Quote: Originally posted by MikeT23 on 3/17/2010That's why I said an "average" 3B would have an RF of 3ish and a 3B with 2.26 was costing his team 119+ hits a season.Plays not made by a certain position are not made by anyone. Therefore, they become hits.
I think you're taking that stat a little too far. 100+ hits in a season? That's like 50 runs with the glove.
There's so many other variables, such as whether or not the ball even gets hit to that guy. To use an example from Season 14 No Quitters:
St. Louis had a superior pitching staff to Rochester. They struck out more batters and faced fewer total. Additionally, Rochester's staff had a far higher groundball tendency. These factors combined to contribute to the Rochester 3B getting far more chances. In detail:
The ball was put into play 4613 times against St. Louis and their staff had a 1.01 groundball tendency. Assuming 3B is involved in 20% of infield plays, that would mean that the St. Louis third basemen got somewhere around of 500 chances. Thus, you might expect a range factor in the neighborhood of 500/162 or 3.1.
The ball was put into play 4831 times against Rochester and their staff had a 1.43 groundball tendency. This would mean that Rochester third basemen got somewhere around 690 chances. Thus, you might expect a range factor in the neighborhood of 690/162 or 4.2.
And no surprise,
Sean Arnold had a range factor of 3.94 compared to
3.24 for
Cliff Cohen3.46 for
Achilles BillingsleyBoth of whom are vastly superior defenders (as expected by their ratings) to Arnold, as evidenced by 24 (+) and 0 (-) plays between the two of them, compared to 4 (+) and 3 (-) for Arnold, in addition to an inferior fielding percentage.
Just using range factor, Arnold appears to be .6*162 = 90 baserunners (meaning almost 50 runs!) better than Cohen or Billingsly, when in fact, Arnold was a below average defender who probably cost his team about 3 runs compared to Cohen or Billingsly, who probably saved about 11 runs between the two of them.