I would tend to agree that a lot of the time Colonels goes too far and argues for the sake of arguing. But.......the guy does have some valid points and GOOD arguments sometimes and I'm starting to think that people tend to overlook those, focus only on the negatives (and there are lots of them), see who posted the comment and automatically go into bash Colonels mode.
Can he be an ***? Gigantic yes for that one. Does he argue most of the time just for the sake of arguing? I believe so. Is he stubborn and set in his ways? No question. However, it's obvious that the guy is intelligent, you can tell from the posts he has written. Does he make some valid points? Absolutely, they just seem to get lost in the bash Colonels reaction.
I know Colonels can come off as abrasive, or an ***, or whatever you want to call him. But, just because everyone seems to dislike him doesn't mean that his arguments/stances are automatically wrong. I'm actually finding myself agreeing with him more and more. I think if everyone would actually take the time to read and understand what his arguments/replies are instead of automatically bashing hin, they'd see that the guy really has some good points.
And on that note, I can't believe that I'm actually defending Colonels in a public forum. I must have lost my freakin mind! Or it could be the painkillers I'm on right now. If that turns out to be the case, that it was the painkillers, then all bets are off and everyone can disregard the whole post because it was made under the influence!!! :^) Seriously, the guy does make good arguments/posts now and then. He comes off as arrogant, but I've accepted the fact that that's just how he is. Still doesn't have any effect on his posts. Read them, and I mean actually READ them, and you'll see some very good ideas, responses, arguments. They just come out in the wrong way that's all, doesn't detract from the validity of the posts.
And I am really under the influence of painkillers right now (leg issues).