Master Draft Rosters & Commentary Topic

eleibowitz
Posts: 3680 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 289 10 4 15
Rookie
Posted by logain on 4/23/2011 3:19:00 PM (view original):
I would enjoy a follow up where all of the guys picked in rounds 1-5 were blacklisted... 
A master blaster blacklist league?  That would be interesting
4/23/2011 3:21 PM
dh555
Posts: 8997 (0)
Hall of Famer
499
Veteran
Posted by felonius on 4/23/2011 3:14:00 PM (view original):
Posted by dh555 on 4/23/2011 2:50:00 PM (view original):
i know last year the top of the draft had first crack at pf AND c....didnt help them all that much...with the salary cap and the depth of good owners i dont think its that big of an advantage
then you're crazy - like I said earlier I would build an open team at this cap with the players available to the #1 spot
from the pg and pf picks yea...but you would have better options from a open team at the sg and c spots than what they will have...and who knows what will be available at the sf spot and if some of the best sf options would even fit well
4/23/2011 3:27 PM
felonius
Posts: 3771 (0)
Hall of Famer
154 9 6
Rookie
dude he picked the best SG in the game (best guard period probably) and he's going to pick the one of the best bigs in the game (next) if he ever shows up (unless he's retarded) and then in a couple rounds he's going to pick a top SF (and I'll site mail you with my guess who that will be)

if I were building an open team at this cap I would have a utility PG like Kidd - I would have Lebron as my high usage player - I'd have a utility big and the guy he's about to pick - my SF is the only thing that might differ from what will be the case
4/23/2011 3:33 PM (edited)
longtallbrad
Posts: 4804 (0)
Hall of Famer
434 52
Pro
Please do.  I'm hard pressed to see a top SF lasting that far.
4/23/2011 3:34 PM
felonius
Posts: 3771 (0)
Hall of Famer
154 9 6
Rookie
done
4/23/2011 3:36 PM
dh555
Posts: 8997 (0)
Hall of Famer
499
Veteran
Posted by felonius on 4/23/2011 3:33:00 PM (view original):
dude he picked the best SG in the game (best guard period probably) and he's going to pick the one of the best bigs in the game (next) if he ever shows up (unless he's retarded) and then in a couple rounds he's going to pick a top SF (and I'll site mail you with my guess who that will be)

if I were building an open team at this cap I would have a utility PG like Kidd - I would have Lebron as my high usage player - I'd have a utility big and the guy he's about to pick - my SF is the only thing that might differ from what will be the case
there is no kidd still out there at sg though
4/23/2011 3:45 PM
felonius
Posts: 3771 (0)
Hall of Famer
154 9 6
Rookie
Posted by dh555 on 4/23/2011 3:45:00 PM (view original):
Posted by felonius on 4/23/2011 3:33:00 PM (view original):
dude he picked the best SG in the game (best guard period probably) and he's going to pick the one of the best bigs in the game (next) if he ever shows up (unless he's retarded) and then in a couple rounds he's going to pick a top SF (and I'll site mail you with my guess who that will be)

if I were building an open team at this cap I would have a utility PG like Kidd - I would have Lebron as my high usage player - I'd have a utility big and the guy he's about to pick - my SF is the only thing that might differ from what will be the case
there is no kidd still out there at sg though
there are still a handful of utility Gs who can do the job quite well though
4/23/2011 3:49 PM
scudmissle
Posts: 3587 (0)
Hall of Famer
483 4
Prospect
last season was: sf-pg-sg-c-pf.... not what was just said. ncih made it to the finals at the no. 12 spot... and shapandrew made it at the number 5 slot, and why shap did so well, was because wade had been forgotten and shap snagged him.
4/23/2011 4:00 PM (edited)
felonius
Posts: 3771 (0)
Hall of Famer
154 9 6
Rookie
what if rather than being 100% eligible it was position listed?
4/23/2011 4:04 PM
scudmissle
Posts: 3587 (0)
Hall of Famer
483 4
Prospect
but by doing that, monk, it just shifts the emphasis in another direction. doesn't change the effect much. lebron just goes first in the sf round, rather than the pg round, etc. the 100% rule gives us a little bit more flexibility shaping squads. or am i missing something?

oh, man, it's 4 am... going to bed. see ya tomorrow.
4/23/2011 4:09 PM (edited)
logain
Posts: 2582 (0)
Hall of Famer
4 110 428 2
Prospect
It would take depth from some rounds.. and make rd 5 better.
4/23/2011 4:09 PM
scudmissle
Posts: 3587 (0)
Hall of Famer
483 4
Prospect
well, it's worthy of consideration. i'm open to trying to make this league work the best way possible.
4/23/2011 4:10 PM
logain
Posts: 2582 (0)
Hall of Famer
4 110 428 2
Prospect
I personally like the 100 % effective method. By straight positions 3 #1 picks would be even better.
4/23/2011 4:11 PM
eleibowitz
Posts: 3680 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 289 10 4 15
Rookie
Why dont we drop the cap to 42M? Everyone would love that
4/23/2011 4:16 PM
dh555
Posts: 8997 (0)
Hall of Famer
499
Veteran
Posted by scudmissle on 4/23/2011 4:00:00 PM (view original):
last season was: sf-pg-sg-c-pf.... not what was just said. ncih made it to the finals at the no. 12 spot... and shapandrew made it at the number 5 slot, and why shap did so well, was because wade had been forgotten and shap snagged him.
we were both wrong.....it was sf-pf-pg-sg-c

also shap didnt have wade(calcutta did) and i was actually at the #12 spot.... i think i lost in the conference finals

was it shap who won it all?

4/23/2011 4:16 PM
◂ Prev 1...6|7|8|9|10...19 Next ▸
Master Draft Rosters & Commentary Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.