You DO realize the only reason I'm giving you **** is because, and I can't recall which thread, you asked "What's your point?" when I updated something.

I don't care about your silly poll, that proves there is no clear consensus among voters, I was just turning the table on you.

I have no idea what % of the population needs to respond for an accurate assessment. I know that Trump became POTUS when virtually EVERY poll predicated Hillary in a landslide. So a higher percentage than those polls, I guess.

Hillary won the popular vote.

Good point. What's she doing these days?

LANDSLIDE victory was predicted. Right?

"I was just turning the table on you."

AHHHHHHHHH YOU GOT MEEEEE

Here's my point.

Typically once you have collected some data on a subject/test, you attempt to interpret the results. Otherwise, what's the point (right Mike)?

So, it'd be interesting to hear people's thoughts on what this data means.

Here's an interpretation of the data supplied by TJ

- This shows that 66% of users don't have a problem with two recruiting sessions and no action required.

Here's another one

- This shows that just as many people dislike something as people who actually like it. Might need to dig deeper on this one to understand why.

Another one could be

- All the people who were REALLY against the change have already left. Only having 33% of people like this major feature of the change isn't very high. It doesn't offset the number of customers who were lost.

Or

- 33% of people liking a change is pretty much par for the course for WIS games so we have definitely met our goal and success criteria.

Or

- just has many people like 1 session as 2 sessions. Why was so much time and money invested into making this change?

Or finally MikeT's interpretation

- I can't tell anything. Except that Benis is a boner.

Posted by Benis on 2/10/2018 11:50:00 AM (view original):
Here's my point.

Typically once you have collected some data on a subject/test, you attempt to interpret the results. Otherwise, what's the point (right Mike)?

So, it'd be interesting to hear people's thoughts on what this data means.

Sure. Your data suggest that an equal number of people like it, dislike it or don't care one way or the other.

Interesting poll. You nailed it, bro!!!

Posted by MikeT23 on 2/10/2018 12:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Benis on 2/10/2018 11:50:00 AM (view original):
Here's my point.

Typically once you have collected some data on a subject/test, you attempt to interpret the results. Otherwise, what's the point (right Mike)?

So, it'd be interesting to hear people's thoughts on what this data means.

Sure. Your data suggest that an equal number of people like it, dislike it or don't care one way or the other.

Interesting poll. You nailed it, bro!!!

I get that you're a trucker and this type of thinking is new to you. That's okay.

Posted by Benis on 2/10/2018 12:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 2/10/2018 12:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Benis on 2/10/2018 11:50:00 AM (view original):
Here's my point.

Typically once you have collected some data on a subject/test, you attempt to interpret the results. Otherwise, what's the point (right Mike)?

So, it'd be interesting to hear people's thoughts on what this data means.

Sure. Your data suggest that an equal number of people like it, dislike it or don't care one way or the other.

Interesting poll. You nailed it, bro!!!

I get that you're a trucker and this type of thinking is new to you. That's okay.

Actually, maybe this could help.

In your trucking business, you offer a new feature to your customers. It costs you a little more overhead but based upon what you've heard from your customers, it seems like a good idea.

After a year, you ask your customers how they like the new feature. It's an even split between customers who like it, dislike and who don't care.

Do you just say - well that's inconclusive. Guess we'll continue on with this new feature that costs us more money. La de da.

Bro, I'm telling you that your poll gave us valuable insight. Don't be such a crumudgeon when I'm complimenting you on your irreplaceable contributions to our small internet society!!!!

Posted by Benis on 2/10/2018 12:06:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Benis on 2/10/2018 12:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 2/10/2018 12:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Benis on 2/10/2018 11:50:00 AM (view original):
Here's my point.

Typically once you have collected some data on a subject/test, you attempt to interpret the results. Otherwise, what's the point (right Mike)?

So, it'd be interesting to hear people's thoughts on what this data means.

Sure. Your data suggest that an equal number of people like it, dislike it or don't care one way or the other.

Interesting poll. You nailed it, bro!!!

I get that you're a trucker and this type of thinking is new to you. That's okay.

Actually, maybe this could help.

In your trucking business, you offer a new feature to your customers. It costs you a little more overhead but based upon what you've heard from your customers, it seems like a good idea.

After a year, you ask your customers how they like the new feature. It's an even split between customers who like it, dislike and who don't care.

Do you just say - well that's inconclusive. Guess we'll continue on with this new feature that costs us more money. La de da.

Does it cost WIfS money to do nothing with this feature? How so?

Posted by Benis on 2/10/2018 11:51:00 AM (view original):
Here's an interpretation of the data supplied by TJ

- This shows that 66% of users don't have a problem with two recruiting sessions and no action required.

Here's another one

- This shows that just as many people dislike something as people who actually like it. Might need to dig deeper on this one to understand why.

Nope, as I explained to you before, you screwed up the design - likely on purpose - so you don’t know how many feel positively, but not strongly positive about the change. Invalid interpretation.