Canucks Thread - We Still Believe Topic

Quote: Originally Posted By nickhead on 5/12/2010
Quote: Originally Posted By raucous on 5/12/2010

The Canucks put too much faith in Luongo. The defense can be aggressive offensively, but they were standing around way too much defensively. One of the goals, the defense was on a Sunday skate, with wind blowing through their beards.

And never trust Luongo... always mails it in with big games.

Unless its for the gold meda
...and you are surrounded by great defense.
5/12/2010 6:27 PM
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
5/12/2010 6:41 PM
tough to lose to the hawks again. especially after that total domination of game one. i think having willie mitchell in the lineup could have made a huge difference. having one of your top d-men out of the lineup can really hurt. and i still think the GM should have tried to replace him at the trade deadline. i guess he thought you were "good enough" without him. or maybe there just wasn't anyone available for a reasonable price. hard to know. and you might want to start looking for a new coach. better luck next year 'nucks fans.
5/12/2010 7:01 PM
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
5/12/2010 7:09 PM
I can't see Bieksa as a top 2 defenseman on a championship-level team. Top 4, sure. No shame in that, but he ain't a Keith or Seabrook.
5/12/2010 7:09 PM
Forwards signed for next season:

Sedin Sedin Samuelsson

Burrows Kessler Bernier

Hordichuk Rypien Grabner

Hodgson!

Restricted Free agents who will be resigned with a pay raise:

Raymond Hansen and possibly Tanner Glass?

D-men signed for next season:

Bieksa Salo

Edler Ehrhoff (Baumgartner, Alberts are signed god help us if either makes the team)

RFA's who will be re-signed:

O'Brien and Rome

Goal Luongo signed and Cory Schneider RFA

Let's assume that our RFA's get a pay raise that collectively total's 4 million? That will leave the Canuck's aprox. 7 million to spend on free agents.

We need at least 2 quality D-men and 7 million may not be enough cap room to get 2 defencemen, unless we find a team dumping salary, which is how we got Ehrhoff last season.

The above group of players is essentially the same team Minus some depth forwards. We better hope we can sign 2 D-men and a couple of cheap forwards or next season will be shorter than this season as the play-offs may be a stretch......July 1st 2010 Gillis better get us some D-men.

There is alway's plan B. (Randle will like)

Trade Luongo for a sack of pucks and use his 10 million cap hit (new cap space 17 million) to get Cory Schneider 2 stud defencemen and a first line forward........Assuming you can find a taker for Luongo..
5/12/2010 7:32 PM
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
5/12/2010 9:44 PM
This bandwagoneer is going to do some gloating:

5/12/2010 11:08 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By juskay on 5/12/2010
Forwards signed for next season:

Sedin Sedin Samuelsson

Burrows Kessler Bernier

Hordichuk Rypien Grabner

Hodgson!

Restricted Free agents who will be resigned with a pay raise:

Raymond Hansen and possibly Tanner Glass?

D-men signed for next season:

Bieksa Salo

Edler Ehrhoff (Baumgartner, Alberts are signed god help us if either makes the team)

RFA's who will be re-signed:

O'Brien and Rome

Goal Luongo signed and Cory Schneider RFA

Let's assume that our RFA's get a pay raise that collectively total's 4 million? That will leave the Canuck's aprox. 7 million to spend on free agents.

We need at least 2 quality D-men and 7 million may not be enough cap room to get 2 defencemen, unless we find a team dumping salary, which is how we got Ehrhoff last season.

The above group of players is essentially the same team Minus some depth forwards. We better hope we can sign 2 D-men and a couple of cheap forwards or next season will be shorter than this season as the play-offs may be a stretch......July 1st 2010 Gillis better get us some D-men.

There is alway's plan B. (Randle will like)

Trade Luongo for a sack of pucks and use his 10 million cap hit (new cap space 17 million) to get Cory Schneider 2 stud defencemen and a first line forward........Assuming you can find a taker for Luongo..

I think we will see more changes than listed.

NO change in goal though, Luongo has a no trade clause, and is a 5.3 mil cap hit per year for the next decade. He aint going unless he tells the club he wants to.

Biggest needs are a number 1 and number 2 D man. As wll we need an upgrade somewhere at forward, either a solid 2nd line calibre player, or 2 solid third line players who can penalty kill.

Personally, I think Bieksa and O`Brien should go. Yes they are tough in the regular season, but cost us games in the playoffs. They are 5-6 d-men at best and their salary is too much for that. Alberts stays because his cap hit is low enough for a 6-7 D man. Salo`s salary is also too high for what he brings so shuold go. Most of the forwards are at reasonable cap hits for their skill level. I see one of the small fast forwards being traded for a D man upgrade. Raymond may become too expensive to keep and we have 3 or 4 clones of him waiting in the wings
5/12/2010 11:31 PM
I think before any trades or signings, the biggest move the Canucks should make is to name a real captain, like Henrik or Kesler.
5/12/2010 11:46 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By paul71 on 5/12/2010
Quote: Originally Posted By juskay on 5/12/2010

Forwards signed for next season:

Sedin Sedin Samuelsson

Burrows Kessler Bernier

Hordichuk Rypien Grabner

Hodgson!

Restricted Free agents who will be resigned with a pay raise:

Raymond Hansen and possibly Tanner Glass?

