Posted by a_in_the_b on 6/21/2010 11:28:00 AM (view original):
No, COlonels. Blocking you is a perfectly rational capitalist decision about how he wants to spend his resources: Not reading you. How the heck is this related to any economic situation. If you receive mail from someone you don't like, and chose not to open it, are you 'being a socialist'?
Dude, socialism and Communism aren't only in reference to economics, but ways of life as well. You do realize that Communist nations censor what people can and cannot read, correct? They determine what content is suitable for their people or not. Its kind of the same propagandized principle here...you're not only controlling what you do or do not read, you're controlling WHAT YOU SEE AND WHAT YOU DON'T SEE...which is even more bizarre. I mean, when if you read a newspaper, and there's a column(ist) that you don't like, do you tear it out of your newspaper, or do you just choose not to read it? Right....same concept here...if you don't like certain people's comments/opinions, then IGNORE THEM...blocking is completely unnecessary if you have the least bit of self control. Blocking people is incredibly weak, and again, its basically an admittance that you can't hang with said person, and dalter can say whatever the hell he wants really, but its true. The person you like least on this board could always have that 1 post that wows you, but you'll never see it because you've exercised your board right to be a Communist...clever. Hell aintheb, you've even agreed with me in certain instances.
And btw, choosing not to open snail mail and sending them a letter back telling them to block mail to your box from x sender are 2 completely different instances/concepts...just saying.
Peace.