Posted by MikeT23 on 4/23/2012 9:01:00 AM (view original):
I've always thought that to be the case but it doesn't necessarily look to be true. Someone brought it to my attention when I stated as much and, quite frankly, I find it hard to dispute that glove plays at least as much a part of PB as range. You can check the leaderboard, filter passed balls in most any league and find that PB/range-glove are all over the place. The guy with the 10/19 R/G is just as likely to have as many PB as the 5/31. Of course, the sample sizes are small and the 5/12 difference isn't that much. Moonlight Graham's all-time PB leaders
RG PB/Inning
12/19 64
6/23 57
5/21 91
8/22 100
11/22 77
As you can see, the higher range guys were worse than than all but the 6/23 guy. It's just all over the place, IMO.
Should that read "Inning/PB"? 100 PB/Inning would have a significant impact on a game...
Also, I've noticed (so it would be anectdotal, no stats behind it) that it seems clear that ranges at the low extreme (0,1,2) have significantly more passed balls than anyone, regardless of glove... I can't think of a C that I've noticed with an extreme-low glove, though; can you?