D-men signed for next season:

Bieksa Salo

Edler Ehrhoff (Baumgartner, Alberts are signed god help us if either makes the team)

RFA's who will be re-signed:

O'Brien and Rome

Goal Luongo signed and Cory Schneider RFA

Let's assume that our RFA's get a pay raise that collectively total's 4 million? That will leave the Canuck's aprox. 7 million to spend on free agents.

We need at least 2 quality D-men and 7 million may not be enough cap room to get 2 defencemen, unless we find a team dumping salary, which is how we got Ehrhoff last season.

The above group of players is essentially the same team Minus some depth forwards. We better hope we can sign 2 D-men and a couple of cheap forwards or next season will be shorter than this season as the play-offs may be a stretch......July 1st 2010 Gillis better get us some D-men.

There is alway's plan B. (Randle will like)

Trade Luongo for a sack of pucks and use his 10 million cap hit (new cap space 17 million) to get Cory Schneider 2 stud defencemen and a first line forward........Assuming you can find a taker for Luongo..

I think we will see more changes than listed.

NO change in goal though, Luongo has a no trade clause, and is a 5.3 mil cap hit per year for the next decade. He aint going unless he tells the club he wants to.

Biggest needs are a number 1 and number 2 D man. As wll we need an upgrade somewhere at forward, either a solid 2nd line calibre player, or 2 solid third line players who can penalty kill.

Personally, I think Bieksa and O`Brien should go. Yes they are tough in the regular season, but cost us games in the playoffs. They are 5-6 d-men at best and their salary is too much for that. Alberts stays because his cap hit is low enough for a 6-7 D man. Salo`s salary is also too high for what he brings so shuold go. Most of the forwards are at reasonable cap hits for their skill level. I see one of the small fast forwards being traded for a D man upgrade. Raymond may become too expensive to keep and we have 3 or 4 clones of him waiting in the wings

I actually have not suggested any changes, I am just pointing out that we are a worse team next season unless we get a couple of solid D-men?

Bieksa 3.75 mil cap hit..Impossible to move

Salo 3.5 mil cap hit...impossible to move

Shane Obrien RFA...Can't let him walk for nothing so he is resigned

Sign two D-men for 7 mil?? If this happen's we are not a better team in fact we may still be worse than this year. To suggest that we have 3 or 4 clones waiting to replace Mason Raymond is a joke.....Raymond scored 25 goals last season which tied him for 15th best in the league for goals by a winger. We have to resign him.

The core of this team is in the prime of their career's, we have at best a 4 year window to win. We won't win with Luongo....Randle is correct. I really beleive the only way this core group of players has a chance to win is by getting rid of Lu.
5/13/2010 12:57 AM
Found out why randle is really not posting.. its not because he's crying... apparrently he got ratted out

-----Original Message-----
From: randle44
To: nickhead
Sent: 5/13/2010 1:54:00 AM
Subject: Lame

how lame is that? you know they suspended me till the 14 th? you ratted me out remember? i expect that from Winner but i guess your his alter ego?..it was about a comment to you..dont worry I couldve reciprocated about your comments but i dont turtle and run to the principal..no problem ill just regroup you in the same category as Gregos,Winner ..enjoy your Hawk fondu party..



Wish I could have taken credit, but randle's drunken tirades are so common I dont take them personal enough to become a lowdown rat
5/13/2010 11:37 AM
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
5/13/2010 1:34 PM
Well, I believe that the greatness of a team is defined by both team and individual success.

For example, the 76 Habs are a "great" team, maybe the greatest ever in the NHL, because they were superior to every other team, won the Cup AND they had half the players enter the Hall of Fame.

A second example of a team I think was "great" are the Atlanta Braves of the 90's. They only won one World Series, but they dominated their division for the better part of a decade and were anchored by 3 potential hall of fame pitchers in their rotation.

Conversely, I DO NOT believe that the 1993 Montreal Canadiens were a "great" team, even though they won the Stanley Cup.

I think you have to take it on a case-by-case basis instead of trying to make a blanket statement.
5/13/2010 1:47 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By deltagorfers on 5/12/2010
Quote: Originally Posted By nickhead on 5/12/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By deltagorfers on 5/12/2010

randle...for all your talk about Luongo throughout this last year I have got to say that I think you might be right. Started thinking that way down the stretch but was too optimistic to fully embrace those thoughts. No longer. Roberto had 2 or 3 great games these playoffs. The rest of them he was either average or downright bad. For us to take the next step and get to final or even round 3 for that matter we need some consistancy in the crease. I wish we could trade him but would there be any takers at 6 or 7 mil a season or whatever he is making? I'd be happy resigning Raycroft and going with him and Schneider in a tandom until the better of the two takes over. The money we would save would help us shore up our defence which (after goaltending) was a big liability.

Other players we could part with include Demitra, Bernier, Johnson, Hordichuk, Alberts and yes, Willie Mitchell

What about Bieksa?... two goals last night were solely his fault
I really do still think Bieksa has what it takes to be on a top defensive pairing. I won't disagree that he was the goat a couple of times in game 7. In other games in the playoffs he was a big part of the difference in why we won. The freak skate cut injuries he has picked up the last few years has really hurt his game. If he can avoid getting deep muscle cuts he will be able to develop his game to the point where the good more than makes up for the bad. I'm willing to give him a 'free' pass


I agree. I also think that Luongo's hangnails have been hurting his game.

5/13/2010 6:22 PM
◂ Prev 1...74|75|76|77|78...213 Next ▸
Canucks Thread - We Still Believe Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.