Canucks Thread - We Still Believe Topic

Jesus...how many rye and Cokes deep are you?
5/9/2010 10:47 PM
I don't get it.
5/9/2010 10:54 PM
I don't see it???????

5/9/2010 10:57 PM
Good news Nickhead ..you and your drag queen pals can get the lip gloss on again ..patrick,chris and john are coming back to town for game 6..let the **** flow! here's to hoping the refs dont let the oppostion back into the game ...your only CHANCE!!
5/9/2010 11:11 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By banned_muddy on 5/09/2010I'll be nice when I'm getting my advancing-to-the-conference-finals knobber. I won't even grab his ears or anything
You will have to wait until Tuesday.....To get your "knobber" You people need to realize...."It takes 4(FOUR) games to win a series....It ain't over until the Chicago Hot Dog.............To be continued......lol
5/9/2010 11:21 PM
Wow this got out of hand...What the hell is wrong with you guys?

As I've said before....7 games...although I really, really hope it's 6.

Great showing by Lu tonight, although Chicago didn't quite get the traffic they did in games 3 and 4.

Was it just me or was the refereeing simply atrocious tonight? The missed slash on Daniel, the missed trip on Bolland, the missed trip on Toews...and then they call a couple of love taps on Byfuglien on Burrows and I believe it was Daniel on Toews. Simply disgusting.

And Byfuglien's stick cutting O'Brien was not penalty because a shot follow through is not a high stick. Check the rules.

Either way though, the refs lost control of this one and players had no idea what was a penalty and what wasn't tonight. It looked like the Montreal Pittsburgh series out there.

Just to be clear, this is a general opinion on the officiating and in no way am I saying that it is the reason the Hawks lost.
5/9/2010 11:35 PM
The refs were bad for both sides. The ice was also bad with tons of bouncing pucks. Bottom line is that the Hawks made the game easy for Roberta. I don't think he had to make more than 4 or 5 good saves. Everything else was right into his gut.
5/9/2010 11:40 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By andru2797 on 5/09/2010
Wow this got out of hand...What the hell is wrong with you guys?

As I've said before....7 games...although I really, really hope it's 6.

Great showing by Lu tonight, although Chicago didn't quite get the traffic they did in games 3 and 4.

Was it just me or was the refereeing simply atrocious tonight? The missed slash on Daniel, the missed trip on Bolland, the missed trip on Toews...and then they call a couple of love taps on Byfuglien on Burrows and I believe it was Daniel on Toews. Simply disgusting.

And Byfuglien's stick cutting O'Brien was not penalty because a shot follow through is not a high stick. Check the rules.

Either way though, the refs lost control of this one and players had no idea what was a penalty and what wasn't tonight. It looked like the Montreal Pittsburgh series out there.

Just to be clear, this is a general opinion on the officiating and in no way am I saying that it is the reason the Hawks lost.
Official rules: ANY CONTACT made by a stick on an opponent ABOVE the shoulders is prohibited and a minor penalty shall be imposed.
5/9/2010 11:47 PM
Please take the time to learn the rules more carefully juskay...

60.1 High-sticking - A “high stick” is one which is carried above the height of the opponent’s shoulders. Players and goalkeepers must be in control and responsible for their stick. However, a player or goalkeeper is permitted accidental contact on an opponent if the act is committed as a normal windup or follow through of a shooting motion. A wild swing at a bouncing puck would not be considered a normal windup or follow through and any contact to an opponent above the height of the shoulders shall be penalized accordingly.

Here s the link in case there is any doubt.
5/9/2010 11:53 PM
Stop being a hypocrite randle. If you're going to complain about Byfuglien interfering with Luongo all series, then don't blame Luongo for complaining about the same thing.

For what it's worth, I believe the refs blew the call on the goal where he pushed Luongo into the net. Other than that, show me one clear goaltender interference penalty that wasn't called.
5/10/2010 12:03 AM
No pp for Chicago in game 6 and we head back for game 7..hopefully you get a Blackhawk lover as a ref..just like the Kings..turn it into a special teams affair to hopefully win..5 on 5 we kick your pathetic ***** over and over again
5/10/2010 12:38 AM
Yup. You're so right randle. you have outscored us by 29 goals thus far 5 on 5. I must have read the scores wrong.
5/10/2010 1:20 AM
I'm now a Canucks fan for Game Six. Not because I give a rat's *** about either team, but because I want this series to go the full seven games... preferably with injuries like the Houston/Tokyo match.
5/10/2010 1:47 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By andru2797 on 5/10/2010Yup. You're so right randle. you have outscored us by 29 goals thus far 5 on 5. I must have read the scores wrong
even you Andru would have to admit ..that if there were no penalties called in this series that Vancouver would be ahead or do you have the blinders on?
5/10/2010 2:32 AM
The above is about the stupidest statement made in the hockey forums.

"If". Kiss my ***. Hawks are a better, smarter and deeper team. Period.
5/10/2010 8:54 AM
◂ Prev 1...69|70|71|72|73...213 Next ▸
Canucks Thread - We Still Believe Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.