Rittenhouse may very well get off, but it won’t be because of his testimony. Woof.

it will be because he had a witness

meaning video replay

shows a rifle got pointed at by a pistol, a rifle got hit by a skateboard, and a rifle got wrestled by a hand

you look at the arbery shooting, same idea

in close proximity threats were made or attacks were perceived

then a guy with a gun pulled a trigger



if we rid us of the 2nd amendment

picture all the actors with knives

not sure the result would be any different

Posted by laramiebob on 11/10/2021 9:57:00 AM (view original):
That's true. But it doesn't mean I have to like them. Hierarchies are a means of holding individuals down. I don't LIKE that!

Depends on the hierarchy.

Posted by Uofa2 on 11/10/2021 7:57:00 PM (view original):
Rittenhouse may very well get off, but it won’t be because of his testimony. Woof.

Yeah. I wanted to answer the questions for him. He’s not the brightest bulb. The ADA wasn’t asking particularly difficult questions and the ADA contradicted himself a number of times.

What's the odds on Rittenhouse running for office as a Republican sometime in his life?

He's definitely going to speak at the 2024 RNC and other related events

Posted by strikeout26 on 11/11/2021 4:53:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Uofa2 on 11/10/2021 7:57:00 PM (view original):
Rittenhouse may very well get off, but it won’t be because of his testimony. Woof.

Yeah. I wanted to answer the questions for him. He’s not the brightest bulb. The ADA wasn’t asking particularly difficult questions and the ADA contradicted himself a number of times.

I got quite the opposite impression. He was well spoken and was very adept at being evasive or standing his ground.
He didn’t come across as a dummy to me and he is only 18 years old.

Posted by strikeout26 on 11/11/2021 4:53:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Uofa2 on 11/10/2021 7:57:00 PM (view original):
Rittenhouse may very well get off, but it won’t be because of his testimony. Woof.

Yeah. I wanted to answer the questions for him. He’s not the brightest bulb. The ADA wasn’t asking particularly difficult questions and the ADA contradicted himself a number of times.

I got quite the opposite impression. He was well spoken and was very adept at being evasive or standing his ground.
He didn’t come across as a dummy to me and he is only 18 years old.

You would not believe how many folks out there believe Rittenhouse killed black folks.

That's outstanding work by the MSM.

I'm confused.

My understanding, from my conservative friends, is that the mainstream media:

1) wants to vilify Rittenhouse
2) thinks nobody cares if you kill black people

So why would they try to convince people that he killed black people (which allegedly the MSM believes nobody cares about) and not white people (which, frankly, everyone cares about).

Confusion reigns!

It's the new way of things.

Reality isn't.
It's all about the virtual.
The alternative facts.
You know, the ones that fit your bias/box/tribe.

Posted by Vitamin_C on 11/13/2021 9:03:00 AM (view original):
You would not believe how many folks out there believe Rittenhouse killed black folks.

That's outstanding work by the MSM.

Link one article from a MSM source (just one) claiming or insinuating that Rittenhouse killed black people.

Fair that. Good call Tangy.

It’s more the fact that MSM has made this a racial issue just like they do with everything. It’s quite deceiving to the normal person that only reads headlines. I could link you dozens of articles that do that.

I don't understand the stance that it's not related to racial issues. The dude showed up to a BLM rally with a weapon that's really only useful for killing human beings. Even if he was hoping to go home without discharging said weapon, his intent was not peaceful towards BLM protesters. That doesn't make it murder. It does make the racial undertones unavoidable.