. The true test of Strzok's biases and intentions can be found in his malicious text messages.

His text messages are just that, text messages. For someone hellbent on destroying Trump, he sure was kinda a ***** about it if he was fearful for his job.

We agree. He is a sissy boy.

Let me ask you this Taint. You are about to play a hoops game against another team and I am your ref. I walk over to you and say, man you guys should lose 100-0 and you are all losers and then laugh. Do you think I will be an unbiased ref?

Honestly.

I don't know. You said earlier this week you could be unbiased in the work you do for clients even when you don't like them. I'm certainly capable of it. What makes you think he can't either?

Answer my question please. Yes or No. If you had to bet your life would you say I would be unbiased.

To answer you. I don't text fellow bankers stating how I wish these clients would go bankrupt. I also told you that I have a higher moral compass than Petey. I would never cheat on my wife and embarrass her the way he did. If he lied to his wife he can lie to Congress and the American People.

Taint? Where is my answer....Yes or No. Don't wuss out and say IDK.

It's a dumb hypothetical.

The ref isn't going to play the game for us. Just because you may be biased doesn't mean what you say is going to come true.

No but say some fans hear that. Don't you think their perception will be that the ref is biased?

Sure.

PS had people under him and over him scrutinizing his work constantly. If he was so afraid to lose his job, he wouldn't have fudged anything. It's all in his testimony. You should watch it.

I actually don't have issue with him texting and such. My issue is him lying to Congress about his bias and looking like a smug A hole. Everyone has bias. In this debate you and I have bias. You are not human if you don't have bias. The country is so polarized we can't even have a civil debate. Your *** hole friends, Tang and bad luck cower and won't even state why they think Jason Whitlock is an idiot.

I stated why I think Kellerman is.

In the end it doesn't matter. People have their minds made up and only see what they want to see.

All I know is that if I was Strzok's boss, I entrusted a guy that has put me and everyone else at the FBI on the hot seat...

Posted by DoctorKz on 7/17/2018 9:37:00 PM (view original):
Recently announced that Wednesday games are rained out...too many can't access their teams yet...

Oh boy. This SIM upgrade has some bugs man.

Posted by DoctorKz on 7/17/2018 9:40:00 PM (view original):
All I know is that if I was Strzok's boss, I entrusted a guy that has put me and everyone else at the FBI on the hot seat...

Because of Strzok whatever comes out of that report people won't believe it was unbiased.

People still think the moon landing is fake also. And that the world is flat.

And that there is not such thing as Radical Islam...9/11 was self induced

Posted by DoctorKz on 7/17/2018 9:40:00 PM (view original):
All I know is that if I was Strzok's boss, I entrusted a guy that has put me and everyone else at the FBI on the hot seat...

If he hadn't of removed him, then there's a problem, but Mueller removed him as soon as he found out about it.

Did PS force the Trump campaign to jump through multiple hoops and hurdles to meet with foreign nationals about stolen emails and promised dirt on HRC? Did PS then force the Trump transition team to lie about the meetings continually?


It's not bias that got Trump and his pals into these problems. It's their own actions.

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/17/2018 9:46:00 PM (view original):
And that there is not such thing as Radical Islam...9/11 was self induced

Yup...or radical christians had nothing to do with the Olympic, abortion clinics, or Oklahoma City bombings. They were all inside jobs.