Tea Party 4-18-11 Topic

Quote: Originally Posted By creilmann on 4/18/2010
Quote: Originally posted by swamphawk22 on 4/17/2010
It still interests me that no one is willing to have a discussion about cutting spending.

In response to opposition to the Stimulus bill, Dems mentioned that this was a crisis. That we were in a situation as bad as the great depression.

So if this is a crisis lets try something radical. Lets cut spending. 20% across the board. Lets see if we can get the private sector to believe that we will not take their profits and have them put people to work.

You're so full of s**t. I've asked you dozens of times to explain your spending cuts mantra and you reply with the exact same 20% garbage. Then when I ask you if you know the consequences of such cuts would be you move along. Don't act like we've been ignoring you on this
There it is.

We can discuss raising taxes, or adding to the debt, that isnt a problem.

We need to eliminate all that isnt important. This is no longer a theoretical discussion about states rights, we cannot maintain the level of government we are at!
4/19/2010 1:22 AM
Quote: Originally posted by swamphawk22 on 4/19/2010Let me get this straight. Company gets inspected, fails, 8 years later something happens?? This is the problem. EVERYTHING in the world is now the problem of the Federal Government. It is impossible for us to maintain the level of government we have. Impossible. We cannot tax more or borrow more. The only solution is to eliminate some of the crazy run away spending.  

You completely missed the point, or more likely, slanted it to fit your argument. If a restaurant in Warren, MI gets a visit by the health inspector and violations are found, the restaurant is given a small window of time to correct those violations. A follow-up inspection is made and if they don't pass, they get shut down. If they do pass, they usually get another inspection within a year. Even if the restaurant has a perfect history of inspections, there still wouldn't be an eight year period between inspections.

Violations were found at the Georgia plant and nothing was done about it until the Salmonella outbreak eight years later. In the court reports, witnesses (company employees) reported that many previous shipments over that eight years were found to have possible Salmonella contamination but were shipped anyway. Had the FDA been able to properly follow up, this could have been nipped in the bud before people became sick and died.

Try again.
4/19/2010 9:58 AM
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
4/19/2010 10:01 AM
LETS INVADE ISRAEL

PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKE

THEY HAVE A NUTJOB LEADER, WMD'S, AND KILL THEIR NEIGHBOURS
4/19/2010 10:45 AM
The 20% across the board is a threat if Congress cannot make stratgic cuts. Kind of a worst possible option.

Some ideas.

Eliminate Dept of Energy and Education. Return Energy to interior and cut budget by 50%. Return Education to HHS and cut budget by 85%.

eliminate the branchs of the Military. Create a military only panel that decides what weapons are needed and not needed within the budget. Civilians tell them the amount of money, soldiers tell you how to spend it.

just the start.
4/19/2010 10:50 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By swamphawk22 on 4/19/2010
eliminate the branchs of the Military.





It is obvious you have never been a member of the service and also have not clue one how the brotherhood of arms works. Not ever in military history has anyone ever considered this a possibility. This could never happen,ever, EVER! Now I know you have never had an original idea of your own so I am curious about what "comic book" gave you this STUPID idea?
4/19/2010 10:59 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By rcrusso on 4/19/2010
Quote: Originally Posted By swamphawk22 on 4/19/2010

eliminate the branchs of the Military.






It is obvious you have never been a member of the service and also have not clue one how the brotherhood of arms works. Not ever in military history has anyone ever considered this a possibility. This could never happen,ever, EVER! Now I know you have never had an original idea of your own so I am curious about what "comic book" gave you this STUPID idea?

When were the branches created? Werent they all divisions of the army a few years ago? If so, have we been more or less effective? I have no idea. Just curious.
4/19/2010 1:06 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By mykids_31206 on 4/19/2010
Quote: Originally Posted By rcrusso on 4/19/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By swamphawk22 on 4/19/2010

eliminate the branchs of the Military.






It is obvious you have never been a member of the service and also have not clue one how the brotherhood of arms works. Not ever in military history has anyone ever considered this a possibility. This could never happen,ever, EVER! Now I know you have never had an original idea of your own so I am curious about what "comic book" gave you this STUPID idea?

When were the branches created? Werent they all divisions of the army a few years ago? If so, have we been more or less effective? I have no idea. Just curious
Navy and Army date back to the begging of the country.

Air Force was Army Air Corp, till after WWII.

Marines are a branch of the Navy, but have some autonomy.
4/19/2010 1:14 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By rcrusso on 4/19/2010
Quote: Originally Posted By swamphawk22 on 4/19/2010

eliminate the branchs of the Military.






It is obvious you have never been a member of the service and also have not clue one how the brotherhood of arms works. Not ever in military history has anyone ever considered this a possibility. This could never happen,ever, EVER! Now I know you have never had an original idea of your own so I am curious about what "comic book" gave you this STUPID idea?

I wrote about the idea of no branchs in 1981 while a junior in High School. I came upon the idea when I read an analysis of D-Day. The Germans had shore batteries ran by the Navy, Flack and ground units ran by the Air Force, SS and Whermacht ground units. This caused confusion. I realize that there was more at work in their situation than ours, but if it is costing anything why do we have branchs?

I realize that military people oppose this. Why?

I see waste based on inter-branch feuding. Instead of having 1 Special Forces, we have multiple led by multiple branchs. We have Air Units flown by all branchs. We have ground units commanded by multiple branchs.

4/19/2010 1:20 PM
Name one human with an IQ in excess of 12 that thinks this is a good idea.
4/19/2010 1:48 PM
I asked my cardiologist to take a look at my wisdom tooth the other day and he told me to go to the dentist. Darn, here I thought I was living in swamps perfect world!
4/19/2010 1:55 PM
Hey A-hole! Any room for the Coast Guard in your brave new world? After all they operate within the boarders of the United States and that is against the law .....ahh......thats right, that was overturned by the Bush administration.



never mind
4/19/2010 2:17 PM
If you give me one service, I will let you overturn Patriot and any misc things Bush did to protect us.
4/19/2010 2:25 PM
Give you? You stupid pri-K! You have NOTHING to say about it or anything else that matters. Patriot act was just an excuse to provide profit opportunities for the Bush/Chains cabal. It is idiots like you that allow crap like this to take place.
4/19/2010 2:30 PM
So if this was a Bush Cabal thing (and by the way, doesnt that response seem nuts?) Why hasnt Obama ended it?
4/19/2010 2:32 PM
◂ Prev 1...5|6|7|8|9...133 Next ▸
Tea Party 4-18-11 Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.