Almost none. It just looks cool. Like spinning rims.

Does that mean it should be banned?

So what do you think about Mitt's permanent ban on assault rifles that he enacted in 2004 while governor of Massachusetts?

oh you mean Obamaban?

Posted by The Taint on 7/24/2012 9:08:00 AM (view original):
So what do you think about Mitt's permanent ban on assault rifles that he enacted in 2004 while governor of Massachusetts?

Mass is a state run by Dems.  That is what they want.  Good for them.  There is a reason many of them want to move north to NH.

As to 100 round magazines, is it necessary?  Probably not.  But if you really think this guy having standard magazines would have made a difference, then you know nothing about firearms.

Well you would think the gun toting conservatives would be up in arms over what Mitt did in Mass. 


So you think discharging from a one hundred round magazine is the same as discharging 12 8 shot magazines that require reloading each clip?    And it's someone else who knows nothing about firearms?  Sure man, whatever you say.

It takes all of 5 seconds re reload.  Oh, and the AR-15 jammed.  But hey, details.

Posted by jclarkbaker on 7/24/2012 11:53:00 AM (view original):
It takes all of 5 seconds re reload.  Oh, and the AR-15 jammed.  But hey, details.

Is that an official time that was measured in the heat of that kind of moment? Or just a time you're pulling out of your ***. 5 times 12 is an extra minute. Perhaps someone tackles him while reloading. To say there is no difference is ludicrous.

Posted by The Taint on 7/24/2012 1:21:00 PM (view original):

Posted by jclarkbaker on 7/24/2012 11:53:00 AM (view original):
It takes all of 5 seconds re reload.  Oh, and the AR-15 jammed.  But hey, details.

Is that an official time that was measured in the heat of that kind of moment? Or just a time you're pulling out of your ***. 5 times 12 is an extra minute. Perhaps someone tackles him while reloading. To say there is no difference is ludicrous.

Wait a minute!

You can tackle him, but it is impossible to stop him with a gun??

Posted by rcrusso on 7/24/2012 1:16:00 PM (view original):

Seems that in the past both Romney and Obama have been more influenced by the Anti-Gun forces in America than the so called "Gun lobby".

And what about Department of State Document 7277?

Posted by swamphawk22 on 7/24/2012 1:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/24/2012 1:21:00 PM (view original):

Posted by jclarkbaker on 7/24/2012 11:53:00 AM (view original):
It takes all of 5 seconds re reload.  Oh, and the AR-15 jammed.  But hey, details.

Is that an official time that was measured in the heat of that kind of moment? Or just a time you're pulling out of your ***. 5 times 12 is an extra minute. Perhaps someone tackles him while reloading. To say there is no difference is ludicrous.

Wait a minute!

You can tackle him, but it is impossible to stop him with a gun??

For the third time, you retarded ****, he was wearing body armor.

Posted by occsid on 7/24/2012 1:58:00 PM (view original):

Posted by swamphawk22 on 7/24/2012 1:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/24/2012 1:21:00 PM (view original):

Posted by jclarkbaker on 7/24/2012 11:53:00 AM (view original):
It takes all of 5 seconds re reload.  Oh, and the AR-15 jammed.  But hey, details.

Is that an official time that was measured in the heat of that kind of moment? Or just a time you're pulling out of your ***. 5 times 12 is an extra minute. Perhaps someone tackles him while reloading. To say there is no difference is ludicrous.

Wait a minute!

You can tackle him, but it is impossible to stop him with a gun??

For the third time, you retarded ****, he was wearing body armor.

This isnt Dungeons and Dragons where you say something is immune to missile weapons and it is true.

Bullet can stun or disable people with body armor, and even penetrate it in the right situation.

But I am glad you can tackle a man with 4 guns wearing body armor.

Posted by The Taint on 7/24/2012 1:21:00 PM (view original):

Posted by jclarkbaker on 7/24/2012 11:53:00 AM (view original):
It takes all of 5 seconds re reload.  Oh, and the AR-15 jammed.  But hey, details.

Is that an official time that was measured in the heat of that kind of moment? Or just a time you're pulling out of your ***. 5 times 12 is an extra minute. Perhaps someone tackles him while reloading. To say there is no difference is ludicrous.

"Heat of the moment".  Because you are going to be very nervous when you are shooting at a theater full of unarmed people and you're wearing body armor.

12 rounds?  Are you serious.  Most sidearms have more rounds per mag.

There is a difference.  A very slight one.  But you're right.  In your fantasy world of a panic stricken theater, "perhaps someone tackles him."

I hear the company who owns the theater has designated all their theaters "no gun zones".  Works well.