The evidence suggests what I claim.
1. You scream "That's the most RACIST!!!! piece of **** law on the books!!!!"
2. I ask "What part?"
3. You turtle up.
4. I suggest you never bothered to read the law.
5. You continue as a turtle.
6. I hammer you for 3-4 pages.
7. You complain to ADMIN.
8. The thread disappears.
9. I get a warning.

Posted by bad_luck on 10/7/2016 12:07:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 10/7/2016 11:53:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 10/7/2016 11:33:00 AM (view original):
**** off, liar.

You've provided zero proof. Your story is made up. That's clear from the fact that you haven't posted the warning you got.

So your position is that Mike is not to be believed because he refuses to post something, but you should be believed despite your refusal to post something?

Are you special?

A) I did post something.

B) Mike's the one that made the accusation.

It it looks like Mike's the one that thinks he's special. But I do love it when you ride in on your horse to defend him.

You posted a fragment of something, without the surrounding context.

As a piece of "evidence", it's pretty worthless.

And I'm not defending him. I'm questioning you.

Posted by tecwrg on 10/7/2016 12:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 10/7/2016 12:07:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 10/7/2016 11:53:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 10/7/2016 11:33:00 AM (view original):
**** off, liar.

You've provided zero proof. Your story is made up. That's clear from the fact that you haven't posted the warning you got.

So your position is that Mike is not to be believed because he refuses to post something, but you should be believed despite your refusal to post something?

Are you special?

A) I did post something.

B) Mike's the one that made the accusation.

It it looks like Mike's the one that thinks he's special. But I do love it when you ride in on your horse to defend him.

You posted a fragment of something, without the surrounding context.

As a piece of "evidence", it's pretty worthless.

And I'm not defending him. I'm questioning you.

I posted the answer from admin saying they didn't warn mike. Maybe that's not good enough for you, but mike has posted nothing and continues to insist that I post more evidence.

Which is weird behavior for someone who claims to have evidence in his possession that would completely discredit my claim.

You started posting "evidence". I never posted anything. I'm consistent in my behavior. You are not. Why?

Finally. The full screen. Seems to back up PSBL.

BTW - Tec has a horse? Where's my fuck1ng horse???

Posted by sjpoker on 10/7/2016 1:02:00 PM (view original):
Finally. The full screen. Seems to back up PSBL.

BTW - Tec has a horse? Where's my fuck1ng horse???

I don't have a horse. But a horse once escaped from the horse farm just down the road from my house and trotted through my back yard.

So there you have it. BL used his alias to complain about me. Figured as much.

Posted by MikeT23 on 10/7/2016 1:23:00 PM (view original):
So there you have it. BL used his alias to complain about me. Figured as much.

Jrd_x.

Posted by tecwrg on 10/7/2016 1:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 10/7/2016 1:23:00 PM (view original):
So there you have it. BL used his alias to complain about me. Figured as much.

Jrd_x.

Yep.

Posted by bad_luck on 10/7/2016 1:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 10/7/2016 1:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 10/7/2016 1:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 10/7/2016 1:23:00 PM (view original):
So there you have it. BL used his alias to complain about me. Figured as much.

Jrd_x.

Yep.

Admit that you lied about the warning from admin.

Admit that you complained with your alias.