Quote: Originally Posted By jjboogie on 7/21/2009
not taking sides really in this debate but this doesn't really hold water. an equal argument can be made that the error between HBD SSs and RL SSs is not in the way the engine runs or the lineup choices made by coaches but rather that the players are not generated with the right defensive capabilities across the board compared to RL. that's not a "forced issue" as you suggest but one that is fixed at implementation.
Slow day at work, so I took at look at the recently completed season in MG.
32 shortstops qualified with enough defensive innings played to be listed among the league leaders in fielding.
14 of those shortstops had defensive ratings at or above the HBD recommendations of 80/85/85/85. Combined, they had a cumulative fielding percentage of .978.
The other 18 shortstops, who were under the recs in one or more rating, had a cumulative fielding percentage of .966.
Overall fielding percentage for the 32 shortstops was .971.
Draw your own conclusions. But it seems pretty clear that HBD shortstops with defensive ratings above the recs outperform the MLB average, and HBD shortstops with defensive ratings below the recs underperform the MLB average.