Posted by topdogggbm on 4/14/2020 9:42:00 AM (view original):
Posted by gillispie1 on 4/13/2020 11:00:00 AM (view original):
Posted by topdogggbm on 4/12/2020 8:18:00 AM (view original):
Snewell12 earns championship #25! Congrats! Only 7 coaches have accomplished that
it would be cool to get the handful of multiple IDs merged who are in that range to get a real count on that number, i don't know if the real number is 8 or 12 but its a pretty big variation on a % basis. also would be nice if OR's total was accurate as he's #1. i could help with some of the lining up, but its getting hazier as the years go by, who is who...
I agree. But I think there's less people than you seem to think it is that have multiple IDs with massive titles. I can only think of 2 myself.... FW_Kekionga/The_Kid. And then the0nlyis/viva_il_re. I'm sure there's a couple more. But I don't think there's a ton
thats why i think its worth fixing - its only about 5-10 merges that need to happen to get the important ones that affect the top of the rankings. off the top of my head, for example, that 25 title post - i know emy and acn were both REALLY close to that figure before they retired. more? less? i don't know - i know they are both are least 20. plus, those guys accumulated many of those 20 back in the old days when worlds were fuller and titles, and stats like 10+ and 20+ titles were much harder to come by. the fact that you don't know those guys are in that range, you, the keeper of the title board - shows why its so important to get it fixed!
other than those 2, OR is missing his ryan75 and hes #1, i am over 30 (barely, i think - might be 30 even) without co-coaching titles (which i think we all agree should be left out), and i would wager at least 1 more in the top 10 has titles under another ID. so that's like half the top 10, or at least 4 of the top dozen or so at a minimum. so i think its statistically relevant!
there's another 5 or so in the 10+ range that are probably worth trying to adjust, and i think it would be done. multiple IDs are just about dead now, now that we are so far removed from 1.0 (before potential, when most people considered multiple IDs fine) and when there weren't as many worlds and stuff. so i think the upkeep is really minimal, its just a little up-front aggregating... i can definitely help flush that out, if you are up for it!