i agree with most of that, except the notion implied from " Do you think the sportsbooks being advertised on NFL game tv broadcasts would tolerate anything that would cloud their perceived integrity?:"
100% of sportsbook websites have significant vulnerabilities, too. daily fantasy, online sports betting, online poker, online casinos, have all had countless cheating scandals and certainly are vulnerable to manipulation. throw online stock trading in there too. the only thing impressive in all of this is that that consortium of low-integrity operations have convinced so many people that they have integrity in the first place.
all these big gambling sites you talk about, their response to cheating scandals has been absolutely garbage. your post like... it is so far off in suggesting that big gambling websites don't have these problems and that if they did, they would handle it well, they would operate with integrity. i'm not trying to be a dick, but to me this shows complete ignorance of the countless scandals that have occurred in that exact space. which is normal - most folks have no idea how pervasive these issues are. one example, not too long ago it came out that a bunch of cheaters on a number of major poker websites (ultimatebet, absolute poker) could see the cards of their opponents. impacted players lost tens of millions. did those websites fully reimburse those impacted by cheating? of course not! now granted, tons of users left over it, and rightfully so, but it went on for many years before that happened.
none of this absolves CS of the responsibility to handle the issue with integrity. and none of this has anything to do with the cheater in this thread, F that guy, this is not a defense of him. or of CS. but context does matter, and the general internet community, along with the general gambling community, kind of wander around in this blissful ignorance of how screwed up the entire system is. so then they get overly outraged and overly surprised when stuff happens that is literally happening on a continuous basis and is frankly inevitable. it should be more of a 'here we go again, let's apply steady pressure to make sure CS handles this one reasonably', more than a 'holy **** i can't believe this happened!'. it was guaranteed to happen, a matter of when, not if.
10/30/2022 1:57 PM (edited)