You may hate Palin, but what part of that is not true?

Best Selling Author
Professor
President of Harvard Law Review
Illinois State Senator
Keynote speech at 2004 Democratic Convention
United States Senator
President

Posted by rcrusso on 7/6/2011 11:28:00 AM (view original):
The part left unsaid, that any of that qualifies her for leadership. Beauty queen? PTA? Her "husbands" business? Mayor of a town no one ever heard of before and then gov. of the least populated state in the country. Give me a break. Anyone who thinks that is a qualification for any thing but the Gov. of Alaska........oh, that's right, she walked away from that job.

It was you said  "Reality is just some unproven theory to you."

Now again, what about what swamp said in the post you are responding to is not real?  Personally, I don't think I would nominate Palin, but she has, in fact, led much more than Obama ever did before he took office.  And none of those things were handed to her.  If you're going to attack his point, attack what he actually said.

And to be clear, although I believe in most of the same principles she stands for, she would not be my choice.

Posted by rcrusso on 7/6/2011 1:58:00 PM (view original):
I made my position clear. If your job is to carry swamp's water, go ahead.

What he means is your BS only holds water if you are talking to a bunch of like minded people who know that any Conservative Female must be stupid because Conservatives hate women.

That response sounds like a joke but it isnt.

This is the belief of the left. Any women or minority who looks at the issues and decides that they suport Conservative values are considered traitors.

You see the way that Palin, Bachmann, Rice, Thomas, Steele and all the rest are treated by the left for daring to go against the Democratic party.

They knew the risks. The vicious attacks that they would suffer if they made the choice to support Conservative values.

Everyone? All the women and Minorities that happen to be Conservatives? What did Rice do. Or Thomas? Or Palin for that matter.

I want people to start to wonder if the word from the left is true, or if they are using their influence over the media to spread lies!

Bachmann and Palin represent a major threat to the left. If women support their cause as the first Female President the Left would be destroyed.

The left knows that Obama is a disaster. He can no longer run against Bush, although he wants to. Nothing he has done in his first term, with the sole exception of OBL, can be used to get people to support him. And since his beliefs of interrogation would have prevented the operation if he were President instead of Bush, even that is a meaningless victory. Obama cannot win, they need the Republicans to lose.

So the "Message" starts. All the Republicans are bad. The Tea Party is dead. Republicans are all Racists.

That is the Obama plan. Win by destroying the enemy. Turn their strengths into weakness. Destroy their reputations.

Posted by jiml60 on 6/27/2011 7:39:00 PM (view original):

This is the kind of stuff we are talking about.

She shoots from the hip. She doesnt have 12 guys look over ever word she speaks to make sure that she stays on message. She is a real person, and sometimes real people confuse heros with serial killers.

It's obvious she needs at least one.

And real people don't confuse heroes with serial killers. Ever. 

I believe neo-Nazis do. Whether they count as real people is, obviously, open to question.

Not having people do very basic research to prepare her messaging and brief her suggests Ms. Bachmann isn't prepared for prime time, which is why she is mocked by the media and shouldn't be treated as a serious candidate.

Posted by swamphawk22 on 6/28/2011 7:29:00 AM (view original):
Lets talk about what makes a gaffe important.

Palin or Bachmann makes a slip and it gets to all the news outlets. They start to add up in the minds of people and they start to think you are a "flake".

On the flip side Obama, who is the president, makes a horrible gaffe addressing soldiers about a medal of honor winner. No coverage anywhere.

Maybe Obama isnt smarter than Bachman, he is just covered up better.

Wasn't Obama the editor of the Harvard Law Review? That's not a position that is conferred on dumbasses. Just saying.

Posted by swamphawk22 on 6/30/2011 3:55:00 AM (view original):

Posted by antonsirius on 6/29/2011 7:59:00 PM (view original):
No, liar, they didn't say Palin didn't represent women.

Actually they said she doesnt represent us as Americans Women.

So from that we can assume that she feels that Palin does not represent women.

I cant believe you went through all the work of poking your head out of your hole for this!

I cannot believe your fat *** didn't snap a hammy making that leap.