STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS 2009-10 Topic

This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
I think were in for a treat if they play eachother. it really had a playoff atmosphere last night and both teams fought hard. lu has been the difference in the season series between the teams. when he's been on Vancouver has won both. when he's been off Chicago has taken advantage. I really hope we see this matchup this spring. its just excellent hockey to watch.
2/5/2011 1:35 PM
The Hawks had 6 power play ops......ZERO GOALS
The Canucks had 5 power play ops....TWO GOALS

Don't know where you get the 8 on 6 crap from?  At times late in the third period it looked like 8 on 6 but that was because we were finally playing hockey.

By the way did you get a chance to check the standings?  Chicago in a three way tie with the FLAMES (LOL) and the Kings for 9th.  Av's just 2 back and a game in hand.  Tied with the Flames..........I can't stop laughing.
2/5/2011 2:43 PM
keep laughing juskay.  those flames could end up playing you in the first round and knock you out.  same goes for those hawks.  vancouver is playing amazing right now, but they haven't gotten it done in recent years when it really counts.  :>
2/5/2011 4:21 PM
The two "penalties" the refs called the Hawks for that led to those goals were laughably bad.  Not to mention the Hawks got robbed of a goal and Vancouver was allowed a goal on a play that should have been whistled offside.  That's a 4 goal swing that the refs were directly responsible for.  No matter, we're still gonna make the playoffs and win at least one round.

Also, that big shiny thing in our trophy case looks awfully sweet.  Too bad Canuck fans will never know the feeling of accomplishment and triumph us Hawks fans have been enjoying since June 9, 2010.

2/5/2011 4:27 PM
 Funny listening to  Hawks fans getting all their excuses in line for when they miss the playoffs ..
2/5/2011 10:47 PM
 Refs are against us..LOL..get your soccer moms out there hitting the refs with their purses..how pathetic..maybe make a deal at the deadline and get  Byfuglien back..after all he was the ONLY reason you beat Vancouver last year..contrary to what Godmike says ..he has a "man crush" on your team..doesnt count
2/5/2011 10:50 PM
Didn't say they were against us, just pointed out how they cost us a win and 2 points.

Too bad only nickhead had the balls to man up and take my bet.  The rest of you pansies have no room to run your mouths.
2/5/2011 11:53 PM
Posted by mudbone1969 on 2/5/2011 11:53:00 PM (view original):
Didn't say they were against us, just pointed out how they cost us a win and 2 points.

Too bad only nickhead had the balls to man up and take my bet.  The rest of you pansies have no room to run your mouths.
LUCKY YOU.........................IF we all MANNED-up, you would be a POOR MAN!!
2/6/2011 12:17 AM
 What ? you did what with Nickhead's balls?  thats off topic dude
2/6/2011 12:17 AM
I think mudbone 1969 calls his "johnson" a BET!!!

Nickhead was the only "MAN" willing to take his "johnson" (bet)

And he calls us pansies?????


lol
2/6/2011 12:27 AM
 Muddy 's bet is like saying there wont be a sunny day next year..but unfortunately for him there probably wont..lol..  who in all seriousness bets that the winner of the Stanley cup doesnt make the playoffs the following year? .. way to man up and make that risky bet
2/6/2011 12:50 AM
 I  bet Muddy's wife makes all the decisions in the household...gives him a allowance and lets him know how,when and how long they make love..and if he takes more than the allocated time to finish he misses out..
2/6/2011 12:54 AM
 Looking at the standings , Hawks look pretty good...if the top 10 made the playoffs   lol
2/6/2011 1:13 AM
LOL..........
2/6/2011 1:15 AM
◂ Prev 1...45|46|47|48|49...249 Next ▸
STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS 2009-10 Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.